An update to the recommended core content for sun safety messages for public education in Canada: a consensus report.
Marrett, Loraine D. ; Chu, Maria B.H. ; Atkinson, John 等
An update to the recommended core content for sun safety messages for public education in Canada: a consensus report.
Exposure to the sun and other sources of ultraviolet radiation
(UVR) without sufficient protection is a well-established cause of skin
cancer. (1) UVR is also known to cause harm to the eyes. (2) National
surveys found that in 2006, Canadians spent more time in the sun without
improving their sun protection behaviours than in 1996. (3) If current
trends continue, there is expected to be a 72% increase in the number of
new melanoma cases diagnosed in Canada during the five-year period of
2028-2032, compared to 2003-2007. (4)
Stakeholder consensus on sun safety information for public
education across Canada was undertaken to increase message consistency.
National consensus was last achieved in 1994 (5) and messages have been
updated inconsistently since then. Research suggests that adoption of
cancer prevention behaviours among individuals decreases when they are
presented with ambiguous information. (6) The result of the consensus
process is a core set of recommended content describing protective
measures for individuals based on the latest scientific information and
balanced by considerations such as physical activity recommendations and
the requirements of outdoor work.
The updated content is not expected to improve protection among
individuals on its own. The content fulfills a standard step in planning
for health communications campaigns by establishing agreement on what
should be communicated. Organizations are expected to determine how this
information should be communicated, and then tailor the wording of the
content, the order in which the content appears and the amount of detail
provided according to the needs of different audiences. Developing
tailored messages should be based on focus testing among target
audiences and identifying communications strategies that research
suggests can achieve behaviour change. In addition, some audiences may
require information beyond the recommended core content. Integrating
further evidence-based information for reducing UVR exposure as needed
is encouraged. Similarly, reducing UVR exposure among the public will
also require structural changes, such as policies to increase shade.
Consensus on personal protection recommendations could support policy
development.
The Ontario Sun Safety Working Group (OSSWG) initiated the current
work in consultation with a scientific panel (see Supplementary
Appendix, in the ARTICLE TOOLS section on the journal site) comprised of
nine scientists, in the fields of UVR physics, optometry, dermatology,
epidemiology, architectural science with a focus on shade, and
endocrinology with a focus on vitamin D; and one health promotion
specialist. The panel summarized their knowledge of the best available
evidence in their fields. Major evidence reviews were identified where
applicable, such as the International Agency for Research on
Cancer's review establishing UVR as a cause of skin cancer. (1)
Evidence in the field of UVR is otherwise primarily found in studies
describing the UVR-protective properties of shade, clothing, eyewear and
sunscreen, measured in controlled conditions, and through the
measurements of UVR in Canada throughout the day and year and under
different conditions, such as cloud, by Environment Canada. Further
detail on the evidence is noted in Appendix A. Based on their summary,
the panel also drafted a set of content, which served as a starting
point for broader discussions, including a review by external experts
(see Acknowledgements section) and focus testing among public health
stakeholders in Ontario.
The consensus process
In 2014-2015, OSSWG members with Cancer Care Ontario, the Canadian
Cancer Society and the Canadian Dermatology Association convened an
interdisciplinary national steering committee (see Supplementary
Appendix) including scientists and health promotion specialists, and
initiated a national consensus process. The objective of the consensus
process was to balance the need to reduce UVR exposure as much as
possible with the recognition that eliminating all UVR exposure is not
practical.
As a first step in the process, the National Steering Committee
took the information gathered and revised the wording of the scientific
panel's set of content by integrating feedback from the external
reviewers and the focus testing process with a view to increasing
usability for public education. Revisions were for the purposes of
increasing clarity, conciseness and--to support the feasibility of the
project--limiting the focus of the content to protective actions for
individuals among the general population. Interpretation of the science
was not revised; revisions focused on the level of detail to include,
with consideration given to the strength of the evidence supporting
further detail. Accuracy was maintained through the advice of the
scientists on the committee. Information that was not relevant to
individual protection, such as developing shade policies, was not
considered part of the project's scope. The committee also agreed
that addressing the protective requirements of vulnerable populations,
such as those with very fair skin and infants, would require further
expert review of the evidence. This approach to revisions with
scientific oversight was maintained throughout the consensus process.
Following the revisions, the steering committee then:
* engaged a health communications expert;
* identified stakeholders;
* established a framework and criteria for achieving consensus;
* conducted an in-person workshop on March 12, 2015;and
* conducted pre- and post-workshop surveys with stakeholders
regarding message content.
