Resilience in the Wake of Disasters: A Two-Wave Qualitative Study of Survivors of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake.
O'Grady, Kari A. ; Stewart, Carol ; Orton, James Douglas 等
Resilience in the Wake of Disasters: A Two-Wave Qualitative Study of Survivors of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake.
On January 12, 2010, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck Haiti,
leaving approximately 220,000 people dead, 300,000 people injured, and
1.5 million people displaced (CNN Library, 2017). For years, many (if
not most) of the survivors have struggled to make sense of this
catastrophic event. In the current article, we present results from a
two-wave qualitative study of the resilience processes utilized by adult
survivors of this 2010 Haiti earthquake. These findings inform a process
model of resilience in a postdisaster context. We describe each of the
emergent themes from this model, including specific quotes to illustrate
each theme. Finally, we discuss implications for practice and provide
recommendations for future research.
Trauma and Resilience
Resilience refers to "an outcome of successful adaptation to
adversity" (Zautra, Hall, & Murray, 2010, p. 3). Resilient
processes are traditionally categorized into two types: recovery
processes (i.e., "[processes related to] how well people bounce
back and recover fully from challenge," Zautra et al., 2010, p.)
and sustainability processes (i.e., "[processes related to] the
capacity to continue forward in the face of adversity," Zautra et
al., 2010, p. 4). These processes can be characteristics of individuals,
groups (e.g., communities), or situations (Zautra et al., 2010). In this
study, we will focus on resilience processes employed by individuals in
the wake of a disaster. In particular, we will explore the resilience
processes adult disaster survivors use in their attempts to navigate how
a catastrophic event has disrupted their cosmology--that is, their
beliefs (i.e., overarching worldview) about the world and their place in
it (Weick, 1993).
For instance, the emotional processing theory of Posttraumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD) holds that people with more rigid (as opposed to
more flexible) pretrauma belief systems are more inclined to develop
PTSD following the experience of a traumatic event (Foa & Rothbaum,
1998; Park, Mills, & Edmondson, 2012). Tedeschi and Calhoun's
(2004) theory of posttraumatic growth (PTG) advanced the notion that
people can experience positive change due to struggling with adversity,
and research supporting this theory has found that, if trauma-exposed
people reexamine their trauma-disrupted core beliefs, then they are less
likely to develop PTSD and more likely report experiencing perceived PTG
(Triplett, Tedeschi, Cann, Calhoun, & Reeve, 2012). More recently,
Park and colleagues' meaning making model (Park, 2010; Park,
Currier, Harris, & Slattery, 2017) has conceptualized trauma
recovery as occurring when survivors reconcile their situational meaning
of a traumatic event with their global meaning, using adaptive
assimilation or accommodation processes.
In a landmark article, Bonanno (2004) challenged the premise that
trauma-exposed people are more prone to develop PTSD from trauma than to
exhibit resilience to trauma. He differentiated resilience from
recovery, reviewed the empirical evidence that resilience is actually
quite common, and discussed how there are varied and oftentimes
unexpected pathways to resilience. Bonanno's (2004) article was
effective in prompting trauma researchers to re-engage in exploring the
previously overlooked topic of resilience. Since then, the scientific
study of resilience has grown exponentially (Kumar, 2016; Lightsey,
2006; Park et al., 2017; Reich, Zautra, & Hall, 2010; Wong, 2012).
Disasters, Resilience, and Spirituality
Within this line of research, one focus of attention has been the
empirical study of resilience in a disaster context (Bonanno &
Gupta, 2009), and some of those studies have examined the role of
religion/spirituality as a source of resilience and meaning making in
the wake of disasters (Park, 2016b; cf. Park, 2016a, Park et al., 2017).
Indeed, research has shown that when people experience a disaster (i.e.,
"a potentially traumatic event that is collectively experienced,
has an acute onset, and is time-delimited," McFarlane & Norris,
2006, p. 4), they often struggle to make sense of their new postdisaster
realities, and religion/spirituality help them toward that end (Park,
2016b; cf. Park et al., 2017). Disasters and traumatic events can
disrupt foundational aspects of people's understanding of the
world, compelling them to reconsider their core beliefs (i.e.,
cosmology) against the backdrop of their current circumstances (Groleau,
Calhoun, Cann, Tedeschi, 2013; Janoff-Bulman, 1992).
Psychologist and organizational theorist Weick (1993) coined the
term "cosmology episodes" (p. 633) to describe such events. He
explained:
A cosmology episode occurs when people suddenly and deeply feel
that the universe is no longer a rational, orderly system. What makes
such an episode so shattering is that both the sense of what is
occurring and the means to rebuild that sense collapse together. (Weick,
1993, p. 633)
In other words, a cosmology episode represents the deep and sudden
"collapse" of sensemaking (i.e., how people provide meaning to
their experiences), because the traumatic has shattered one's core
beliefs and assumptions (Janoff-Bulman, 1992; Weick, 1993). That
cosmology episodes strike at these core aspects of human experience, it
is no surprise that such episodes will often require people to address
fundamental existential and religious/spiritual questions if they are to
rebuild their lives and respond resiliently (O'Grady & Orton,
2016; Park, 2016a).
The Current Study
There is growing empirical evidence that most disaster-exposed
adults demonstrate resilience (Bonanno, Brewin, Kaniasty, & La
Greca, 2010; Bonanno, Galea, Bucciarelli, & Vlahov, 2007; Bonanno
& Gupta, 2009). What is less clear are the processes which they do
so. There also is very limited research on postdisaster resilience in
disaster contexts outside the U.S. Hence, the current two-wave
qualitative study was conducted primarily to explore the resilience
processes utilized by adult survivors of the 2010 Haiti earthquake.
