KOHTLA-VANAKULA WEAPONS AND TOOLS DEPOSIT: AN IRON AGE SACRIFICIAL SITE IN NORTH-EAST ESTONIA.
Oras, Ester ; Kriiska, Aivar ; Kimber, Andres 等
KOHTLA-VANAKULA WEAPONS AND TOOLS DEPOSIT: AN IRON AGE SACRIFICIAL SITE IN NORTH-EAST ESTONIA.
Introduction
In August 2013 a metal detectorist reported the discovery of around
a dozen heavily corroded iron artefacts in the field of Kohtla-Vanakula
village (Kohtla from here onwards), Ida-Virumaa county (north-east
Estonia). A month later the site was examined by archaeologists
supported by a volunteer group of metal detectorists and archaeologists.
During these initial studies it became evident that an extensive Iron
Age deposit including various weapons and tools had been discovered. The
following fieldwork seasons in late summer 2013 and 2014 (Oras &
Kriiska 2014; 2016) confirmed that Kohtla fields concealed a unique
find: the earliest and largest iron artefact deposit in Estonia and the
second largest of the kind in the whole eastern Baltic region.
The aim of this paper is to give a detailed overview of this
remarkable find and provide further information on its exact content and
context in order to introduce the Kohtla deposit to the wider
international audiences. Furthermore, several scientific analyses were
carried out as part of the studies of the Kohtla weapon deposit.
Therefore we also aim to exemplify the importance of the applications of
multidisciplinary analysis of such finds, because as we demonstrate,
combining different analytical approaches immensely helps to better
understand the chronology and initial context of the find. Finally we
will set the Kohtla deposit into the wider context of Iron Age
sacrificial sites and weapon deposits in Estonia and in the wider Baltic
Sea region, discussing both similarities and divergences of the
phenomenon of intentional concealments of iron artefacts in the 1st
millennium AD.
Fieldwork
The artefacts from the Kohtla deposit were discovered in a vast
area covering the total of almost 4.66 ha (Fig. 1). Ca 150 artefacts
were discovered during an extensive and systematic grid-based scanning
in the area of ca 2 ha with metal detectors. The artefacts were
scattered all over the field at the depth of some 30-40 cm, most likely
as a result of ploughing and other agricultural activities in later
historical periods (Fig. 1: B).
In the central part of the field the detector signals were
extremely intense, indicating a larger concentration of finds as opposed
to single scattered artefacts in other parts of the study area. Based on
the signal distribution a small excavation trench of approximately 2 x
3.5 m was created (T1 in Fig. 1). The first artefacts were unearthed
some 20 cm below the surface. Continuing with the soil removal a vast
concentration of iron artefacts, spread in the area of roughly 2 x 2 m
in deposited on top of each other, were revealed (Fig. 2). The artefacts
were collected in two excavation seasons of 2013 and 2014, whilst in
2014 further extensions to the initial trench were added in order to
obtain the artefacts from the profile sections as well. The central
excavated area (T1, Fig. 1) providing the majority of finds was
altogether ca 12 [m.sup.2]. All the items were documented and recorded
separately with unique identifying numbers. The fieldwork at Kohtla in
two seasons resulted in more than 800 catalogue numbers of weapons and
tools, including axes, spearheads, hoes, sickles, knives, and their
fragments, and some other artefacts (see below).
During the second fieldwork season, in 2014, an extensive
magnetometer study was carried out in order to detect other potential
iron artefact concentration areas. Based on magnetometric measurements,
additional trial trenches were created in various parts of the field
(see Fig. 1). However, it became clear that although some additional
iron artefacts were discovered in the trenches, there was no similar
vast conglomeration of iron objects in those areas. The anomalies
detected were most likely related to different geological and
anthropogenic sediment disturbances.
Find material
The total sum of catalogue numbers given to intact and fragmentary
objects from Kohtla is 818. However, this number is largely dependent on
the state of preservation of the finds. Fragile objects, like sickles,
have been fragmented to unidentifiable pieces, only a small amount of
which could be fitted together. Thus the number of initial artefacts is
much smaller. The exact number of artefacts concealed is difficult to
determine, but considering also that not the entire site has been
excavated, it ought to be at least some 400. The vast majority of
objects are spearheads, axes and sickles (Fig. 3). Although the iron
weapons and tools are in clear predominance in the find, there are also
a few unique items included in the deposit.
One of the very few ornaments discovered in the deposit was the
head part of a large bronze cross-bow brooch (Fig. 4: A). The brooch was
found as a scattered find in a metal detector test pit some tens of
metres from the main excavation trench. Its foot has been bent and
broken off before the concealment. Only six similar exemplars have been
found in Estonia so far (Tvauri 2012, 134). According to the artefact
typo-chronologies of similar finds in Finland and the Baits' region
it ought to belong somewhere around the 6th and 9th century AD and such
finds have been related to high-status male warriors (Kivikoski 1973,
64; Bliujiene 1999, 107 f). In addition to a brooch, a half of a small
round blue glass bead and two mounts (one of them a small pyramid-shaped
made of copper alloy, the other made of iron) were found.
There were also two strike-a-light stones found in the main
concentration area of the deposit. They represent two different types,
one being clearly worked into an oblong shape (Fig. 4: B), the other
resembling a natural unworked stone yet with clearly discernible hollows
for attaching a holding device in one end (Fig. 4: C). They both have
clear grooves in the middle part of the stone created during the
extensive use of fire making, i.e. striking an awl-like high-carbon iron
device across the groove to produce sparkles for lighting the fire.
These two items represent two separate types of strike-a-light stones in
the Baltic Sea region, with similar items having been discovered across
the Baltics and Scandinavia from the Roman Iron Age to the Migration
Period (e.g. Monikander 2015; Salo 1990; Pellinen 1999). It is
noteworthy that such strike-a-light stone finds have been almost
exclusively related to the male warrior paraphernalia (Monikander 2015,
58). However, in Estonia, over 70 strike-a-light stones have been
discovered, mostly as stray-finds, in rarer cases also in sand barrows
and stone graves (Jaanits et al. 1982, 291), and at some regions these
have been related to the distribution of slash-and-burn fields (Kriiska
2010).
In addition to the above, at least 12 knives, three hoe blades, one
rivet, seven iron rings (possibly parts of belt or horse gear
equipment), a small hammer (possibly of later historical date) and one
raw iron bar were found.
Some scarce bone finds were also found among the material from
Kohtla. Mostly these were small pieces of cremated bones scattered
between the artefacts. They were very difficult to identify in terms of
species, but they most likely represent animal bones (analysed by Anu
Kiviruut, see Appendix 5.2. in Oras & Kriiska 2016). Perhaps the
most remarkable finds among the bone material, however, were the remains
of an unburnt sheep skull (1), which were discovered in various places
in the excavation trench, and between the artefacts in situ. The latter
suggests that it is temporally closely related to the initial
archaeological deposit, not an accidental later addition. Unfortunately
the collagen preservation was extremely poor and we could not obtain a
direct AMS date of this find, which would allow to confirm its relation
to the rest of the deposit.