A total of 28 organizations (Table 1) across Canada with a role in
promoting sun safety participated in the consensus process. Participants
included: national dermatology, eye health, public health, family
medicine and pediatric organizations; Environment Canada; the Public
Health Agency of Canada; provincial cancer agencies and Canadian Cancer
Society national and provincial divisions.
Most disagreements identified in the pre-workshop survey related to
the details included in four topics: time in the sun, sunscreen, vitamin
D and eye protection. At the in-person workshop, scientific experts
presented on these four topics. After each presentation, attendees
discussed content for that topic in small-group and plenary sessions.
Final wording was agreed in plenary sessions. Attendees indicated
residual disagreements through a voting process. In the follow-up survey
to confirm the wording from the workshop, there was a high degree of
acceptance and support. Only three statements in the content set were
indicated as not accepted, and no more than two consensus participants
indicated this position for any one statement. The National Steering
Committee reviewed the comments describing the reason for disagreements
and changes were integrated into the final set of content with
confirmation from the consensus participants.
As a final step, the steering committee elected to undertake
further review of the primary statement on eye protection through one
additional survey among consensus participants. The survey was not able
to identify a resolution on details describing when to wear eye
protection. This was primarily due to imprecision in the science and
difficulty in making practical recommendations. As a result, the
steering committee moved these details to secondary levels of content,
which were not the primary focus for achieving consensus.
The Recommended Core Content for Sun Safety Messages in Canada
The result of the consensus process is the new Recommended Core
Content for Sun Safety Messages in Canada (Table 2), which comprises
four groups of statements:
1. Key Facts: These statements highlight the potential harms of
UVR. Additional facts may be added to public communications, but the key
facts are core statements for describing why skin and eye protection are
needed.
2. Primary Recommended Protective Action Statements: These
statements provide information on the specific actions that individuals
should take to reduce harmful UVR exposure. They make recommendations
for situations where protection is required.
3. Additional Recommended Protective Action Statements: These
statements provide additional actions for individuals to consider when
planning daily activities, prior to UVR exposure. They would be most
relevant to an audience receptive to recommendations for advanced
planning.
4. Tips for Implementing the Primary Protective Actions: These
statements provide further details on how to implement personal
protective actions, as outlined in the primary protective action
statements. The tips are a secondary level of information to include in
materials where space permits.
Organizations are encouraged to adopt, at minimum, the Primary
Recommended Protective Action Statements (group 2) where practical. By
doing so, sun safety information will be communicated more consistently,
thereby improving knowledge and reducing inaction that may result from
message ambiguity. (6)
Table 3 compares the 1994 Strategies to Reduce Ultraviolet
Radiation (UVR) Exposure and Related Health Risks, which served as the
action statements for the public, to the new action statements. In
addition to a shortened list, which focuses on the immediate protective
actions that are recommended with UVR exposure, there are several
detailed changes in the new set, and greater prominence is given to eye
protection.
IMPLICATIONS AND NEXT STEPS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION
The consensus process was well received and a high degree of
agreement on the resulting content was achieved. The process benefitted
from interdisciplinary discussions and a phased approach to developing
the content.
A longer report, to be posted on the OSSWG website, will provide a
summary of the evidence, describe the consensus process in detail and
additional considerations for UVR protection.
The recommended core content helps organizations with a role in
promoting sun safety in Canada to form a common understanding of what is
needed for effective sun protection. A key next step is adapting the
agreed-upon content to tailor messages for target audiences, including
priority subpopulations, and community-wide campaigns. Most workshop
attendees expressed interest in continuing to be involved in the
development of public education messages.
APPENDIX A. EVIDENCE AND RATIONALE SUPPORTING THE STATEMENTS
ACCEPTED THROUGH THE CONSENSUS PROCESS AND INCLUDED IN THE FINAL SET OF
CONTENT_
Where applicable, major reviews were identified and included to
develop the Recommended Core Content for Sun Safety Messages in Canada
and are noted below. Research in the area of the properties of
ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and protective measures is not extensive and
therefore limited to individual studies. The scientific panel evaluated
these studies and relevant review articles to come to an agreement
regarding what is reasonable to recommend in the context of the level of
evidence available. The underlying premise of the recommended core
content is that whatever individuals can realistically do to reduce UVR
exposure will be to their benefit. This is based on the research that
UVR is a cause of skin cancer and eye damage. The more limited evidence
in other areas, such as how some protective measures have been observed
to be more reliable than others (e.g., shade and clothing are more
reliable than sunscreen), was evaluated as to whether they are
nonetheless reasonable to integrate into the recommended core content.
1. Key Facts
High-level information statements based on an
International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC) review linking UVR to skin cancer, and
measurement studies observing UVR effects on
the eye and UVR strength throughout the day
and year and under cloudy conditions as cited
in Table 2. Recommended Core Content for Sun
Safety Messages in Canada.