Secondarily, because the vast majority of Haitians believe in a higher
power and consider religion/spirituality to be a fundamental component
of their cosmologies (O'Grady, Orton, Schreiber-Pan, & Wismick,
2013; O'Grady, Rollison, Hanna, Schreiber-Pan, & Ruiz, 2012),
this study was also designed to explore how survivors'
religion/spirituality intersected with their postdisaster resilience
processes.
We chose to utilize a qualitative approach for this study, because
there has been so little research in this area to date and because a
qualitative approach is well suited for exploratory and process-focused
research. Qualitative research is also well suited for cross-cultural
research, given its historic emphasis on contextualization of research
questions and findings (Denzin & Lincoln, 2011).
Methods
Participants
To study our research questions, we recruited participants in
person through purposive sampling in religious communities, tent
communities, and educational institutions in Portau-Prince and its
surrounding areas (e.g., Petion-Ville, Croix-des-Missions), which all
were heavily impacted by the earthquake. Indeed, all recruited
participants had experienced some level of loss (e.g., property damage,
loss of loved ones, etc.; see O'Grady, Orton, White, & Snyder,
2016, for a description of the broader project of which this study was a
part). The study's three inclusion criteria were that all
participants had to (a) be at least 18 years old, (b) have been a
survivor of the 2010 Haiti earthquake, and (c) report (on the
demographics form) that the disaster had disrupted their sensemaking.
We conducted this interview study at two time points: Time 1 was
6-months postdisaster, and Time 2 was 3-years postdisaster. At Time 1
there were 42 participants (19 men [45%], 23 women [55%]), and at Time 2
there were 40 participants (18 men [45%], 22 women [55%]). Most Time 2
participants (n = 34) had participated in the study at Time 1; however,
some Time 1 participants (n = 8) could not be located at Time 2. In
those cases, we recruited a Time 2 participant who had similar
demographic characteristics (e.g., was the same sex and roughly the same
age) as the Time 1 participant whom we could not locate. Because some of
the Time 1 participants could not be located at Time 2, we have
refrained from referring to this study as a longitudinal qualitative
study; instead, we refer to it as a two-wave qualitative study.
At Time 1 the average age of participants was 28.3 years (SD =
11.7), and at Time 2 the average age was 30.7 years (SD =11.4). All Time
1 and Time 2 participants were of African ethnic descent, thereby
reflecting the ethnic composition of Haiti (Central Intelligence Agency,
n.d.). In terms of religious affiliation, participants were Roman
Catholic Christian (ns = 22 at Time 1, 23 at Time 2),
Mormon/Latter-Day-Saint Christian (ns = 19 and 15, respectively), and
Protestant Christian (ns = 1 and 2, respectively). (Almost 90% of the
Haitian population has a Christian religious affiliation [Pew Research
Center, 2017].) Of note, it is likely that many participants
additionally engaged in some folk religious practices (e.g., voodoo
rituals; Central Intelligence Agency, n.d.), but they did not
spontaneously report about such practices. The primary language of all
participants was Creole (the native language of Haiti); only 5% of
participants had proficiency in the English language.
Data Collection
The Time 1 interview questions were developed by the first through
fifth authors, based on their expertise in the trauma literature and in
conducting cross-cultural trauma research. The Time 1 semistructured
interview protocol consisted of 9 questions, asking about people's
psychological, social, and religious/spiritual experiences with the
earthquake. Two example questions are: What has your experience been
like since the earthquake? and What helps you cope with the
difficulties? Time 1 interviews were conducted in person in July 2010
(6-months postdisaster). Interviews were conducted individually in
churches, tent communities, homes, schools, and parks, and they lasted
from 30 to 90 minutes. Because the primary language of all participants
was Creole (the native language of Haiti) and only 5% of participants
had proficiency in the English language, all interviews were conducted
through the assistance of competent translators. Subsequently, the
audio-recorded interview was translated and transcribed verbatim into
English by the sixth author (who is from Haiti, speaks Creole as his
primary language, has advanced proficiency in the English language, and
has 2 years of training in English language translation).
Before conducting the Time 2 interviews, the first through fifth
authors (and doctoral-student members of their respective research
teams) traveled to Port-au-Prince and met with a doctoral-level Haitian
professor and four student members of his research team. The Haitian
research team provided feedback about the cultural appropriateness and
relevance of the Time 1 interview questions. As part of this feedback,
they suggested semantic revisions such as replacing the word
"cope" with the word "sustain" (e.g., What helps you
cope with the difficulties? was revised to Does anything help sustain
you through the difficult times? Please explain?). After two days of
discussion, everyone was satisfied with the revised version of the
interview protocol. This Time 2 semistructured interview protocol is
presented in Appendix A.
Time 2 interviews were again conducted in person and individually,
in churches, tent communities, homes, schools, and parks. As before,
these interviews lasted from 30 to 90 minutes, were conducted through
the assistance of a translator, and the audio-recorded interview was
subsequently translated and transcribed verbatim into English.
Data Analysis
For data analysis, we used a qualitative content analysis strategy
(Hsieh & Shannon, 2005). specifically, we utilized a directed
content-analysis strategy, which "starts with a theory or relevant
research findings as guidance for initial codes" (Hsieh &
Shannon, 2005, p. 1277). Data analysis began with the first and second
author (Ph.D.-level researchers with a high level of expertise on the
topic) conducting an extensive review of the scientific literature on
cosmology episodes. (The results of this review are published in Orton
and O'Grady, 2016, which presents a qualitative meta-analysis of
164 articles on cosmology episodes). This meta-analytic review revealed
that resilience during cosmology episodes tends to involve five related
yet distinct resilience processes: (a) anticipating (beliefs, resources,
and practices that are in place prior to the triggering event), (b)
sense-losing (the collapse of aspects of the cosmology in response to
the triggering event), (c) improvising (creative, collaborative problem
solving to reconstruct meaning), (d) sense-remaking (rebuilding a
suitable cosmology), and (e) renewing processes (processes in place as
one moves forward in life; Orton & O'Grady, 2016). Therefore,
the current study's directed content-analysis coding proceeded with
these five categories of resilience processes as the guide for our
initial coding of themes.