In addition to artefacts and bone material, some charred remains of
possibly wooden constructions were discovered. These were irregular
charred pieces of wood at the bottom of the excavation trench, some
sooty patches filled with charcoal, in one case forming a shallower
posthole in the extension of trench 1. The remains seemed to belong to
smaller logs and there was no direct indication of more substantial
constructions (major deep postholes, layers of wood, etc.). Thus, they
might originate from a temporary simple platform destroyed in a fire,
from some kind of illumination means used during the depositional
act(s), or from organic artefacts deposited in burnt condition. In order
to establish the chronology of these remains and their relation to the
artefact deposit, AMS dates were conducted of these remains (Table 1).
Spearheads
Among the assemblage from Kohtla, there were 122 fragmented
spearheads (Fig. 5), 18 blade tips or fragments with lenticular
cross-section as well as 38 sockets or socket fragments also belonging
to spearheads. All of the spearheads have tubular sockets, one was
fastened to the shaft with an iron nail (TU 2309: 74). The blades are
either narrow-lozenge or pointed-oval shaped (Fig. 5) with lenticular
cross-section. A few spearheads have 2-4 mm high midribs along the blade
with either convex or triangular cross-sections (e.g. TU 2309: 37, 87).
There are clear variations in the overall length of the spearheads, and
in the proportions of the blade to socket, but the fragmentation allowed
only a limited number of meaningful measurements to be taken. The blade
length of 22 spearheads could be measured, varying between 6-20 cm.
Socket length could be measured in 28 cases, and it remained between
5-12.5 cm. The outer diameter of the sockets was 1.5-2.5 cm. All in all,
the total length of 22 spearheads could be measured or approximately
assessed. The lengths vary between 14.5-31 cm, with the majority being
approximately 20-25 cm long.
Most of the damage to the spearheads is caused by post-depositional
processes, especially recent drainage and cultivation. Items scattered
farther afield from the concentration area were in particularly bad
shape, having been dragged around during ploughing. In only a few cases
pre-deposition damage of the spearheads could be detected--a broken-off
socket (TU 2309: 24) and some slightly bent blades (TU 2309: 45, 65,
74).
Socketed spearheads with narrow lozenge-shaped blades have usually
been dated to the Migration Period, many of those feature a raised
midrib with a convex or triangular cross-section (Tvauri 2012, 190).
Spearheads with a simple pointed-oval-shaped blade and rather varied
blade-to-socket ratios have been used from the Migration Period until
the Viking Age (Tvauri 2012, 190 ff). However, there are some examples
from much earlier contexts as well. One of these is the Late Pre-Roman
Iron Age hoard of Pernaja in Malmsby, in south-west Finland, which is of
a similar composition to Kohtla--iron sickles, a socketed axe,
spearheads, and additionally scythes and tenon axes (Salo 1968, 83;
1984, 191). A few items have been found from burial sites in Estonia as
well, e.g. grave II at Poanse (Mandel 2000, fig. 18). This context has
been dated to the end of the Pre-Roman Iron Age (Lang 2007, 176),
whereas the spearhead type has been dated from the (Late) Pre-Roman Iron
Age until the Early Roman Iron Age (Lang 2007, 187 and literature
cited). Spearheads of a similar shape have been found from a few other
tarand graves as well (e.g. grave I at Viimsi), but the parts of graves
that contain weapons have usually been dated to the end of the Roman
Iron Age and the Migration Period (Lang 2007, 216). As the direct dates
of wood remains from some of the spearheads show (see below), rather
earlier dates from Pre-Roman and Roman Iron Age are characteristic of
the Kohtla spearheads.
Several spearheads contained wood remains in their sockets
attesting that their initial deposition was carried out with handles (or
parts of them) still attached. The remains were microscopically analysed
in order to identify the wood species used as handle material. The
results invariably indicated deciduous trees (12 out of 14 samples
analysed, whilst two remained unidentified) and it was possible to
further identify their origin in four cases: in three examples birch
(Betula), and one case probably acer (Acer platanoides) (2) were used.
Some of these were AMS dated in order to establish a more precise
chronology of spearheads discovered in Kohtla (Table 1; Tvauri et al.
2018).
Axes
Axes are represented by 100 specimens (Fig. 6), to which nine
socket fragments can be added. The overwhelming majority of the axes are
socketed, commonly with a slightly flaring blade section, but some
examples with the blade section narrower than the socket. They lack a
small loop for the handle which is characteristic of socketed axes from
the Pre-Roman Iron Age until the (Early) Roman Iron Age (Lang 2007,
140). They would thus appear to represent a later, more massive form of
socketed axes which were used during the Late Roman Iron Age and the
Migration Period, at least until the 7th century AD (Lang 2007, 140;
Tvauri 2012, 124). Similar items have thus far been found in Migration
Period and 7th century graves, at forts, settlement sites and as stray
finds (Tvauri 2012, 124), and from wealth deposits that have accumulated
over long periods of time (Oras 2015). However, again the direct AMS
dates from the wood remains of the sockets show that we are dealing with
earlier examples belonging to the Pre-Roman and Roman Iron Age (Table 1;
Saage et al. 2018).
The state of preservation of axes was much better compared to
spearheads. The length of socketed axes was 10-28 cm, mostly around
15-20 cm. The diameter of the sockets was 2.5-5 cm, commonly between
3.5-4 cm. Blade width was quite standard, 4-5 cm. Before cleaning and
treatment in alkaline solution, the socketed axes weighed around 400-800
g (the treatment reduced the weight by 20-120 g, depending mainly on the
success in removing the hardened soil from the sockets). The only
detectable pre-depositional modifications on socketed axes include a
bent and partially broken-off socket (TU 2309: 215) and some notched
blades (TU 2309: 238, 246). One axe socket had a broken-off spearhead
socket corroded to the inside of it (TU 2309: 229).
Additionally, there are seven examples of shafted axes with narrow
blades. Two rather massive specimens have broad polls (TU 2309: 255,
269). They are 24 and 19 cm long, weighing around 800-900 g. This type
of axe has been tentatively dated to the Pre-Viking Age (Tvauri 2012,
124). Four examples have narrow polls, being somewhat smaller and
lighter, i.e. 15-18 cm in length, weighing 400-600 g (e.g. TU 2309: 230,
294). Based on Latvian analogues, this type has been dated to the
6th-10th centuries (Tvauri 2012, 125). One slightly flaring axe blade
probably also belonged to a narrow-bladed shafted axe (TU 2309: 260).
Shafted axes have been produced in eastern and northern Europe covering
the vast region from southern Finland to the steppe areas of the Black
Sea since the Pre-Roman Iron Age onwards (Tsiglis 2000, 112). The early
versions of such axes are scarce finds; in Estonia and Latvia only some
tens are known so far, with usually unclear find context (Jaanits et al.
1982, 191, 232; Tsiglis 2000, 112). However, it has to be noted that we
have no direct dates of wood remains from shafted axes, and although the
majority of socketed axes are from around the Early Roman Iron Age, the
shafted versions could be also of later date. In addition to axes, one
has to mention three hoe blades, which so far have been rare in Estonian
archaeological collections.