2. Primary Recommended Protective Action Statements
Enjoy the sun safely. This statement is based on feedback from the
health promotion field and recommendations
from the National Institute for Health and
Care Excellence (NICE) UK (15) and the
International Commission on Non-Ionizing
Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) UVI Working
Group (16) to acknowledge the sense of well-
being individuals experience when outdoors and
to ensure that sun protection messages do not
conflict with physical activity messages.
Evidence also suggests that increased outdoor
time, among children and youth in particular,
is associated with increased physical
activity. (17,18)
Protect your skin. Skin protection is needed to reduce
ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure from the
sun and UVR- emitting tanning devices because
UVR exposure has been classified as
carcinogenic to humans by the IARC:
* Solar UVR causes melanoma, and basal and
squamous cell carcinoma. (19)
* UVR-emitting tanning devices cause melanoma.
(19)
Protect your eyes. There is sufficient evidence that UVR-emitting
tanning devices are a cause of some forms of
ocular melanoma, although the evidence is
limited for solar UVR. (19)
Some evidence suggests chronic exposure to
UVR, in general, is a risk factor for several
other eye- related disorders, including
cortical cataracts and pterygium. (20,21)
Acute exposure to UVR can also cause
photokeratitis, photoconjunctivitis, and
retinal burns (e.g., from looking directly at
the sun). (22) Age-related macular
degeneration is likely related to exposure to
the visible light portion of sunlight,
specifically the blue light range. (2)
When the UV Index is The UV Index is based on the erythemal
3 or higher, protect (sunburn) action spectrum and primarily
your skin as much as includes the UVB spectrum and a portion of the
possible. UVA spectrum. The minimal erythema dose (MED)
is the measure of the minimum dose of UVR to
produce a just-noticeable erythema on
previously unexposed skin. The MED varies by
skin type, sensitivity to UVR and time. When
the UV Index is 3, the first sign of erythema,
or 1 MED, occurs after 44.4 minutes for skin
type I, the most sensitive skin type (e.g.,
fair skin and burns easily) and about 56
minutes of exposure for skin type II. (9,23) A
UV Index of 3 is used as a threshold for
increased risk of skin damage during common
outdoor activities for the broadest segment of
the population. The ICNIRP UVI Working Group
has recommended using a single sun protection
message to coincide with times when the UV
Index is 3 and above, and to indicate times of
day when sun protection is recommended. (16)
In general, the UV The strength of the rays of the sun that cause
Index in Canada can sunburn, which is what the UV Index measures,
be 3 or higher from is greatest around solar noon on a clear day
11 a.m. to 3 p.m. in the summer. The UV Index can remain strong
between April and at 3 or higher, from about 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
September, even when local solar time (approximately 11 a.m. to 3
it's cloudy. p.m. during daylight savings time) from April
to September in Canada. While the UV Index
declines with increasing latitude, the
differences between Toronto (44[degrees]N) and
Edmonton (54[degrees]N) are not very large.
(8)
Previously, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. was established
to account for variations in solar noon time
across the country. Based on the more recent
studies cited from Environment Canada
scientists, this variation was determined to
not be substantial and consensus participants
agreed that a narrower time frame would likely
increase its acceptability with the public.
The statement on cloudy conditions is included
because partly cloudy skies will either
magnify or mitigate UVR, depending on the
pattern of cloud cover and the sun's relative
position, (24) while uniform cloud cover
reduces UVR in relation to its thickness. (25)
Seek shade or bring Evidence suggests reported use of shade and
your own (e.g., an protective clothing is more strongly related
umbrella). Wear to reduced risk of sunburn than sunscreen use.
clothing and a wide- (26-28) Research has measured substantially
brimmed hat that higher levels of protection with clothing
cover as much skin as compared to sunscreen. (12,13) Shade and
possible, as clothing can provide broader and more visible
appropriate to the coverage than sunscreen and therefore appear
activity and weather. before the statement on sunscreen.