The coding team was comprised of the first and second author and
their research team (three Ph.D. students and two master's
students) that studies trauma and resilience. Each Time 1 and Time 2
interview transcript was coded independently by three members of the
coding team. Coding was conducted using a software program. The initial
coding was conducted line by line, by using clarifying codes that arose
from the data and by highlighting significant statements. The coding
team met regularly for peer debriefing, in order to compare coded
transcripts for consistency, identify themes and patterns, and discuss
instances of coding discrepancy or uncertainty. In such instances, the
lead author's extensive experience conducting research with
Haitians was drawn upon to provide contextual information that could
help guide coding decisions. During coding and deliberations, a
devil's advocate was assigned, in order to mitigate the potential
for groupthink in analysis. The data was triangulated with quantitative
findings conducted at Time 1 and Time 2 (e.g., O'Grady et al.,
2012) and with literature on the topic (e.g., Orton & O'Grady,
2016) to enhance the methodological integrity (fidelity and utility) of
the data.
Results
Data analysis yielded themes for four of the five overarching
resilience processes: sense-losing, improvising, sense-remaking, and
renewing. Themes for anticipating processes would likely have emerged
too, if the interview protocol had contained questions asking about
survivors' resources, beliefs, and practices prior to the
earthquake. However, such questions were not included at Time 1 and thus
were not asked at Time 2 either, in order to maintain a level of
consistency (reliability) between the interview protocols.
Emergent themes (with supporting quotes) are presented in Table 1.
The themes that emerged as characterizing resilient sense-losing were:
(a) courage, (b) acceptance, (c) spiritual endurance, and (d) social
support. Next, the themes that emerged as characterizing resilient
improvising were: (a) creative imagination, (b) spiritual identity, (c)
divine intervention, and (d) collaborative coping (with God and others).
Third, the themes that emerged as characterizing resilient
sense-remaking were: (a) positive reappraisal, (b) sense of purpose, (c)
spiritual devotion, and (d) community outreach. Lastly, the themes that
emerged as characterizing resilient renewing were: (a) new identity, (b)
increased courage, (c) increased altruism, (d) increased sense of
community, (e) increased strength, (f) increased knowledge, and (g)
increased faith.
Not all participants exhibited postdisaster resilience and growth,
however. On the contrary, some (albeit a small minority) exhibited
posttraumatic depreciation (Marshall, Frazier, Frankfurt, & Kuijer,
2015). Content analysis revealed that this depreciation was
characterized by rigid psychological processes--specifically, by rigid
sense-losing, improvising, sense-remaking, and renewing. For these
processes, emergent themes (with supporting quotes) are presented in
Table 2. The themes that emerged as characterizing rigid sense-losing
were: (a) fear, (b) negative appraisal, (c) disengagement, and (d)
denial and disassociation. Next, the themes that emerged as
characterizing rigid improvising were: (a) deferring coping (with God
and others), (b) self-directing coping, (c) maladaptive conservation of
beliefs, and (d) stagnant imagination. Third, the themes that emerged as
characterizing rigid sense-remaking were: (a) sense of abandonment (b)
isolation, and (c) hopelessness. Lastly, the themes that emerged as
characterizing rigid renewing were: (a) decreased self-efficacy, (b)
decreased faith (c) decreased resources, and (d) general resignation.
Discussion
This two-wave qualitative study contributes to the literature on
postdisaster psychosocial resilience by identifying what characterizes
the resilient processes survivors engage in to recover and move forward
in the wake of disasters. More broadly, it advances understanding of the
role that religion/spirituality can play in people's postdisaster
resilience (Park, 2016b; cf. Pargament & Cummings, 2010), and it
advances cross-cultural understanding of postdisaster resilience.
The themes that emerged are resonant with existing theory and
research on cosmology episodes (Orton & O'Grady, 2016), adult
resilience (Bonanno, 2004; Bonanno et al., 2007, 2010; Bonanno &
Gupta, 2009; Zautra et al., 2010), religious coping (Pargament et al.,
1988; Pargament, Koenig, & Perez, 2000), meaning making (Park,
2016a, 2016b; Park et al., 2017), PTG (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004;
Triplett et al., 2012), and posttraumatic depreciation (Marshall et al.,
2015). For instance, the themes that emerged suggest there are related
yet distinct resilience processes that characterize people's
responses to a disaster (Orton & O'Grady, 2016). Results also
supported the finding that most adults exhibit resilience in the face of
adversity generally (Bonanno, 2004) and disaster-related adversity
specifically (Bonanno et al., 2007, 2010; Bonanno & Gupta, 2009).
Furthermore, in line with Pargament and colleagues' theorizing
and research on religious coping and problem solving (Pargament et al.,
1988, 2000), results revealed there are resilient forms of religious
coping and problem solving (e.g., collaborative coping, positive
reappraisal) and nonresilient forms of religious coping and problem
solving (e.g., deferring coping and self-directing coping). Likewise,
results supported theory and research on Park and colleagues'
meaning making model (Park, 2010, 2016a, 2016b; Park et al., 2017), in
that resilient survivors tended to engage in adaptive processes of
assimilation (e.g., spiritual identity) or accommodation (e.g., new
identity), whereas nonresilient survivors tended to engage in
maladaptive processes of assimilation (e.g., maladaptive conservation of
beliefs) or accommodation (e.g., resignation). In the same way, results
supported theory and research on PTG (Taku, Cann, Tedeschi, &
Calhoun, 2015; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004; Triplett et al., 2012). For
example, resilient survivors seemed to have engaged in adaptive forms of
deliberate rumination (e.g., divine intervention, positive reappraisal),
and they reported having (a) better relationships (e.g., social support,
increased sense of community), (b) a stronger religious/spiritual life
(e.g., spiritual devotion, increased faith), (c) greater personal
strength (e.g., increased strength, increased courage), (d) shifted
priorities (e.g., community outreach, increased altruism), and (e)
increased life appreciation (e.g., sense of purpose).