As with spearheads, several axe sockets contained wooden handle
remains. A total of 13 specimens were analysed. Similarly to spears, the
material used was mostly from deciduous trees, although in two examples
also coniferous trees had been used. Four axes had handles made of birch
(Betula), and four of acer (Acer platanoides) (3). The dates obtained
from several of the wooden remains from axes help to elaborate on the
chronology of this type of socketed axes in the eastern Baltic (Table
1).
Sickles
All the sickles (Fig. 7) from Kohtla were fragmented, some broken
into more than ten or even twenty pieces. The high rate of fragmentation
is mostly due to smaller amount of iron preserved in these thin
artefacts compared to e.g. axes and spearheads.
Due to the extremely fragmentary nature of the sickles, determining
the number of the originally deposited specimens was a major challenge.
Two different methods were used (see Juus 2015 for details). First,
following the concept of MNI (minimum number of individuals) from
osteoarchaeology, the MNA (minimum number of artefacts) was employed.
All of the ends of sickle hafts (they mostly end with a little hook or
sometimes without one), and the tips were counted. Since the handle was
usually better preserved than the tip, the first was considered as a
more reliable indicator. According to this method at least 128 sickles
were represented. Additionally, the fragments presumably belonging to
haft ends and tips were also counted. These included, the number
increases to 176 sickles. The second method was based on dividing the
whole weight of the sickle fragments with the average weight of one
sickle. At first, standard deviation of the weight of 14 complete
sickles was calculated. One of them turned out to be an outlier
(considerably heavier than others) so the weight of 13 sickles was used.
The average weight of a sickle based on those 13 exemplars was 107.3 g.
The total weight of sickle finds was divided by an average weight of one
sickle (24 548.5 g / 107.3 g), which gave the result of 228 (rounded
down to the nearest whole number). Thus, based on weight calculations
there might have been even 228 sickles in the deposit.
Due to the very fragmented material the specific sickle types could
only be determined for 20 specimens. Most of them were quite wide and
curved, but some narrower examples (possibly heavily sharpened, see Fig.
7) were represented as well. The width of more intact blades varies from
2.5 to 6.7 cm, but most of them were at least 4.5 cm wide. The length
was 18-31 cm, mostly around 22-27 cm. The length by the arch was at
least 23 cm but mostly at least 30 cm. The longest one was 45 cm.
According to the Estonian sickle typology (Laul & Tonisson 1991),
they belonged to type IIIb and its subtypes, which are common among
similar iron artefact depositional sites from north-eastern Estonia.
Remarkably, however, the Kohtla deposit has doubled the number of
sickles known from Estonian Iron Age.
Dates
In total, 20 AMS dates were obtained from various samples from the
Kohtla weapon deposit: five from wooden constructions, seven from wooden
remains from the sockets of spearheads and axes, and eight from charcoal
pieces directly relating to the sickle finds. The results are presented
in Table 1 and Fig. 8.
The results of AMS dating from wood remains from the sockets of
spears and axes are particularly noteworthy: they are one of the few
direct dates in the eastern Baltic Iron Age depositional material
allowing to establish a more detailed chronology of the specific
artefact types. As is evident, the dates from axes and spearheads are
mostly from around the Roman Iron Age (ca 50-450), some could be even
slightly earlier, belonging to the Pre-Roman Iron Age. This is somewhat
earlier than previously reported for these particular types of finds,
i.e. most often around the Migration Period (Tvauri 2012; see also
Tvauri et al. 2018). Our results indicate that the spearheads and axes
of the kind might go back several centuries earlier in the eastern
Baltic material. This is in fact also supported by some similar finds
from earlier i.e. Pre-Roman Iron Age and Early Roman Iron Age finds from
other sites around the Baltic Sea, e.g. the Finnish Pernaja Malmsby find
mentioned above.
Dates of charcoal pieces directly relating to sickle finds (either
directly beneath or even between the sickle blades) are either
contemporaneous with most of the axes and spearheads, although four
examples could be slightly later in date. One explanation is that these
sickles are potentially later additions to the deposit, or that somewhat
later fragments of charcoal might have still ended up in close
stratigraphical context with the sickle blades. However, statistically
it is still possible that they do overlap with the rest of the
weapons' dates, and thus no clear chronological distinction can be
made.
The radiocarbon dates from the charcoal remains from potential
wooden constructions beneath the artefact deposit layer and from the
shallow post-hole in trench 1 extension allow to make two major
conclusions. First, the wooden remains under the thick layer of
artefacts in the main excavation trench are roughly from the same time
period as the artefacts concealed on top of it and if these are related
to some kind of wooden construction, this was built at the time or
directly prior to the major depositional event. The results from
charcoal remains in trench 1 extension, however, are of later date, i.e.
from around the Migration Period.
These results indicate that there were at least two separate phases
of use at the depositional site--one from around the first centuries
around the turn of common era, the other from around mid-1st millennium
AD. Both earlier, i.e. (Pre-)Roman Iron Age, and later uses of the site
are supported by artefact finds as well. Namely, the dated wood from the
sockets of axes and spearheads belongs to around the turn of common era
and it is most likely that majority of the weapon and sickle finds
belong to this particular timeframe, showing that the most extensive use
of the site took place at this time period. The later period date from
trench 1 extension is supported by the brooch find, potentially also
some axes of later origin. However, this later use-phase was possibly
far less extensive as indicated by fewer later artefact finds and number
of direct AMS dates belonging to this period.
Environment
The contemporary landscape at Kohtla does not give any indication
of the possibility that the deposit might belong to any water-related
context. However, looking at the relief-specific Lidar data (Fig. 1: A)
historic maps, and the toponym of the farmstead in which the site is
located, quite a different story is revealed. Namely, it is clear that
there was a larger spring and a small rivulet had been running in the
area still in the 19th century as seen on historical maps (Fig. 9). The
name of the farmstead--Luharahva (Eng. Water-meadow farm), as well as
stories told by local elderly community members describe that the area
was marshy and wet meadow, which was difficult to cross during the
spring and autumn seasons and that it was turned into a dry field as the
result of mining activities around the mid-20th century. These hints
allowing to relate the site with watery depositional context were also
validated and supported by further environmental analysis (see Kriiska
et al. 2018). As part of these analyses the location of the now
dried-out rivulet was determined in the landscape. Additionally samples
of soil blocks were collected for micromorphological analysis showing
several features characteristic to wetland site (see Kriiska et al. 2018
for details).
Discussion
The Kohtla weapon deposit with its total number of at least 400
initial artefacts is the largest Iron Age intentional artefact
concealment in Estonia. It contained a vast number of different iron
artefact types, many of which are not the most common in Estonian
archaeological collections. For instance, as a result of the Kohtla
deposit the number of sickles and hoe blades increased by an order of
magnitude, also the number of socketed axes went up by tens thanks to
the Kohtla find. Therefore, the deposit makes an important contribution
to our overall understanding of Iron Age material and has a significant
input for further developments of local artefact typo-chronologies.