Use sunscreen The effectiveness of sunscreens labelled
labelled "broad "broad spectrum" (filtering UVA and UVB) is
spectrum" and "water- determined by laboratory tests. (29)
resistant" with a sun Water-resistant sunscreen is recommended to
protection factor reduce the amount removed through perspiration
(SPF) of at least 30 and swimming. Sunscreens labelled "water
on skin not covered resistant" in Canada must continue to provide
by clothing. Apply protection for at least 40 minutes in water.
sunscreen generously (29)
and reapply when
required. SPF 15 is the minimum accepted protection
level for sunscreens in Canada, based on
Health Canada regulations. Laboratory tests
also show that sunscreen with an SPF of 15
filters 93.33% of UVB, while an SPF of 30
filters 96.67%.30 SPF testing to determine the
labelled value is based on an application of 2
mg/[cm.sup.2]. However, tests of volunteers
reporting sunscreen use in community settings
show that application densities typically
range from 0.5 mg/[cm.sup.2] to 1.3 mg/
[cm.sup.2]--substantially less than the
recommended amount. A minimum SPF of 30 is
therefore recommended for use by the public to
offset the typically lower volume of
application. (31)
Reapplication after two hours is not included
as a recommendation because research has
measured only a 25% reduction in SPF after a
day without physical activity or UVR
exposure,32 and even after eight hours on a
day with physical activity and bathing, 43% of
the initial protective effect of sunscreen was
still present. (33)
Nonetheless, evidence for improved outcomes
with sunscreen use is not as strong as for
shade, as described above, which may be in
part due to the typically inadequate sunscreen
application patterns among the public.
Therefore, shade and clothing appear before
sunscreen in the action statements because
they are considered better UVR-protection
options.
Don't use UV tanning UVR from the sun and UVR-emitting tanning
equipment or devices has been classified by IARC as
deliberately try to carcinogenic to humans. UVR-emitting tanning
get a suntan, and devices cause melanoma. (19)
avoid getting a
sunburn. Reported history of sunburns and tan-seeking
behaviour may be associated with an increased
risk of melanoma. (34,35)
Wear sunglasses or The UV Index is a measure of the shorter
prescription wavelengths of the UVR spectrum that cause
eyeglasses with UV- sunburns, primarily within the UVB spectrum.
protective lenses. Since the longer wavelengths of UVR, primarily
within the UVA spectrum, are more directly
associated with eye health and can be strong
throughout the day, eye protection
recommendations apply on days even when the UV
Index is low, and are therefore separate from
the skin protection recommendations and do not
include specific times for when eye protection
is needed. The cornea fully absorbs UVB, but
UVA penetrates surface layers and reaches the
lens of the eye. (36)
Modern sunglass and eyeglass lens materials
that are commonly available, including
polyurethanes (mid- to high-index plastics),
polycarbonate and CR39 with UV blocking dye
(UV400), provide UVR protection. (37)
Wear a wide-brimmed Wide-brimmed hats provide additional eye
hat for added eye protection when worn in conjunction with
protection. eyewear, especially when eyewear does not
cover the peripheral areas of the eyes.
3. Additional Recommended Protective Action Statements
Check the daily The UV Index provides more detailed guidance
forecast for the UV on the level of protection required on a given
Index and protect day. The UV Index can reach up to 10 in Canada
your skin and higher in other parts of the world. The
accordingly. higher the UV Index value, the more protection
is needed.
However, information on the UV Index is not
always accessible throughout the day and
real-time values may differ from forecasted
values. Therefore, this recommendation is
listed as an additional recommended protective
action statement, rather than as a primary
action statement.
Between April and An additional measure to reduce UVR exposure
September, whenever is to limit time outdoors. At all stages of
possible, plan the consensus process, consensus participants
outdoor activities were in agreement that prioritizing this
for before 11 a.m. or statement would result in losing the attention
after 3 p.m. of most audiences. Therefore, this statement
appears as an additional recommended
protective action statement and for when
planning outdoor activities would be feasible.
Use sources of Although UVB exposure can increase vitamin D
vitamin D that are levels, the science has not established a safe
safer than UVR level of exposure in terms of health risk.
exposure, e.g., This recommendation to not use UVR exposure
dietary sources, for obtaining vitamin D is consistent with
including fortified Health Canada's recommendation, which is based
foods, and vitamin D on an extensive review by the Institute of
supplements. Medicine. (38)
Intentional UVR
exposure to meet
vitamin D
requirements is not
recommended.
4. Tips for Implementing the Primary Protective Actions
These tips are based on expert knowledge on
the evidence for the UVR-protective properties
of shade, clothing, sunscreen and the field of
eye health and eye protection. Citations where
applicable are included in the main table.
REFERENCES
(1.) IARC Working Group on Risk of Skin Cancer and Exposure to
Artificial Ultraviolet Light, International Agency for Research on
Cancer (Eds.). Exposure to Artificial UV Radiation and Skin Cancer.
Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International Agency for
Research on Cancer, 2006.
(2.) Yam JCS, Kwok AKH. Ultraviolet light and ocular diseases. Int
Ophthalmol 2014;34(2):383-400. PMID: 23722672. doi:
10.1007/s10792-013-9791-x.
(3.) National Skin Cancer Prevention Committee. Exposure to and
Protection from the Sun in Canada: A Report Based on the 2006 Second
National Sun Survey. Toronto, ON: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer,
2010.