In contrast, nonresilient survivors exhibited rigid psychological
processes that seemed to contribute to their posttraumatic depreciation
(Marshall et al., 2015; Triplett et al., 2012), consistent with
emotional processing theory of PTSD (Foa & Rothbaum, 1998; Park et
al., 2012). For instance, one participant exhibited rigid sense-losing
that manifested as denial and disassociation. Both at Time 1 (6-months
postdisaster) and Time 2 (3-years postdisaster), this 25-year-old woman
reported she was unable to feel any emotion. She described how she
continued to attend church, but it was an emotionless experience for
her, which was in stark contrast to the joy she consistently experienced
at church prior to the earthquake.
Religious and spiritual beliefs were at the core of most (if not
all) participants' cosmologies, and as disasters often do, the
catastrophic nature of this earthquake thrust many survivors into a
state of freefall in which they had to "negotiate difficult
existential and spiritual questions [in order to reconstruct] a new and
coherent life narrative" (Bray, 2010, p. 304). To illustrate, in
the current study, one male survivor recalled an experience immediately
following the disaster. He witnessed religious leaders and local
government workers leave a young seminarian to die but instead
"rescue" the body of a dead Brazial woman pinned next to him.
This participant said that, for a while after the disaster, he struggled
with the ruminative thought: "Usually it is the living that are
rescued, not the dead." For well over a year postdisaster, that
thought played over and over like a tape in his head. But eventually,
after months of deliberate rumination, he restored his predisaster
belief in a just God and just government. In fact, at Time 2 (3-years
postdisaster), he proclaimed: "I have redefined myself and ... my
relationships with other people." He described drawing upon this
newly defined relationship with God to help him foster positive momentum
for his community.
Importantly, our study's findings were similar to results from
prior studies with earthquake survivors. For example, in a study of
adult survivors of the 2015 Nepal earthquake, Itzhaky, Weiss-Dagan, and
Taubman-Ben-Ari (2017) found that survivors with higher coping and
cognitive flexibility demonstrated better postdisaster resilience (e.g.,
lower PTSD symptoms). In the current study, one educator described the
improvising resilience process of a young student she knew who had lost
his arm in the earthquake: "When somebody was discouraged, I said:
'Well, look at Gason [pseudonym]! Before [the earthquake], he wrote
with his right hand, but now he writes with his left hand.'"
Another participant described how she engaged in an improvising process
of innovatively planting trees, partly to help mitigate future
disaster-related flood damage and partly to create a more sustainable
future for Haiti.
In another study, Fu, Chow, Li, and Cong (2017) found that, among
adolescent survivors of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China, their
postdisaster psychological well-being (i.e., postdisaster resilience)
was related to their emotional and cognitive flexibility. In addition,
Taku and colleagues' (2015) previous research with adult survivors
of the 2011 Japan earthquake found evidence that adaptive deliberate
rumination was linked to survivors' level of perceived PTG (i.e.,
postdisaster resilience). Zhou, Wu, Fu, and An (2015) replicated this
finding in a study of adolescent survivors of the 2008 Wenchuan
earthquake. Taken together, our study's findings are consistent
with these previous findings and suggest that adaptive deliberate
rumination and psychological flexibility may be core ingredients of
postdisaster resilience.
Our findings are also consistent with research that social support
(e.g., from family and friends) and religious support (e.g., from God
and fellow members of a faith community) are core ingredients of
postdisaster resilience (Aten et al., 2018; Prati & Pietrantoni,
2009). For instance, in large studies of disaster survivors in China and
the United States, Bonanno and colleagues (2007, 2008) have found
evidence that social support is one of the main contributors to adult
survivors' postdisaster resilience. Correspondingly, in a study of
child survivors of the 2010 Chilean earthquake, Garfin and colleagues
(2014) found that postdisaster declines in psychological well-being were
associated with lack of perceived social support from caregivers.
Similarly, in their longitudinal population-level study of survivors of
the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake, Sibley and Bulbulia (2012)
found that the loss of faith was the strongest predictor of declines in
survivors' psychological well-being. In particular, there is
growing evidence that religious support may play an especially important
role in promoting the postdisaster resilience of survivors of African
ethnic descent (Ai et al., 2013; Hackbarth, Pavkov, Wetchler, &
Flannery, 2012; Laditka, Murray, & Laditka, 2010; Leavell, Aten,
& Boan, 2012). Such a finding is unsurprising, given the central
role of religion and spirituality in the lives of people of African
descent around the world (Mattis & Grayman-Simpson, 2013).
Limitations
Our study has some limitations that need to be noted. First of all,
as with most qualitative research, our sample size was relatively small.