The additional uniqueness of the Kohtla deposit relates to the fact
that, unlike in Scandinavia, so far thorough scientific excavations at
similar artefact deposit sites have been rare. Most of such
"hoards" have been discovered by non-specialists who often
have removed the items from their initial context. Although some
disturbance due to later tillage work is expected in the case of the
Kohtla find as well, we can still be certain that the artefact layers in
the main excavation trench were left in situ. This opened up several
additional possibilities for studying and interpreting the site,
including e.g. the relationship between different artefact types,
various sampling methods allowing direct relation to specific artefacts,
immediate environmental reconstructions, etc. These altogether allow to
make better argued interpretations of the find and its formation
processes--the questions which often have remained unanswered due to
lack of pristine contextual information.
Relating to artefact typo-chronology perhaps the most important
achievement is the direct scientific dating (AMS) of specific artefact
types. The dates obtained from wood remains preserved in the sockets of
axes and spearheads widen our knowledge on the use and distribution of
these artefact types considerably. As discussed, the results from the
Kohtla deposit show that socketed axes and spearheads, the types of
which have been previously mostly thought to belong to the Migration
Period or following centuries, are in fact earlier. Majority of them
belong to the middle of the Roman Iron Age, but for some, the date of
use might extend even up to the turn of common era (see also Tvauri et
al. 2018; Saage et al. 2018).
Although unique in terms of abundance of artefacts, the Kohtla
deposit has several counterparts, both locally and abroad. There are
around half a dozen similar weapons-tools deposits known in Estonian
prehistoric material. These include amongst others Alulinn, Kunda,
Rikassaare, Igavere, and a North-Estonian find of unknown exact origin
(see Oras, 2015, chapter 6; 2010 and literature cited). They all contain
predominantly iron artefacts--mostly weapons, but also some tools. Vast
majority of items belong to the 6th-7th centuries typo-chronologically,
although there are also a couple of later finds (Kaabe, Koorkula
Valgjarv) of similar nature in which objects from around 8th-9th
centuries were found. The number of objects and types of artefacts vary
to some extent (see Table 2). The common denominator is clearly
spearheads, but also axes and battle knives or even fragments of swords
are presented in those finds. It is particularly noteworthy that all
these 'hoards' relate exclusively with watery depositional
context: they have been discovered from either bog (marshy overflooded
area) or in direct relation to open water sources. There is almost no
mixing of different object types, i.e. no co-occurrence of iron and
precious metal or bronze objects in these deposits, and it is clear that
iron objects have been distinctively selected for these deposits.
Therefore one can conclude that there was a specific depositional
tradition followed in the 1st millennium AD Estonian material where
preferential deposition of iron objects, mostly weapons, but also tools,
in watery contexts was conducted, whilst precious metal or bronze
ornament concealments were handled in different contexts and
geographical areas (see Oras 2015 for details).
Taking a closer look at the deposits of iron artefacts, it becomes
evident that there is even more specific depositional phenomenon
spreading in the northeastern coastal region of Estonia, Virumaa county,
which extremely closely correlates with the Kohtla deposit. Namely, both
in Alulinn and Kunda a marshy/bog area has been used for depositing iron
items over several centuries: the earliest objects belong to the first
centuries AD, the majority of items to around 6th-7th century, and in
the case of Alulinn objects from the 12th-13th century are presented as
well. Furthermore, if in other Estonian iron deposits sickles and
scythes are rare, then they are found in abundance in the case of
Alulinn and also from the North-Estonian deposit, whilst in Kunda the
extraordinary addition of tools includes coal trowels. All these finds
are located in a close cluster of only some 30-40 km from each other and
they clearly represent a similar depositional tradition, which has
several common denominators: the long-term use of the same site, iron
objects including either weapons and/or tools, water-related
depositional context.
The specific depositional practice combining weapons and tools in
watery contexts is a wide-spread phenomenon in the circum-Baltic region.
Several similar deposits are known from the other Baltic countries and
Poland as well (see e.g. Bliujiene 2010; Nowakiewicz &
Rzeszotarska-Nowakiewicz 2012; Oras 2015). The most famous are perhaps
the two Kokmuiza finds from Latvia where hundreds of weapons (total of
ca 1280 and 130 objects for the first and second deposit respectively),
but also tools, bracelets, belt parts, etc., all characteristic of
warrior paraphernalia, were found (Riekstins 1931; Urtans 1977) (4). The
date of artefacts in the Kokmuiza deposits is mid-5th--early 6th
centuries coinciding rather well with the Estonian examples discussed
above. However, so far these dates have been based on artefact
chronologies rather than on direct radiocarbon dating. Looking at the
artefactual content of Kokmuiza finds, the spearheads and axes, but also
strike-a-light stones look very similar to the ones discovered in Kohtla
for which the direct date is a couple of centuries earlier. However,
this does not necessarily contradict the dates proposed for the Latvian
finds, since it needs to be kept in mind that the use of similar weapon
types may prolonged over several centuries (see also Tvauri et al.
2018).
In the context of dating and in comparison with other eastern
Baltic finds the Kohtla deposit stands out for its earlier origin, i.e.
the majority of items seem to have been deposited somewhere around the
first centuries AD, with also some earlier and later additions. These
dates, however, overlap well with the similar depositional practices in
the western Baltic, namely the famous Scandinavian booty sacrifices such
as Illerup, Nydam (Rau 2010), Vimose, Ejsbol, Thorsberg, Porskjser in
Denmark and northern Germany (Illkaer 2003; Pauli Jensen 2009; Rau
2010). These too contain mainly weapons, but also some tools and
personal attires found in water related contexts. Artefacts therein
belong mostly to the Roman Iron Age (with also some earlier and later
additions). The Kohtla find is the first among others in the eastern
Baltic to coincide with the Scandinavian finds in terms of dates. It
forms an interesting link between the eastern and western Baltic
depositional traditions showing that this phenomenon of depositing iron
objects, often with strong military connotation, might have had earlier
and rather wider-spread echoes also in the eastern Baltic region. This,
in turn, allows to propose the hypothesis that differently from the
later finds in the eastern Baltic, the Kohtla deposit reflects more
larger-scale Roman Iron Age historical events and processes, i.e.
conflicts and contacts of violent nature, resulting in rather similar
material expressions at the two sides of the Baltic Sea.
However, there are also several aspects for which Kohtla deposit is
unique amongst its Scandinavian and eastern Baltic counterparts. First,
differently from others, there are very few examples of personal
attires, especially ornaments from Kohtla. The only possibly earlier
decorative item, which might belong to the same period as the majority
of weapons and sickles, is a fragment of a glass bead. The other
ornament from Kohtla is the previously mentioned head of the cross-bow
brooch, which, although being also associated with the elite warrior
status (see e.g. Vilcane 2003, 132), is clearly a later addition to the
find dating several centuries later than the majority of weapons and
tools. Second, it is evident that tools have been deposited in abundance
in Kohtla, because the fragments of sickles form a large part of the
whole deposit. This is somewhat unexpected especially when comparing the
contents of similar finds from Latvia and Scandinavia which tend to have
a very close relationship to war activities and warrior personal
belongings ranging from weaponry to symbolic and male-related ornaments
(warrior bracelets, belt parts, etc.). Also, unlike the Scandinavian
parallels, there has been barely if any considerable pre-depositional
manipulation like hatching and bending of weapons in Kohtla. Few axes
and one spearhead show some signs of potentially pre-depositional
deformation, there is also an example of a socket of an axe into which a
spearhead must have been stuck after which its blade has been broken
off, and finally the previously mentioned head of the brooch must have
been bent off from its tail part. But these examples are rare and most
of the objects seem to have been deposited in intact condition.
