期刊名称：Archai: revista de estudos sobre as origens do pensamento ocidental
印刷版ISSN：1984-249X
出版年度：2017
期号：20
页码：141-141
DOI：10.14195/1984-249X_20_6
语种：Portuguese
出版社：Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal / Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
摘要：Joseph Karbowski (Karbowski, 2015) recently proposed to reevaluate Allan's claim of considering the method of the Eudemian Ethics as ‘quasi mathematical’ (Allan, 1961). In this paper I argue that the dispute about the method in the Eudemian treatise would be more perspicuously done if, instead of searching for or denying mathematical features in the Eudemian Ethics, we strive to analyze the linguistic features of verbs using for introducing the premisses in the Eudemian treatise as well as in other texts as the Euclidean Elements. Besides, be it mathematical or not, the interpretations proposed by Allan and Karbowski are not capable of providing a full explanation of some important differences between books I and II of the Eudemian Ethics, differences for which I propose some tentative answers.
其他摘要：Joseph Karbowski (Karbowski, 2015) recently proposed to reevaluate Allan's claim of considering the method of the Eudemian Ethics as ‘quasi mathematical’ (Allan, 1961). In this paper I argue that the dispute about the method in the Eudemian treatise would be more perspicuously done if, instead of searching for or denying mathematical features in the Eudemian Ethics, we strive to analyze the linguistic features of verbs using for introducing the premisses in the Eudemian treatise as well as in other texts as the Euclidean Elements. Besides, be it mathematical or not, the interpretations proposed by Allan and Karbowski are not capable of providing a full explanation of some important differences between books I and II of the Eudemian Ethics, differences for which I propose some tentative answers.