Also, not all Time 1 survivors could be located to participate in the
study at Time 2. Third, our sample only consisted of religiously
affiliated adult survivors; hence, conclusions about child disaster
survivors or nonreligiously affiliated adult disaster survivors cannot
be made. Furthermore, our sample only included Haitians, so conclusions
about disaster survivors from other countries should be made with
caution. Similarly, our sample only consisted of earthquake survivors,
so conclusions about survivors of other types of disasters should be
made with caution as well. Methodologically, there were several
limitations too: (a) we did not use the exact same interview protocol at
Times 1 and 2, (b) our data collection was of course limited by the
exact questions we asked interviewees, (c) we used a specific
theoretical framework (i.e., Orton and O'Grady's [2016]
framework of cosmology episode resilience processes) to guide data
analysis, and (d) we used a content analysis strategy to analyze the
data. Consequently, another qualitative study of psychological
resilience processes might reveal somewhat different findings if a
different interview protocol was used, if a different theoretical
framework (or no theoretical framework) was used to guide data
collection and analysis, or if a different data-analytic strategy was
used (e.g., a grounded theory, narrative analysis, phenomenological,
ethnographic, or consensual qualitative research strategy).
Implications for Practice and Future Research
This study's findings have implications for providing disaster
spiritual and emotional care to disaster survivors (see Schruba et al.,
2018a, 2018b, this volume). For example, our findings highlight the
importance of incorporating religion/spirituality into efforts to
promote survivors' postdisaster mental health, especially if those
survivors are religiously affiliated. There are several resources that
can help inform such efforts, such as (a) Light Our Way: A Guide for
Spiritual Care in Times of Disaster (Massey, 2006), (b) Psychological
First Aid: Field Operations Guide for Community Religious Professionals
(Brymer et al., 2006), (c) Disaster Spiritual Care (2nd ed.; Roberts
& Ashley, 2017), and (d) Disaster Ministry Handbook (Aten &
Boan, 2016). There are other resources that are broader in scope but can
nonetheless help inform spiritually integrated mental health care
following a disaster, such as (a) Trauma, Meaning, and Spirituality:
Translating Research Into Practice (Park et al., 2017); (b) Spiritually
Oriented Psychotherapy for Trauma (Walker, Courtois, & Aten, 2015);
(c) Treating Trauma in Christian Counseling (Gingrich & Gingrich,
2017); and (d) Spiritually Oriented Interventions for Counseling and
Psychotherapy (Aten, McMinn, & Worthington, 2011).
Our findings also suggest that disaster spiritual and emotional
care providers should concentrate on promoting some of the core
resilience ingredients we mentioned previously: psychological
flexibility, adaptive deliberate rumination, and enhanced social and
religious support. Meaning-enhancing interventions (e.g., Park et al.,
2017; Shin & Steger, 2014), interventions that focus on cultivating
psychological flexibility (e.g., acceptance and commitment therapy;
Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 2012), and social support interventions
(Hogan, Linden, & Najarian, 2002) may be especially effective with
disaster survivors too.
Future research could explore these possibilities, both through
outcome research (e.g., evaluating the effectiveness of certain
approaches to disaster spiritual and emotional care in promoting
postdisaster resilience) and process research (e.g., evaluating what
change mechanisms are responsible for such psychotherapeutic
effectiveness). In addition, future researchers could address some of
this study's limitations, thereby advancing the scientific study of
resilience processes generally and in postdisaster contexts
specifically. Moreover, researchers could continue to advance the
scientific study of resilience in cross-cultural contexts (O'Grady,
2016; O'Grady et al., 2016). We are excited to see what such
research reveals.
Conclusion
Field studies on disasters can challenge even the most robust
researchers. The traumatic nature of disasters (which at times take
place on foreign ground) discourages many researchers from investigating
the people who experience disasters. Those researchers who do attempt to
study populations in the aftermath of trauma often feel uncertain about
which constructs to study and what is the best means for capturing those
constructs. The qualitative study of cosmology episodes provides a
framework for explicitly addressing fundamental features of the human
experience following disasters, including the role of spirituality
"for the threatened entity (what now is my role in the universe?),
for the source of improvising (what now am i able to do to respond to
the event?), and for the reestablished entity (what now is my different
role in the universe?)" (Orton & O'Grady, 2016, p. 112).
References
Ai, A. L., Lemieux, C., Richardson, R., Tice, T. N., Plummer, C.,
Huang, B., & Ellison, C. G. (2013). Character strengths and deep
connections following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Spiritual and secular
pathways to resistance among volunteers. Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion, 52, 537-556.
Aten, J. D., & Boan, D. (2016). Disaster ministry handbook.
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Aten, J. D., McMinn, M. R., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2011).
Spiritually oriented interventions for counseling and psychotherapy.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Aten, J. D., Smith, W., Davis, E. B., Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N.,
Davis, D. E., Shannonhouse, L., DeBlaere, C., Ranter, J., O'Grady,
K., & Hill, P. (2018). The psychological study of religion and
spirituality in a disaster context: A systematic review. Manuscript
submitted for publication.
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we
underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive
events? American Psychologist, 59, 20-28.
Bonanno, G. A., Brewin, C. R., Kaniasty, K., & La Greca, A. M.
(2010). Weighing the costs of disaster: Consequences, risks, and
resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychological
Science in the Public Interest, 11, 1-49.
Bonanno, G. A., Galea, S., Bucciarelli, A., & Vlahov, D.
(2007). What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role
of demographics, resources, and life stress. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 75, 671-682.
Bonanno, G. A., & Gupta, S. (2009). Resilience after disaster.
In Y. Neria, S. Galea, & F. H. Norris (Eds.), Mental health and
disasters (pp. 145-160). New York, NY: Cambridge university Press.
Bonanno, G. A., Ho, S. M., Chan, J. C. K., Kwong, R. S. Y., Cheung,
C. K. Y., Wong, C. P., & Wong, V. C. W. (2008). Psychological
resilience and dysfunction among hospitalized survivors of the SARS
epidemic in Hong Kong: A latent class approach. Health Psychology, 27,
659-667.