This allows to propose an interpretation of the Kohtla find as an
example of rather small-scale, perhaps even so-called Virumaa specific,
regional depositional practice, which, on the one hand, combines the
lines of some wider-spread circum-Baltic, but on the other, also
describes very local traditions of artefact concealment. The following
of the wide-spread depositional phenomenon is expressed by the inclusion
of weapons (spears and axes) in the deposit, which indicate warrior
related and violent nature for at least part of the concealment. The
fact that many sockets of weapons still included wooden fragments hints
at the possibility that they were deposited with the handles, e.g.
thrust into ground, although it is also possible that the handles were
broken/cut off prior the deposition. Here, we might talk about potential
booty sacrifices in the similar meaning as Scandinavian Roman Iron Age
finds have been discussed (Randsborg 1995; Ilkjaer 2000). The latter is
also supported by further specific analysis of artefactual material.
Namely, the study of a typical Kohtla axe presented by Saage et al. 2018
concludes that the finds of similar technique and date have been
discovered in other parts of the eastern Baltic, but not in Estonia.
Also, the finds of strike-a-light stones are generally scarce in
Estonia, but very similar examples have been discovered in e.g. Kokmuiza
finds in Latvia (Riekstins 1931), Illerup in Denmark (Ilkjaer 2000) but
also in Finnish Iron Age material (Salo 1990; Pellinen 1999).
Additionally, the fragment of the cross-bow brooch is most likely not a
local production and similar finds have been related to coastal eastern
Baltic regions. Thus, the artefactual material seems to indicate at
least some foreign origin allowing to hypothesize that we are looking at
possible sacrifice of war-related items collected from the enemies'
troops either locally or abroad, and most likely in several occasions.
The latter interpretation fits rather well with the overall character of
finds of similar nature in Scandinavia as well.
However, the multiple depositional acts forming one single large
concealment is something of its own local character. In the case of
Kohtla but also in other Virumaa finds we see dating ranges over half a
millennium up to the 6th-7th centuries (or even 12th-13th centuries). An
extra twist to this local long-term practice feature is given by the
considerable number of tools found at Kohtla: there are both sickles and
hoes having clear agricultural rather than warrior connotations. These
make one think more towards e.g. fertility related rituals associated
with harvesting and land cultivation. Also, the strike-a-light stones
could be related to land cultivation, namely slash-and-burn fields, and
related fertility rites (e.g. Kriiska 2010, 24).
Perhaps this long-term use of one and the same site is the key to
solve this problem, which at first sight might look like an issue of
controversy. Namely, as the long-term and repeated use of the same site
evidences, it was clearly an important landscape and cultural locale for
the local community which was remembered, re-used and passed along over
many generations. In this context it can hardly be expected that the
exact reasons triggering the deposition of artefacts had been the same
over centuries. Therefore the inclusion of artefacts of rather different
nature could be even expected. Perhaps it is worth suggesting that
different artefact functional groups represent different actualities in
given societies over time. In times of wars and violent attacks warrior
related equipment (either local or confiscated) was considered as
suitable means for calming down the situation and addressing the
supernatural. In times of famine or bad harvest (or why not good
harvest?), more suitable items like sickles and hoes were selected
instead. Relating to these, and potentially also some other depositional
reasons, which will never become fully available for us today, there
might have been more and less intensive use periods of the site. The
latter is also supported by the direct radiocarbon dates and typology
based dating of the complete artefact set from Kohtla. Therefore it
would be wrong to try to give only one and single explanation to this
unique site, and perhaps the sacrificial site in the widest sense
without any direct or single relation to specific booty sacrifices or
fertility cults is in place. As such, the inclusion of weapons and tools
is not necessarily contradictory. Instead, there are rather two more
important focal aspects for the Kohtla deposit. First, the exact
location--the depositional site binding together different reasons as
expressed by different artefact functional groups over several
centuries. And second, the material itself--iron as the common
denominator indicating that there were rather strict ideas as to what is
suitable for depositing at this particular site.
Conclusions
The Kohtla deposit belongs to the earliest and is so far the
largest Iron Age (sacrificial) deposit in Estonia and the second largest
in the eastern Baltic region. It is an example of a depositional site
with long-term usage ranging from the turn of common era up to the
Pre-Viking Age, in which, however, very distinctive and acknowledged
selections of artefacts--mostly iron objects of weapons and tools--can
be seen. Owing to the opportunity to excavate the Kohtla site and
finding the artefacts in situ we were able to maximize the information
about the environment, artefacts, their spatio-temporal details and ways
of concealment. The increase in several artefact types and direct AMS
dates of items discovered in Kohtla help to refine the Iron Age artefact
typochronology in the eastern Baltic. On a wider interpretative scale
the Kohtla deposit forms an intriguing link between the Scandinavian and
the eastern Baltic Iron Age weapons-tools deposits. It is somewhat
earlier than the majority of its eastern Baltic parallels coinciding
with the specific depositional tradition in Scandinavia. With its
weaponry finds it might even reflect similar warrior-related
connotations proposed for the western Baltic finds from the same period,
carrying the seal of the spirit of the times in Roman Iron Age
circum-Baltic context. Yet, it also contains several strands of more
local depositional traditions like the inclusion of artefacts of
agricultural nature or the very long-term use of the site covering
several centuries. Thus, the Kohtla find is a unique and important
example of combinations of both local and wide-spread Iron Age
depositional practices at the two sides of the Baltic Sea.
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to all the volunteers who participated in
the fieldwork at Kohtla. Our sincere gratitude goes to Tonno Jonuks,
Kristiina Johanson, Martti Veldi and Liivi Varul who dedicated their
valuable time to the excavations in somewhat extreme circumstances, and
to the members of the metal detecting club Kamerad for their
collaboration. Our distinct gratitude is dedicated to our very special
team member Jaana Ratas--without her remarkable drawing and
photographing skills the documentation of the Kohtla excavations would
have been simply impossible, not to mention her ways of keeping the
spirits high despite the severe working conditions. Kristel Kajak and
Andres Vindi render thanks for their consultancy with the
post-excavation work, Eve Rannamae and Anu Kiviruut for their work with
bone material, Regino Kask for his help with identifying the wood
remains from Kohtla, and Juri Plado for his magnetometric studies.
Many institutes and organizations supported the Kohtla project
financially: Estonian National Heritage Board, Arheograator Ltd.,
University of Tartu Faculty of Arts and Humanities base funding for the
research of national significance, Estonian Ministry of Education and
Research institutional research project IUT20-7, and the European Union
through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence in
Cultural Theory, CECT). The publication costs of this article were
covered by the Estonian Academy of Sciences, the Institute of History
and Archaeology at the University of Tartu, and the Institute of
History, Archaeology and Art History of Tallinn University.
References
Bliujiene, A. 1999. Vikingu epochos kursiu papuosalu ornamentika.
Diemedzio, Vilnius.