(4.) Canadian Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Cancer
Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2015. Special Topic: Predictions
of the Future Burden of Cancer in Canada. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer
Society, 2015.
(5.) Mills CJ, Jackson S. Workshop report: Public education
messages for reducing health risks from ultraviolet radiation. Chronic
Dis Can 1995; 16(1):33-36. Available at:
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/
20071223122331/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cdic-mcc/16-1/d_e.
html (Accessed June 1, 2015).
(6.) Han PKJ, Moser RP, Klein WMP. Perceived ambiguity about cancer
prevention recommendations: Associations with cancer-related perceptions
and behaviours in a US population survey. Health Expect
2007;10(4):321-36. PMID: 17986069. doi:
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00456.x.
(7.) Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin
cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001;63(1-3):8-18. PMID: 11684447. doi:
10.1016/ S1011-1344(01)00198-1.
(8.) Fioletov VE, Kerr JB, McArthur LJB, Wardle DI, Mathews TW.
Estimating UV Index climatology over Canada. J Appl Meteorol
2003;42(3):417-33. doi: 10.
1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0417:EUICOC>2.0.CO;2.
(9.) Fioletov V, Kerr JB, Fergusson A. The UV Index: Definition,
distribution and factors affecting it. Can J Public Health
2010;101(4):I5-I9. PMID: 21033538.
(10.) Sasaki H, Sakamoto Y, Schnider C, Fujita N, Hatsusaka N,
Sliney DH, et al. UV-B exposure to the eye depending on solar altitude.
Eye Contact Lens 2011; 37(4):191-95. PMID: 21670696. doi:
10.1097/ICL.0b013e31821fbf29.
(11.) Kapelos G, Patterson M. Health, planning, design and shade: A
critical review. J Archit Plan Res 2014;31(2):91-111.
(12.) Aguilera J, de Galvez MV, Sanchez-Roldan C, Herrera-Ceballos
E. New advances in protection against solar ultraviolet radiation in
textiles for summer clothing. Photochem Photobiol 2014;90(5):1199-206.
PMID: 24861801. doi: 10.1111/php.12292.
(13.) Ghazi S, Couteau C, Coiffard LJM. What level of protection
can be obtained using sun protective clothing? Determining effectiveness
using an in vitro method. Int JPharm 2010;397(1-2):144-46. PMID:
20600730. doi: 10.1016/j. ijpharm.2010.06.022.
(14.) Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection.
Lancet 2007; 370(9586):528-37. PMID: 17693182. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60638-2.
(15.) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
Skin Cancer Prevention: Information, Resources and Environmental
Changes. NICE Public Health Guidance 32, 2011. Available at:
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph32/chapter/1Recommendations#recommendation-3- information-provision-message-content (Accessed June 1, 2015).
(16.) Allinson S, Asmuss M, Baldermann C, Bentzen J, Buller D,
Gerber N, et al. Validity and use of the UV index: Report from the UVI
working group, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany, 5-7 December 2011. Health
Phys 2012;103(3):3016. PMID: 22850235. doi: 10.1097/HP0b013e31825b581e.
(17.) Schaefer L, Plotnikoff RC, Majumdar SR, Mollard R, Woo M,
Sadman R, et al. Outdoor time is associated with physical activity,
sedentary time, and cardiorespiratory fitness in youth. J Pediatr
2014;165(3):516-21. PMID: 25043155. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.05.029.
(18.) Pearce M, Page AS, Griffin TP, Cooper AR. Who children spend
time with after school: Associations with objectively recorded indoor
and outdoor physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11(1):45.
PMID: 24679149. doi: 10. 1186/1479-5868-11-45.
(19.) International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs
on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 100D. A Review
of Human Carcinogens. Part D: Radiation. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2012.
(20.) Sliney DH. Photoprotection of the eye--UV radiation and
sunglasses. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001;64(2-3):166-75. PMID: 11744403.
doi: 10.1016/ S1011-1344(01)00229-9.
(21.) Lucas RM. An epidemiological perspective of ultraviolet
exposure--Public health concerns. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37(4):168-75.
PMID: 21670693. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31821cb0cf.
(22.) Cullen AP. Ozone depletion and solar ultraviolet radiation:
Ocular effects, a United Nations Environment Programme perspective. Eye
Contact Lens 2011; 37(4):185-90. PMID: 21670695. doi:
10.1097/ICL.0b013e318223392e.
(23.) Fioletov VE, McArthur LJB, Mathews TW, Marrett L. On the
relationship between erythemal and vitamin D action spectrum weighted
ultraviolet radiation. J Photochem Photobiol B 2009;95(1):9-16. PMID:
19150601. doi: 10. 1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.11.014.