Bray, P. (2010). A broader framework for exploring the influence of
spiritual experience in the wake of stressful life events: Examining
connections between posttraumatic growth and psycho-spiritual
transformation. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 293-308.
Brymer, M., Jacobs, A., Layne, C., Pynoos, R., Ruzek, J.,
Steinberg, A., Vernberg, E., & Watson, P. (2006). Psychological
first aid: Field operations guide for community religious professionals.
National Child Traumatic Stress Network and National Center for PTSD.
Retrieved from http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pd
fs/CRP-PFA_Guide.pdf
Central Intelligence Agency. (n.d.). Haiti. The world factbook.
Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook/geos/ha.html
CNN Library. (2017, December 20). Haiti earthquake fast facts.
Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2013/12/12/world/haitiearthquake-fast-facts/index.html
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011) The SAGE handbook of
qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Foa, E. B., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1998). Treating the trauma of
rape: Cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD. New York, NY: Guilford
Press.
Fu, F., Chow, A., Li, J., & Cong, Z. (2017). Emotional
flexibility: Development and application of a scale in adolescent
earthquake survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice,
and Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/tra0000278
Garfin, D. R., Silver, R., Gil-Rivas, V., Guzman, J., Murphy, J.
M., ... Guzman, M. P. (2014). Children's reactions to the 2010
Chilean earthquake: The role of trauma exposure, family context, and
school-based mental health programming. Psychological Trauma: Theory,
Research, Practice, and Policy, 6, 563-573.
Gingrich, H. D., & Gingrich, F. C. (Eds.). (2017). Treating
trauma in Christian counseling. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Groleau, J. M., Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., & Tedeschi, R. G.
(2013). The role of centrality of events in posttraumatic distress and
posttraumatic growth. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice,
and Policy, 5, 477-483.
Hackbarth, M., Pavkov, T., Wetchler, J., & Flannery, M. (2012).
Natural disasters: An assessment of family resiliency following
Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 340-351.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012).
Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful
change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hogan, B. E., Linden, W., & Najarian, B. (2002). Social support
interventions: Do they work. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 381-440.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to
content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.
Itzhaky, H., Weiss-Dagan, S., Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2017). Internal
and community resources' contribution to level of posttraumatic
symptoms: The case of tourists after the earthquake in Nepal, 2015.
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance
online publication. doi: 10.1037/tra0000280
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York, NY: Free
Press.
Kumar, U. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge international handbook of
psychosocial resilience. New York, NY: Routledge.
Laditka, S. B., Murray, L. M, & Laditka, J. N. (2010). In the
eye of the storm: Resilience and vulnerability among African American
women in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Health Care for Women
International, 31, 1013-1027.
Leavell, K., Aten, J. D., & Boan, D. (2012). The lived coping
experiences of South Mississippi and New Orleans clergy affected by
Hurricane Katrina: An exploratory study. Journal of Psychology &
Theology, 40, 336-348.
Lightsey, O. R., Jr. (2006). Resilience, meaning, and well-being.
The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 96-107.
Marshall, E. M., Frazier, P., Frankfurt, S., & Kuijer, R. G.
(2015). Trajectories of posttraumatic growth and depreciation after two
major earthquakes. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and
Policy, 7, 112-121.
Massey, K. (2006). Light our way: A guide for spiritual care in
times of disaster. Alexandria, VA: National Voluntary Organizations
Active in Disaster. Retrieved from
www.nvoad.org/wpcontent/uploads/dlm_uploads/2014/.../Light-Our-
Way-2013.pdf
Mattis, J. S., & Grayman-Simpson, N. A. (2013). Faith and the
sacred in African American life. In K. I. Pargament (Ed.), APA handbook
of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Vol. 1. Context, theory, and
research (pp. 547-564). Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
McFarlane, A. C., & Norris, F. H. (2006). Definitions and
concepts in disaster research. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J.
Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health
research (pp. 3-19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
O'Grady, K. A. (2016). Spirituality in resilience across
international contexts: An introduction. Journal of Psychology &
Theology, 44, 107-108.
O'Grady, K. A., & Orton, J. D. (2016). Resilience during
cosmology episodes: Lessons learned from the Haiti earthquake. Journal
of Psychology & Theology, 44, 109-123.
O'Grady, K. A., Orton, J. D., Schreiber-Pan, H., &
Wismick, J.C. (2013). Community trauma and the Posttraumatic
Transformation Model. International Psychology Bulletin, 17, 45-54.
O'Grady, K. A., Orton, J. D., White, K., & Snyder, N.
(2016). A way forward for spirituality, resilience, and international
social science. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 44, 166-172.
O'Grady, K. A., Rollison, D. G., Hanna, T. S., Schreiber-Pan,
H., & Ruiz, M. A. (2012). Earthquake in Haiti: Relationship with the
sacred in times of trauma. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 40,
289-301.
Orton, J. D. & O'Grady, K. A. (2016). Cosmology episodes:
A reconceptualization. Journal of Management, Spirituality, &
Religion, 13, 226-245.
Pargament, K. I. & Cummings, J. (2010). Anchored by faith:
Religion as a resilience factor. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J.
S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 193-210). New York,
NY: Guilford Press.
Pargament, K. I., Kennell, J., Hathaway, W., Grevengoed, N.,
Newman, J., & Jones, W. (1988). Religion and the problem-solving
process: Three styles of coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of
Religion, 27, 90-104.
Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The
many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of
the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 519-543.
Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An
integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to
stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 257-301.
Park, C. L. (2016a). Meaning making and resilience. u. Kumar (Ed.),
The Routledge international handbook of psychosocial resilience (pp.
162-172). New York, NY: Routledge.
Park, C. L. (2016b). Meaning making in the context of disasters.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 1234-1246.