Bliujiene, A. 2010. The bog offerings of the Baits: 'I give in
order to get back'.--Archaeologia Baltica, 14, 136-165.
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon
dates.--Radiocarbon, 51, 337-360.
Ilkjaer, J. 2000. Illerup Adal: Archaeology as a Magic Mirror.
Moesgard Museum, Hojbjerg.
Ilkjaer, J. 2003. Danish war booty sacrifices.--The Spoils of
Victory: The North in the Shadow of the Roman Empire. Eds L. Jorgensen,
B. Storgaard & L. G. Thomsen. Nationalmuseet, Copenhagen, 44-65.
Jaanits, L., Laul, S., Lougas, V. & Tonisson, E. 1982. Eesti
esiajalugu. Eesti Raamat, Tallinn.
Juus, T. 2015. Sirbid Kohtla Vanakiila peitleius. Bakalaureusetoo.
Tartu. Manuscript in the archives of TU AK.
Kivikoski, E. 1973. Die Eisenzeit Finnlands: Bildwerk Und Text.
Neuausgabe. Weilin+Goos, Helsinki.
Kriiska, A 2010. Muinasaeg.--Loodus, aeg, inimene. Eds A. Vunk et
al. (Parnumaa, 2.) Eesti Entsuklo-peediakirjastus, Tallinn, 13-32.
Kriiska, A., Oras, E., Heinsalu, A., Post, T., Shanskiy, M. &
Plado, J. 2018. Environmental studies at the Kohtla-Vanakula Iron Age
sacrificial site.--EJA, 22: 1, 66-79.
Lang, V. 2007. The Bronze and Early Iron Ages in Estonia. (Estonian
Archaeology, 3.) Tartu University Press.
Laul, S. & Tonisson, E. 1991. Muistsete sirpide ja vikatite
kujunemisloost Eestis.--Arheoloogiline kogumik. Eds L. Jaanits & V.
Lang. (MT, 1.) Tallinn, 75-91.
Mandel, M. 2000. Poanse tarandkalmed.--Toid ajaloo alalt, II. Ed.
T. Tamla. Eesti Ajaloomuuseum, Tallinn, 89-111.
Monikander, A. 2015. Negotiating fire and water: strike-a-lights
from the Early Iron Age in Scandinavian wetlands.--Journal of Wetland
Archaeology, 15: 1, 57-71.
Nowakiewicz, T. & Rzeszotarska-Nowakiewicz, A. 2012. Jezioro
Nidajno kolo Czaszkowa na Mazurach: niezwykle miejsce kultu z okresu
poznej starozytnosci. Lake Nidajno near Czaszkowo in Masuria: A Unique
Sacrificial Site from Late Antiquity. Komitet Nauk Pra- i
Protohistorycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Instytut Archeologii
Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej
Akademii Nauk, Warszawa.
Oras, E. 2010. Ritual wealth deposits in Estonian Mddle Iron Age
material.--EJA, 14: 2, 123-142.
Oras, E. 2015. Practices of Wealth Depositing in the 1st-9th
Century AD Eastern Baltic. Sidestone Press, Leiden.
Oras, E. & Kriiska, A. 2014. The Kohtla weapon deposit:
Preliminary results.--AVE, 2013, 55-66.
Oras, E. & Kriiska, A. 2016. Arheoloogilised valitood Kohtla
ohverduskohal 2013.-2014. aastal. Tartu. Manuscript in the archives of
TU AK.
Pauli Jensen, X. 2009. From fertility rituals to weapon sacrifices.
The case of the south Scandinavian bog finds.--Glaube, Kult und
Herrschaft: Phanomene des Religiosen im 1. Jahrtausend n. Chr. in
Mittel- und Nordeuropa. Akten des 59. Internationalen Sachsensymposions
und der Grundprobleme der fruhgeschichtlichen Entwicklung im
Mitteldonauraum. Eds U. v. Freeden et al. (Kolloquien zur Vor- und
Fruhgeschichte, 12.) Bonn, 53-64.
Pellinen, H-M. 1999. Soikeiden tuluskivien
konteksti.--Muinaistutkija, 1, 24-38.
Randsborg, K. 1995. Hjortspring: Warfare and Sacrifice in Early
Europe. Aarhus University Press.
Rau, A. 2010. Nydam Mose: Die personengebundenen Gegenstande,
Grabungen 1989-1999. Aarhus University Press.
Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck J. W., Blackwell, P. G.,
Bronk Ramsey, C., Grootes, P. M., Guilderson, T. P., Haflidason, H.,
Hajdas, L., Hatte, C., Heaton, T. J., Hoffmann, D. L., Hogg, A G.,
Hughen, K. A., Kaiser, K. F., Kromer, B., Manning, S. W., Niu, M.,
Reimer, R W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M., Southon, J. R., Staff, R
A., Turney, C. S. M. & van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and
Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0-50,000 years cal
BP.--Radiocarbon, 55: 4, 1111-1150.
Riekstins, H. 1931. Der zweite depotfund von Kokumuiza.--Congressus
secundus archaeologorum Balticorum, Rigae, 19.-23. VIII. 1930. (Acta
Universitatis Latviensis. Philologorum et Philosophorum ordinis series.)
Rigae, 473-478.
Saage, R., Kiilmann, K. & Tvauri, A. 2018. Manufacture
technology of socketed iron axes.--EJA, 22: 1, 51-65.
Salo, U. 1968. Die fruhromische Zeit in Finnland. (SMYA, 67.)
Helsinki.
Salo, U. 1984. Pronssikausi ja rautakauden alku. (Suomen historia,
1.) Espoo, 99-249.
Salo, U. 1990. Fire-striking implements of iron and Finnish myths
relating to the birth of fire.--Iskos, 9,49-61.
Tsiglis, Ya. 2000. = [phrase omitted].--Archaeologia Lituana, 4,
112-121.
Tvauri, A. 2012. The Migration Period, Pre-Viking Age, and Viking
Age in Estonia. (Estonian Archaeology, 4.) Tartu University Press.
Tvauri, A., Oras, E. & Saage, R. 2018. Spearheads from
Kohtla-Vanakula find: refining Early Iron Age spearhead typo-chronology
in the Eastern Baltic.--EJA, 22: 1, 32-50.
Urtans, V. 1977. Senakie depoziti Latvija lidz 1200. g. Zinatne,
Riga.
Vilcane, A. 2003. Ancient Latgallian women's ornaments.--Art,
Applied Art and Symbols in Latvian Archaeology. Ed. I. Loze. (Humanities
and Social Sciences, Latvia, 2(39).) University of Latvia, Riga,
118-140.
Ester Oras, Aivar Kriiska, Andres Kimber, Kristiina Paavel ja Taisi
Juus
KOHTLA-VANAKULA RELVADE JA TOORIISTADE PEITVARA: RAUAAEGNE
OHVERDUSKOHT KIRDE-EESTIS
Resumee
2013. aasta augustis andis otsinguvahendi kasutaja teada, et
Ida-Virumaalt Kohtla-Vanakula pollult leiti monikummend korrodeerunud
raudeset. Jargnenud arheoloogiliste uuringute kaigus 2013. ja 2014.
aastal tuvastati senini Eesti vanim ja suurim ning Baltimaade suuruselt
teine raudesemetest koosnev peitvara.