(24.) Bodeker GE, McKenzie RL. An algorithm for inferring surface
UV irradiance including cloud effects. J Appl Meteorol
1996;35(10):1860-77. doi: 10.1175/ 1520-0450(1996)035
<1860:AAFISU>2.0.CO;2.
(25.) Tarasick DW, Fioletov VE, Wardle DI, Kerr JB, McArthur LJB,
McLinden CA. Climatology and trends of surface UV radiation: Survey
article. Atmos-Ocean 2003;41(2):121-38. doi: 10.3137/ao.410202.
(26.) Linos E, Keiser E, Fu T, Colditz G, Chen S, Tang JY. Hat,
shade, long sleeves, or sunscreen? Rethinking US sun protection messages
based on their relative effectiveness. Cancer Causes Control
2011;22(7):1067-71. PMID: 21637987. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9780-1.
(27.) K0ster B, Thorgaard C, Philip A, Clemmensen IH. Prevalence of
sunburn and sun-related behaviour in the Danish population: A
cross-sectional study. Scand J Public Health 2010;38(5):548-52. PMID:
20484310. doi: 10.1177/ 1403494810371250.
(28.) Branstrom R, Kasparian NA, Chang Y, Affleck P, Tibben A,
Aspinwall LG, et al. Predictors of sun protection behaviors and severe
sunburn in an international online study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 2010;19(9):2199-210. PMID: 20643826. doi:
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0196.
(29.) Health Canada. Sunscreen Monograph--Version 2.0, 2013.
Available at: http://
webprod.hc-sc.gc.ca/nhpid-bdipsn/atReq.do?atid=sunscreen-ecransolaire&lang= eng (Accessed May 29, 2015).
(30.) Moloney FJ, Collins S, Murphy GM. Sunscreens: Safety,
efficacy and appropriate use. Am J Clin Dermatol 2002;3(3):185-91. PMID:
11978139. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200203030-00005.
(31.) Diffey B. Sunscreens: Expectation and realization.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2009;25(5):233-36. PMID: 19747240.
doi: 10.1111/ j.1600-0781.2009.00459.x.
(32.) Beyer DM, Faurschou A, Philipsen PA, Haedersdal M, Wulf HC.
Sun protection factor persistence on human skin during a day without
physical activity or ultraviolet exposure. Photodermatol Photoimmunol
Photomed 2010; 26(1):22-27. PMID: 20070835. doi:
10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00479.x.
(33.) Bodekaer M, Faurschou A, Philipsen PA, Wulf HC. Sun
protection factor persistence during a day with physical activity and
bathing. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2008;24(6):296-300. PMID:
19000186. doi: 10.1111/ j.1600-0781.2008.00379.x.
(34.) Usher-Smith JA, Emery J, Kassianos AP, Walter FM. Risk
prediction models for melanoma: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23(8):1450-63. PMID: 24895414. doi:
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0295.
(35.) Gandini S, Autier P, Boniol M. Reviews on sun exposure and
artificial light and melanoma. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2011;107(3):362-66.
PMID: 21958910. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.09.011.
(36.) World Health Organization. The Known Health Effects of UV.
Available at: http://www.who.int/uv/faq/uvhealtfac/en/ (Accessed May 29,
2015).
(37.) Fannin TE, Grosvenor T. Clinical Optics. Boston, MA:
Butterworths, 1987.
(38.) Health Canada. Vitamin D and Calcium: Updated Dietary
Reference Intakes, 2013. Available at:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/vitamin/vita-deng.php (Accessed
July 23, 2014).
Received: March 7, 2016
Accepted: June 5, 2016
Loraine D. Marrett, PhD, [1,2] Maria B.H. Chu, MA, MISt, [1] John
Atkinson, MSW, [3] Robert Nuttall, PhD, [4] Gillian Bromfield, MSc, [5]
Larry Hershfield, MA, [2,6] Cheryl F. Rosen, MD, FRCPC, [7,8] for
Representatives in the National Consensus Process on the Recommended
Core Content for Sun Safety Messages in Canada
Author Affiliations
[1.] Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
[2.] Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON
[3.] Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Division, Toronto, ON
[4.] Canadian Cancer Society, National Office, Toronto, ON
[5.] Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, formerly with Canadian
Cancer Society, National Office, Toronto, ON
[6.] Larry Hershfield & Associates, Ltd., Toronto, ON
[7.] Division of Dermatology, Toronto Western Hospital, University
Health Network Hospitals, and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON
[8.] Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Correspondence: Maria Chu, Cancer Care Ontario, 505 University Avenue,
14th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Tel: 416-971-9800, E-mail: maria.chu@
cancercare.on.ca
Acknowledgements: The National Steering Committee for Consensus on
Content for Sun Safety Messages acknowledges funding support from the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN 137214), Cancer Care
Ontario, Canadian Cancer Society (National and Ontario Divisions),
Canadian Dermatology Association, and Saskatchewan Cancer Agency/Sun
Smart Saskatchewan. The authors thank the Ontario Sun Safety Working
Group for its advice through the entire process; the Ontario public
health sun safety leads, who focus tested an earlier version of the
message content with their stakeholders; staff at Cancer Care Ontario,
Prevention and Cancer Control and Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario
Division who provided extensive support; Jennifer McWhirter for
reviewing the manuscript for submission; and for their review of an
earlier version of the message content: Marianne Berwick, David
Broadhurst, David Buller, B. Ralph Chou, Richard Gallagher, DeAnn
Lazovich, Robyn Lucas and Craig Sinclair.