Park, C. L., Currier, J.M., Harris, J.I., & Slattery, J.M.
(2017). Trauma, meaning, and spirituality: Translating research into
clinical practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Park, C. L., Mills, M. A., & Edmondson, D. (2012). PTSD as
meaning violation: Testing a cognitive worldview perspective.
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(1),
66-73.
Pew Research Center. (2017). The changing global religious
landscape. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from
http://www.pewforum.org/
2017/04/05/the-changing-global-religious-landscape/
Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L. (2009). Optimism, social support,
and coping strategies as factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: A
meta-analysis. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14, 364-388.
Reich, J. W., Zautra, A., & Hall, J. S. (Eds.). (2010).
Handbook of adult resilience. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Roberts, S. B., & Ashley, W. W. C., Sr. (2017). Disaster
spiritual care (2nd ed). Nashville, TN: SkyLight Paths Publishing.
Schruba, A. N., Aten, J. D., Davis, E. B., & Shannonhouse, L.
R. (2018a). A grounded theory of the practice of disaster spiritual and
emotional care: The central role of practical presence. Journal of
Psychology & Christianity, 37, 57-73.
Schruba, A. N., Davis, E. B., Aten, J. D., Wang, D. C., Entwistle,
D. N., & Boan, D. (2018b). Psychological first aid and the role of
scientific evidence Christians' provision of disaster spiritual and
emotional care. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 37, 74-79.
Shin, J. Y., & Steger, M. F. (2014). Promoting meaning and
purpose in life. In A. C. Parks & S. Schueller (Eds.), The Wiley
Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 90-110).
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sibley, C. G., & Bulbulia, J. (2012). Faith after an
earthquake: A longitudinal study of religion and perceived health before
and after the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake. PLoS ONE, 7(12):
e49648. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049648
Taku, K., Cann, A., Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2015).
Core beliefs shaken by an earthquake correlate with posttraumatic
growth. Psychological Trauma, Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 7,
563-569.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth:
Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry,
15, 1-18.
Triplett, K. N., Tedeschi, R. G., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., &
Reeve, C. L. (2012). Posttraumatic growth, meaning in life, and life
satisfaction in response to trauma. Psychological Trauma: Theory,
Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 400-410.
Walker, D. F., Courtois, C. A., & Aten, J. D. (2015).
Spiritually oriented psychotherapy for trauma. Washington DC: American
Psychological Association.
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations:
The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
Wong, P. T. (Ed.). (2012). The human quest for meaning: Theories,
research, and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Zautra, A. J., Hall, J. S., & Murray, K. E. (2010). Resilience:
A new definition of health for people and communities. In J. W. Reich,
A. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp.
3-29). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Zhou, X., Wu, X., Fu, F., & An, Y. (2015). Core belief
challenge and rumination as predictors of PTSD and PTG among adolescent
survivors of the Wenchuan earthquake. Psychological Trauma: Theory,
Research, Practice, and Policy, 7, 391-397.
Kari A. O'Grady
Carol Stewart
James Douglas Orton
William W Flythe
Loyola University Maryland
Nicole Snyder
Old Dominion University
Jean-Philippe Desius
LDS Emergency Response Haiti
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kari
A. O'Grady, Department of Pastoral Counseling, Loyola University
Maryland, 8890 McGaw Rd. Columbia, MD 21045; kaogrady@loyola.edu
Authors
Kari A. O'Grady (Ph.D. in Counseling Psychology, Brigham Young
University) is Associate Professor of Psychology and Pastoral Counseling
and Founding Director of the Center for Trauma Studies and Resilience
Leadership at Loyola University Maryland. Dr. O'Grady's
interests include disasters, sensemaking, and resilience.
James Douglas "Doug" Orton (Ph.D., University of
Michigan) is a Professor at the Center for Trauma Studies and Resilience
Leadership. His work focuses on reducing human suffering through studies
of cosmology episodes and the dissemination of best practices in
resilience management.
Carol K. Stewart (Masters in Social Work, Doctoral Candidate in
Pastoral Counseling and Counselor Education, Loyola University of
Maryland) is the Chaplaincy Fellow at Uniformed Service University of
the Health Sciences, Suicide Care, Prevention, and Research (CPR)
Initiative. Her interests include moral injury, trauma, resilience and
meaning making.
William W. Flythe III (M.S. in clinical mental health counseling).
He is a doctoral candidate at Loyola University Maryland, and he
practices as a licensed clinical professional counselor. His research
focuses on the spiritual and religious aspects of personality.
Nicole C. Snyder (M.S. in Pastoral Counseling, Loyola University)
is a Ph.D. student at Old Dominion University on a graduate
assistantship. Ms. Snyder was the graduate assistant to Dr. O'Grady
during the foundation process of the Center for Trauma Studies and
Resilience Leadership at Loyola University Maryland. Ms. Snyder's
interests include self-efficacy, community formation, resilience, and
agency.
Jean-Philippe Desius (Student in Translation-Centre d'Etudes
Diplomatiques et Internationales, Port-au-Prince, Haiti; Student in
IT-Network Administration, Western Governors University, Utah) served as
a translator and interpreter following the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Mr.
Desius is currently working as a Solutions Analyst at Intermountain
Healthcare.
Appendix A
Time 2 Semistructured Interview Protocol
1. What has your experience been like since the earthquake until
now?
2. What continues to be difficult for you?
3. Does anything help sustain you through the difficult times?
Please explain.
4. How are you different from before the earthquake to now? What
differences do you see in yourself?
5. Did you have any experiences with God during or following the
earthquake?
6. Has your relationship with God changed from before the
earthquake until after the earthquake?
7. How has Haiti changed since the earthquake?
8. What advice would you give other people who have gone through a
natural disaster?