Leiud paiknesid osalt laialikuntuna, osalt kontsentreeritumalt
kokku ule 4,5 ha suurusel alal (jn 1). Suurem osa laialikuntud
arheoloogilistest esemetest tuvastati 2013. aastal sustemaatilisel
metallidetektoritega teostatud otsingul, kuid koige arvukamalt paiknesid
leiud uhel kontsentratsioonialal, kuhu rajati 2 x 3,5 m kaevand (jn 2).
Viimast laiendati 2014. aastal, et koguda eelmisel kaevamishooajal maha
jaanud esemed. Lisaks rajati 2014. aastal mitu proovitranseed,
kontrollimaks magnetomeetriauuringutega tuvastatud anomaaliate iseloomu.
Kokku kogunes Kohtla valitoode jooksul 818 alanumbrit leide. Ometi
ei kajasta see leidude koguarvu, sest mitmed esemed (eriti sirbid) olid
aarmiselt fragmenteerunud ja nende algset arvu on keeruline tuvastada.
Siiski voime Kohtla leiu uldarvuna konelda vahemalt 400 tervikesemest
(jn 3). Nende hulgas on erandlikena naiteks uks ambsole pea ja kaks
tuluskivi (jn 4), vaike klaashelme katke, kummekond nuga, kolm koblast,
moned naastud-needid, rauast rongad ning toorrauatukk. Arvukalt--kokku
vahemalt 122 leiuga--on esindatud odaotsad (jn 5). Kirveid leiti kokku
100, millest enamiku moodustavad putkkirved, kuid on ka moni uksik
silmaga kirves (jn 6). Sirpide algset arvu on nende fragmentaarsuse ja
suure korrodeerumise tottu vaga keeruline maarata, kuid diagnostiliste
osade, s.o sirbi kandade ning tippude arvu alusel voiks nende hulgaks
maarata vastavalt 128 voi 176 eset (jn 7).
Lisaks esemeleidudele tuvastati pisikesi polenud luufragmente, mis
ilmselt kuuluvad koik loomaluude hulka, ja fragmente lamba polemata
alaloualuust. Samuti leidus kaevandi ja selle erinevate laiendite
piirkonnas rohkelt soemater-jali: nii esemete vahel soetukikestena kui
ka suuremate soestunud fragmentidena kaevandi pohjas. Lisaks avastati
puidujaanuseid mitmete kirveste ja odaotste putkedest, mis viitavad, et
esemed olid maha jaanud koos varrega (voi otsast maha murtud varrega).
Enamasti oli nende puhul tegemist lehtpuuga, esindatud olid nii kask kui
ka vaher.
Tanu orgaanilise materjali rohkusele--soeleiud kaevandi piires ja
puidujaanused esemete putkedes--onnestus kogutud materjali dateerida
AMS-meetodil (tabel 1, jn 8). Selle kaudu saadi ka esimesed esemetega
seostatavad orgaanika otsedateeringud, mis voimaldavad tapsustada
odaotste ja kirveste kronoloogiat. Kui enamasti on seda tuupi odaotsi ja
kirveid peetud rahvasterannuaja ning jargnevate perioodide leidudeks,
siis Kohtla materjal naitab, et vastavad esemetuubid ulatuvad vahemalt
rooma rauaaja, voimalik, et koguni eelrooma rauaaja loppjarku. Noorim
dateering on aga soekogum kaevandi laiendist, mis jaab 7.-9. sajandisse,
olles pohimotteliselt samaaegne leitud solepea ajalise maaranguga. Nii
saab vaita, et Kohtla leiu kasutusaeg jaab pikka ajavahemikku
ajaarvamise vahetusest viikingiaja alguseni.
Kuigi tanapaeval on leiukoha keskkonnaks tavaline pollumaa,
viitavad selle kunagisele seotusele margalaga nii leiupaiga toponuum
(Luharahva talu) kui ka kohalike inimeste malestused kunagisest
uleujutatud karjamaast. Veelgi enam, nii lidarikaardistuse (vt jn 1: A)
kui ka ajalooliste kaartide (jn 9) pohjal on naha, et leiukoha vahetus
laheduses on paiknenud suurem allikakoht, millest voolas valja vaike
jogi. Leiukeskkonna seotust vesise alaga kinnitasid ka valitoodel
teostatud tapsemad loodusteaduslikud analuusid.
Kohtla peitvara on oma umbes 400 esemega ja otseselt esemetega
seostatavate AMS-dateeringutega Eesti varaseim ning suurim omalaadne
rauaaegne leid. Tanu Kohtlale suurenes mitme esemetuubi, naiteks koplad,
sirbid ja putkkirved, arvukus tunduvalt. Oluliseks tuleb pidada ka
ainulaadset voimalust teha leiukohal pohjalikke arheoloogilisi valitoid,
mis voimaldasid tapselt dokumenteerida leiukogumit ja seda umbritsevat
keskkonda, koguda loodusteaduslikke proove ning teostada
laboritingimustes taiendavaid analuuse (AMS-dateeringud,
metallograafilised uuringud jne).
Kohtlale sarnaseid rauaaegseid leiukogumeid on Eestis teada umbes
pool tosinat: Alulinna, Kunda, Rikassaare, Igavere, Kaabe, Koorkula
Valgjarve ja Pohja-Eesti leid (vt ka tabel 2). Enamik nimetatuist kuulub
aga monevorra hilisemasse ajajarku ja neid on dateeritud peamiselt 6.-7.
sajandiga. Monevorra erandlikud on Virumaalt leitud Alulinna ja Kunda
kogumid, sest kuigi enamik esemeid neis kuulub nimetatud keskmise
rauaaja sajanditesse, leidub neis esemete kronoloogia pohjal ka
monevorra varasemaid ning hilisemaidki esemeid. Naib, et raudesemete
peitmine vesikeskkonda pika ajaperioodi valtel vois olla uks omalaadne
Virumaa rauaaegne fenomen.
Siiski pole Kohtla ja Virumaa leiud Laanemere regioonis unikaalsed.
Baltimaade kontekstis uletab Kohtla peitvara leiuarvukuselt uksnes
kuulus Lati Kokmuiza 5.-6. sajandi leid, kuid sarnaseid leide on teada
Latist-Leedust veel teisigi. Veelgi arvukamad on samalaadsed, peamiselt
relvadest, kuid moningal maaral samuti tooriistu sisaldavad leiukogumid
Skandinaavias. Neist kuulsaim on ilmselt Taani Illerupi leid, kuid vahem
tuntud pole ka Nydami, Hjortspringi, Vimose, Ejsboli, Thorsbergi,
Porskjaeri jt leiud. Neid rooma rauaaja ja monevorra varasemaid kogumeid
on tolgendatud kui sojasaagi, kas siis sissetungijate voi voorkaigul
kogutud vara ohverdusi.
