首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月27日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Argument Williamsona przeciwko KK-tezie
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Grzegorz Lisowski
  • 期刊名称:Diametros : an Online Journal of Philosophy
  • 电子版ISSN:1733-5566
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 期号:52
  • 页码:81-95
  • DOI:10.13153/diam.52.2017.1060
  • 语种:Polish
  • 出版社:Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University
  • 摘要:The KK-principle can be defined as follows: “For any subject x: if x knows that p, then she is always in a position to know that she knows that p”. This principle has been widely accepted in the history of philosophy. However, in contemporary epistemology it is considered controversial and regarded as an important part of the debate concerning the nature of knowledge. One of the arguments against the KK-principle has been presented by Timothy Williamson and it involves the so-called “safety principle”. In this paper, I argue against this account. My argument consists of two parts: in the first part, it is argued that the safety principle presented by Williamson contradicts Dretske’s account of knowledge. In the second part, I claim that the safety principle, as defined by Williamson, is not precise enough, which enables one to argue that it does not contradict the KK-principle.
  • 关键词:KK principle;theory of knowledge;luminosity;Timothy Williamson;theory of information
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有