Additional acknowledgements of consensus process participants,
committee members, and scientific panel members may be found in the
Supplementary Appendix (see ARTICLE TOOLS section on the journal site).
Conflict of Interest: The Canadian Cancer Society receives an
annual financial contribution from Johnson and Johnson. Cheryl Rosen has
received honoraria from Neutrogena and La Roche Posay in the past. The
other co-authors have no conflicts to declare.
Table 1. Participant organizations in the 2014-2015 National
Consensus Process on Content for Sun Safety
Messages in Canada
* Alberta Health Services
* British Columbia Cancer Agency
* British Columbia Cancer Research Centre
* Canadian Association of Optometrists
* Canadian Cancer Society, British Columbia
* Canadian Cancer Society, National Office
* Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Division
* Canadian Cancer Society, Quebec
* Canadian Cancer Society, Saskatchewan
* Canadian Dermatology Association
* Canadian Ophthalmological Society
* Canadian Paediatric Society
* Canadian Partnership Against Cancer
* Canadian Public Health Association
* Cancer Care Nova Scotia
* Cancer Care Ontario
* CancerCare Manitoba
* CNIB [Canadian National Institute for the Blind]
* College of Family Physicians of Canada
* Environment Canada
* New Brunswick Department of Health, Office of the Chief Medical
Officer of Health
* Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Health and Community
Services, Healthy Living Division
* Ontario Sun Safety Working Group
* Public Health Agency of Canada
* Saskatchewan Cancer Agency with Sun Smart Saskatchewan
* SunSafe Nova Scotia
* Toronto Cancer Prevention Coalition
* University of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science
Table 2. Recommended Core Content for Sun Safety Messages in Canada
1. Key Facts
* Sources of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) are the sun and
UVR-emitting devices, e.g., tanning beds. UVR causes skin cancer
and other forms of skin damage (e.g., wrinkling and photoaging of
the skin) and causes harm to the eyes. (1,2)
* Skin cancer is the most common cancer in Canada, and incidence
rates for melanoma, the most fatal form of the disease, continue to
increase. (4) Skin cancer is also one of the most preventable
cancers. (7)
* While UVR that is harmful to the skin is primarily present in the
sun's rays from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. between April and September in
Canada, (8,9) UVR that is harmful to the eyes is present in the
sun's rays all year round and throughout the day. (10) In both
cases, UVR can be harmful, even when it's cloudy. (8-10)
2. Primary Recommended Protective Action Statements Enjoy the sun
safely: Protect your skin, protect your eyes.
Protect your skin
* When the UV Index is 3 or higher, protect your skin as much as
possible. In general, the UV Index in Canada can be 3 or higher
from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. between April and September, even when it's
cloudy.
* Seek shade or bring your own (e.g., an umbrella).
* Wear clothing and a wide-brimmed hat that cover as much skin as
possible, as appropriate to the activity and weather.
* Use sunscreen labelled "broad spectrum" and "water-resistant"
with a sun protection factor (SPF) of at least 30, on skin not
covered by clothing. Apply sunscreen generously and reapply when
required.
* Don't use UV tanning equipment or deliberately try to get a
suntan, and avoid getting a sunburn.
Protect your eyes
* Wear sunglasses or prescription eyeglasses with UV-protective
lenses.
* Wear a wide-brimmed hat for added eye protection.
3. Additional Recommended Protective Action Statements
* Check the daily forecast for the UV Index and protect your skin
accordingly.
* Between April and September, whenever possible, plan outdoor
activities for before 11 a.m. or after 3 p.m.
* Use sources of vitamin D that are safer than UVR exposure, e.g.,
dietary sources, including fortified foods, and vitamin D
supplements. Intentional UVR exposure to meet vitamin D
requirements is not recommended.