Kohtla leiukogu tolgendus on monevorra keeruline. Rohked relvad
(eriti odaotsad) viitavad voimalikule seosele vagivaldsete
valiskontaktide ja sojategevusega. Selle tolgenduse kasuks raagib ka
asjaolu, et vahemasti moningaid esemetuupe (naiteks solg,
metallograafiliste uuringute pohjal ka osa kirvestest) leidub ka teistes
Laanemere regioonides. Kuid arvukad tooriistad samas leiukogus viitavad
aga teistsugustele, naiteks polluharimisega seotud
tolgendusvoimalustele. Tuleb ka silmas pidada, et Kohtla ohverduskoha
kasutusperiood ulatub ule mitme sajandi, s.o ajaarvamise vahetusest kuni
viikingiaja alguseni. Nii ehk polegi uleliia ullatav, et selle pika aja
valtel voisid konkreetsed esemete peitmispohjused varieeruda, kajastades
vastaval ajajargul uhiskonnas n-o aktuaalsemaid teemasid ja ulatudes
naiteks sojategevusega seotud rituaalidest viljakuskultuseni. On aga
tahelepanuvaarne, et suures osas jai ohverdatud esemete materjalivalik
(raud) samaks ja et sama paiga korduv kasutus usna sarnaseks tegevuseks
jatkus polvest polve vaga pika perioodi jooksul. Sellist uhe paiga
tahtsustamist, pikaajalist, kuid erineva funktsiooniga esemete (relvad,
tooriistad) kajastatud kasutust, naitlikustavad teisedki Virumaa sama
perioodi leiud, viidates sellele, et tegu vois olla Virumaa
spetsiifilise kultuurilise kaitumisega.
https://doi.org/10.3176/arch.2018.1.02
Ester Oras, Institute of History and Archaeology at the University
of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia; ester.oras@ut.ee
Aivar Kriiska, Institute of History and Archaeology at the
University of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia;
aivar.kriiska@ut.ee
Andres Kimber, Institute of History and Archaeology at the
University of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia;
andres.kimber@ut.ee
Kristiina Paavel, Institute of History and Archaeology at the
University of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia;
kristiina.paavel@ut.ee
Taisi Juus, Institute of History and Archaeology at the University
of Tartu, 18 Ulikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia; taisi.juus@ut.ee
(1) Identified by Eve Rannamae, University of Tartu.
(2) Identified by Regino Kask, Estonian University of Life
Sciences.
(3) Identified by Regino Kask, Estonian University of Life
Sciences.
(4) Other similar finds are e.g. Vecmokas and Kalnamuiza from
Latvia, and slightly later find of Sluostikiai from Lithuania (see
Uriahs 1977; Bliujiene 2010; Oras 2015 for details).
Table 1. AMS dated material from Kohtla deposit. Results calibrated
with OxCal v4.3.2 (Bronk Ramsey 2009) and the IntCal13 atmospheric
calibration curve (Reimer et al. 2013)
Artefact number Dated Context/relation
(TU 2309:) material to object
N/A Charcoal Wooden construction beneath
the deposit (Wood 1)
N/A Charcoal Wooden construction beneath
the deposit (Wood 2)
N/A Charcoal Wooden construction beneath
the deposit (Wood 3)
N/A Charcoal Wooden construction beneath
the deposit (Wood 4)
N/A Charcoal Charred remains in trench 1
extension (Wood 5)
53 Wood Spearhead (socket)
63 Wood Spearhead (socket)
65 Wood Spearhead (socket)
72 Wood Spearhead (socket)
240 Wood Axe (socket)
226 Wood Axe (socket)
249 Wood Axe (socket)
376 Charcoal Under the sickle
424 Charcoal Sickle
453 Charcoal Sickle
577 Charcoal Sickle
610 Charcoal Sickle
611 Charcoal Sickle
642 Charcoal Sickle
696, 697 Charcoal Under the pair of sickles
Artefact number Radiocarbon Calibrated age 95.4 Laboratory
(TU 2309:) age (2 sigma) number
N/A 1935 [+ or -] 29 AD 4-129 UBA-24557
N/A 1934 [+ or -] 31 22 BC-AD 133 UBA-24560
N/A 1901 [+ or -] 39 AD 23-220 UBA-27690
N/A 1929 [+ or -] 39 40 BC - AD 209 UBA-27691
N/A 1259 [+ or -] 29 AD 670-864 UBA-27693
53 1954 [+ or -] 65 111 BC - AD 225 UBA-29330
63 2107 [+ or -] 170 739 BC - AD 318 UBA-27684
65 2079 [+ or -] 52 347 BC - AD 49 UBA-29331
72 1883 [+ or -] 28 AD 65-218 UBA-27689
240 1920 [+ or -] 29 AD 5-135 UBA-27686
226 2063 [+ or -] 30 170 BC - AD 3 UBA-27681
249 1923 [+ or -] 30 AD 2-136 UBA-27688
376 1889 [+ or -] 31 AD 55-220 UBA-27692
424 1964 [+ or -] 27 41 BC - AD 85 UBA-27679
453 1788 [+ or -] 30 AD 134-330 UBA-27680
577 1972 [+ or -] 35 47 BC - AD 120 UBA-27683
610 1781 [+ or -] 30 AD 138-334 UBA-24558
611 1767 [+ or -] 25 AD 144-346 UBA-24559
642 1778 [+ or -] 38 AD 132-345 UBA-27687
696, 697 1967 [+ or -] 30 43 BC - AD 115 UBA-27682
Table 2. Iron weapons-tools deposits from Estonia. Provided are the
minimum number of specific object types according to their preservation
in contemporary storage collections
Wealth Typo-chronological Environment Swords Axes Battle
Deposit dating of artefacts Knives
(AD)
Rikassaare 550-650 River 7
Igavere 500-700 Marsh 1 5
Kaabe 400-800 River 1 1
Koorkula 700-900 Spring 1
Valgjarv
Kunda I lst-3rd; Bog 1 9
6th-7th century
Alulinn 2nd-3rd; 6th-7th; Bog 3 13
12th/13th century
North- 2nd-7th century N/A 3 5
Estonia
Kohtla- ca 1 st century Marsh 100
Vanakula BC-8th/9th century
Wealth Spearheads Other Horse Sickles/ Other Other Iron
Deposit Weapons Gear Scythe Tools Objects
Rikassaare 54
Igavere 1 1 1 1 7
Kaabe
Koorkula 3 1 1
Valgjarv
Kunda I 5 2 6
Alulinn 51 27 1 3
North- 21 51
Estonia
Kohtla- 122 128 18 13
Vanakula (176)
Wealth Comments
Deposit
Rikassaare
Igavere 7 iron plates from
possible cauldron
Kaabe Very wide date range
of objects
Koorkula 1 shear (lost), fragment
Valgjarv of iron artefact.
1 bronze coin (lost)
Kunda I 2 coal trowels, 2 iron
plates from possible
cauldron, 4 fragments
of iron artefacts
Alulinn 1 harpoon, 3 fragments
of iron artefacts
North-
Estonia
Kohtla- 12 knives, 3 hoes.
Vanakula 1 hammer, 2 strike-a-
light stones, 1 brooch,
2 mounts, 1 rivet.
1 glass bead, 1 buckle.
7 iron rings
[Please note: Some non-Latin characters were omitted from this
article]
COPYRIGHT 2018 Estonian Academy Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.