9. Is there anything else that you would like to share with us
about your experience?
Table 1
Emergent Themes and Supporting Quotes for Resilient Sensemaking
Processes
Categories and themes Illustrative quotes
Courage "When I feel discouraged, I always ask
myself if I have something to do. [If
so, I just] need to do it, because God
trusted me [to do it]. He [entrusted]
me as a leader in the church. And that
is why I [just] need to keep going."
Acceptance "If you have an earthquake, you [just]
accept it, and you need to overcome."
Spiritual endurance "After the 10th of January [2010],
there were many things that weren't
there anymore. And the lesson that
we've [all] learned was [that] if
something is going to happen, we have
to fight together.... We learned that
we needed to work together as a
community to make things happen. And
in my experience ... when you do work
for the community, God will bless
those efforts."
Social support "My family and friends helped me quite
a bit."
Resilient improvising
Creative imagination "[After the earthquake, I met a boy
who had lost his arm in the
earthquake]. It was an extraordinary
experience. My experience with him
marked me and had a big impact on me.
When somebody was discouraged, I would
say: 'Well, look at Gason [pseudonym]!
Before [the earthquake], he wrote with
his right hand, but now he writes with
his left hand.' You help them see that
there is another way of doing things."
Spiritual identity "I know that I am a son of God. But
after the earthquake, I'd ask myself:
'Why did God protect me?'.... I
[would answer] 'Because He needs me.
He has a special plan for me.' Since
[then], I do my best to become closer
to God, and I've become closer to
Him."
Divine intervention "The biggest marvel that I experienced
was that I was able to do the things I
was able to do, even though I was
wounded and traumatized. So I still
look back on that time and see it as a
true miracle."
Collaborative coping "As religious people ... our most
(with God and others) effective actions are when God is
working through us. So we need to
nourish our faith and be able nourish
the faith of other people, so that God
can act through us."
Resilient sense-remaking
Positive reappraisal "Before January 10th, I prayed to God.
And after January 10th, I was more
aware that God was present. [After the
earthquake] the decisions we made at
the school were helped by God. God was
[helping us] in those decisions."
Sense of purpose "I didn't do it so people would see me
and [praise me]; I just did [things
for others] as a real brother in
Jesus."
Spiritual devotion "So I always pray before leaving my
house."
Community outreach "People from outside came in to work
with people in the hospital, and they
came in and ... asked me to help. I
began working with children who were
handicapped."
Resilient renewing
New identity "I just got a dream ... to become a
psychologist or a social worker. And
now I am [achieving] my dream."
Increased courage "Before the earthquake, I didn't have
the courage to help people. But now I
have the courage to help people who
are helpless."
Increased altruism "I opened a school ... And I began to
work with hospitals and [provide
counseling to] children who [sur-
vived] the earthquake."
Increased sense of community "Before, it was difficult to
communicate with someone [but] now it
is really easy to communicate, because
[everyone] works together.... Now all
[Haitians] are confident that they are
brothers and sisters, and now they
work together."
Increased strength "[Now] I [am] able to work long hours,
[until] seven or eight o'clock."
Increased knowledge "There were a lot of changes in Haiti
[after] the earth-quake. The first one
is that people now know exactly what
to do if a disaster like that happens
[again]."
Increased faith "Before, I was thinking that God does
not love me as [much as] He loves
everyone [else]. But now, after the
earthquake, my faith is much stronger.
I realize that God loves me, and I am
supposed to be who God wants me to
be."
Table 2
Emergent Themes and Supporting Quotes for Rigid Sensemaking
Processes
Categories and themes Illustrative quotes
Rigid sense-losing
Fear "We live in Haiti, and Haiti is a
country where can hap-pen.... We are
just afraid about something like that
happening [again]. What are we to do?"
Negative appraisal "God must not love me or Haiti, for
this to happen to us."
Disengagement "I couldn't stay here in Port-au-
Prince. I had to liberate myself from
the ghosts of the earthquake."
Denial and disassociation "I [just] feel that I'm not emotive.
The after-shocks did not frighten me,
but they frightened others."
Rigid improvising
Deferring coping "As we know, when someone knows God,
(with God and others) even though things are hard, you should
always act like things are okay for you
... I tell [people of] faith: 'Prayer
fixes every-thing.'"
Self-directing coping "People should be educated as to what
happens in a natural disaster. God
will not protect them ... They need to
know where to go and what to do."
Maladaptive conservation of "Before I didn't have anything to do,
beliefs and now I have nothing to do. I know
that the Lord doesn't always right
away. Like if I pray, I might not get
my blessing today, but I hope to get my
blessing one day. Even though I am
getting old, I am still thinking that
God can help me in the future--before I
die."
Stagnated imagination "I am just going to wait here in my
tent until I die, and then I can be
with my family again in heaven."
Rigid sense-remaking?
Sense of abandonment "I can tell you it has been a long time
since the women of the church come into
my home."
Isolation "I lost all my family. I am living by
myself now, and you know, it's not good
for me."
Hopelessness "It became clear that this government
does not have a clear strategy for
integrating young people into the [gov-
ernmental] administration or into the
country [at large]."
Rigid renewing
Decreased self-efficacy "Life used to be better for me before
the earthquake. But now things are [a
lot] harder for me."
Decreased faith "Just after the earthquake, people felt
closer to God. [But now people have]
just up and wanted to enjoy their
flesh."
Decreased resources "It is not good, because I have two
daughters and a son, even though I live
in a small little room like this. It's
hard for them to play and stuff. Also,
I am not working."
General resignation "My mind is changed, because I don't
think I will really get back to [my old
self] because everything is just so
hard."
COPYRIGHT 2018 CAPS International (Christian Association for Psychological Studies)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.