4. Tips for Implementing the Primary Protective Actions Shade
* Good-quality shade includes dense vegetation and covered
structures that offer shade from the side, and not just overhead,
to protect against scattered UVR. (11)
* As a general guide, wider and denser sources of shade provide
increased SPF. (11)
* Cloth sources of shade, such as canopies and umbrellas, should
have tightly woven fabric.
* Additional personal protection (clothes, sunglasses and
sunscreen) is recommended even when in the shade to protect against
scattered UVR, especially on high UV Index days.
Clothing
* Hats should shade the head, face, ears and back of the neck with
a wide brim.
* In general, clothing provides better protection than sunscreen.
(12,13)
* Tightly woven or UV-protective labelled clothing is recommended.
(13,14)
Sunscreen
* Sunscreen should be used on exposed skin not covered by
protective clothing. Consider using sunscreen for the lips (e.g.,
sunscreen lip balm) as well.
* Use a generous amount of sunscreen (e.g., the average adult
requires approximately two to three tablespoons of
lotion-formulated sunscreen to cover the whole body, and a teaspoon
to cover the face and neck).
* Reapply after swimming, strenuous exercise, or towelling off.
* Use sunscreen that says on the label:
* "Broad spectrum"
* "SPF 30" or higher
* "Water resistant"
* Sunscreen comes in a variety of formulations. Find one that suits
you best and apply it properly with thorough coverage. Sunscreen
formulations that you find easier to apply thoroughly will be more
effective.
Eye protection
* Because UVR that is harmful to the eyes is present in the sun's
rays all year round and throughout the day, eye protection may be
required even when skin protection is not.
* Eye protection is required around highly reflective environments,
such as snow, sand and water.
* The best UV protection for eyes is offered by close-fitting
wraparound sunglasses.
* Look for sunglasses or prescription lenses with full UVA and UVB
protection. Examples of appropriate labels are "UV400" or "100% UV
protection."
* Contact lenses, even those with UV protection, do not provide
full coverage for the eye and the skin around the eye.
Table 3. Comparison of 1994 and 2014-2015 protective action statements
1994 strategies to reduce 2014-2015 Recommended Core Content
ultraviolet radiation (UVR) for Sun Safety Messages in Canada
exposure and related health risks --primary recommended protective
action statements
It is possible to enjoy healthy Enjoy the sun safely: Protect your
outdoor activity while reducing skin, protect your eyes.
exposure to UVR.
Minimize sun exposure Protect your skin
* Plan your outdoor activity to * When the UV Index is 3 or
take place before 11:00 a.m. or higher, protect your skin as much
after 4:00 p.m., when sun rays are as possible. In general, the UV
the weakest. Consult the UV index Index in Canada can be 3 or higher
for daily forecasts of UVR from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. between
intensity. April and September, even when
it's cloudy.
* Practice sun protection
behaviours when you are outdoors
between April through September,
between 11:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
every day.
* In winter, practice sun
protection behaviours during
periods of extended exposure,
and/or when you are near
fresh/bright snow.
* When visiting warmer climates,
remember that UVR is more intense
there and sun protection is
especially important.
* There is no such thing as a * [statement on tanning moved
"healthy" tan. Tanning parlours down]
and sunlamps are not a safe way to
tan.
Seek shade
* Seek shade, especially from * Seek shade or bring your own
11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (e.g., an umbrella).
* Work towards creating shade in
the form of shelters, canopies
and trees.
Cover up
* Wear clothing to cover your arms * Wear clothing and a wide-
and legs. brimmed hat that cover as much
skin as possible, as appropriate
to the activity and weather.
* Wear a hat with a wide brim to * [eye protection given separate
shade your face and neck. section]
* Wear sunglasses that absorb UVR.
Use sunscreen
* Sunscreens should be used in * Use sunscreen labelled "broad
conjunction with shade, clothing, spectrum" and "water-resistant"
hats and sunglasses, not instead with a sun protection factor (SPF)
of them. * Sunscreens are not of at least 30, on skin not
intended to lengthen the time covered by clothing. Apply
spent in the sun, but to reduce sunscreen generously and reapply
exposure and provide some when required.
protection from sunburn when
people need to be in the sun.
* Use a sunscreen with SPF #15 or * Don't use UV tanning equipment
higher that has both UVA and UVB or deliberately try to get a
protection. suntan, and avoid getting a
sunburn.
Protect your eyes
* Wear sunglasses or prescription
eyeglasses with UV-protective
lenses.
* Wear a wide-brimmed hat for
added eye protection.
COPYRIGHT 2016 Canadian Public Health Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.