Municipal-Indigenous relations in Saskatchewan: Getting started in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.
Heritz, Joanne
Municipal-Indigenous relations in Saskatchewan: Getting started in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.
Most of Canada's Aboriginal peoples (1) reside in urban
centres. Yet they remain politically under-represented in municipal
governance structures, even where they have a significant population
base. While there is a growing body of literature dedicated to urban
Indigenous Peoples in Canada, their actual relationship with local
government remains understudied. How and where are Indigenous Peoples
having their issues and interests addressed within local governing
systems? In addition to having one of the highest rates of Indigenous
Peoples per capita, Saskatchewan has repositioned itself from rural to
mostly urban since the 1960s (Stabler and Olfert 1994). Recent
projections indicate that by 2031 Saskatchewan will have the largest
Indigenous population in Canada, comprising upwards of twenty-four
percent of the province's population (Statistics Canada 2011a).
Following this trajectory, most of this population will reside in urban
centres. Despite the significant urban Indigenous population, only a few
have been elected as city councillors in large prairie cities and until
2012, Saskatoon, the province's largest city, had not elected a
First Nation member to city council (Walker and Belanger 2013: 208).
Through a qualitative case-study of Municipal-Indigenous
relationships in Saskatchewan, this study aims to contribute to our
understanding of the political representation of Indigenous Peoples
within municipal governance structures. This study assesses the
political representation of Indigenous Peoples in municipal governance
in the three largest urban centres in Saskatchewan: Regina, Saskatoon
and Prince Albert. These cities are home to a significant number of
Indigenous Peoples, with a self-identified Indigenous population of over
nine percent of the total population in Regina and Saskatoon, and
forty-five percent in Prince Albert (see Table 1). The growing interest
in Indigenous Peoples is reflected in the increasing focus on their
urban experiences. Peters and Lafond (2013) describe how First Nations
cultures can be adapted to the challenges of living in Saskatoon.
Laliberte (2013) reveals the emergence of a pan-Metis Saskatoon
community, and Ouart (2013) discusses how The Saskatoon Indian and Metis
Friendship Centre was instrumental in the co-production of the delivery
of services for Indigenous Peoples. While the literature highlights the
emerging interest in urban Indigenous culture in Saskatchewan, it also
reveals that the actual interface between Indigenous Peoples and local
government remains understudied.
The article begins by disclosing the context of urban Indigenous
Peoples. Based on interviews and supporting documents, it analyzes
Municipal-Indigenous relations based on: governance interface between
municipal government and Indigenous Peoples; Indigenous culture as
municipal asset; economic and social development; and urban reserves,
service agreements and regional relationships (Walker 2008: 21). The
analysis reveals that the three municipalities, by varying degrees, lag
in substantive relationship building with Indigenous communities. These
preliminary findings contribute to addressing the gaps of our
understanding of Indigenous representation in municipal government, and
point to the need for more in-depth analysis of urban Indigenous
engagement.
Background
Understanding the relationship between government and urban
Indigenous Peoples involves governance, policy and community
considerations. This section lays out the constitutional
responsibilities, governance structure, public policy implications,
non-Indigenous attitudes, and challenges to self-determination faced by
urban Indigenous Peoples. It ends with a description of the framework
that guides the analysis of the research findings of
Municipal-Indigenous relations in Regina, Saskatoon, and Prince Albert.
Constitutional responsibilities
All levels of government in Canada have constitutional
responsibilities for "the existing aboriginal and treaty rights of
the aboriginal peoples of Canada" including those residing in urban
centres (RCAPv2Partl.l996: 85-86; Andersen and Denis 2003). Recent
decisions in Canadian courts have helped to clarify the relationship
between Indigenous Peoples and the state in urban centres. In Canada v
Misquadis the Federal Court ruled that Aboriginal political
organizations can represent Aboriginal interests and the decision also
defined off-reserve Aboriginal people as, "a group of
self-organized, self-determining and distinct communities analogous to a
reserve community" (Walker and Belanger 2013: 199). And the recent
Supreme Court of Canada decision (Daniels v Canada 2016) confirmed
federal responsibility for Metis and non-status Indians, most of whom
reside in urban centres. For Walker and Belanger these court decisions
establish a legal framework to "guide Aboriginal community leaders;
Canadian policymakers; and federal, provincial, and municipal officials
to better determine what an urban Aboriginal community is and what it
represents to the various agencies drawn into their orbit"
(2013:199).
Urban Indigenous governance
The more recent scholarly interest in urban Indigenous Peoples
discloses that the actual interface between municipal government and
urban Indigenous communities remains understudied (Adams and
Gosnell-Myers 2013). Commenting on contributions to his book on urban
Indigenous policy making in Alberta, Manitoba and Ontario, Young
recommends Aboriginal inclusion in policy-making processes (2011: 222).
He explains that providing special representation at the municipal level
is important because, "Aboriginal people are different from the
majority society. They have different histories, different cultures and
different political traditions; most important, they have different
rights" (2011: 214).
Multilevel governance may minimize the role of local government. On
the one hand, policy processes in local government focus on
"services to property" while "services to people"
are left to senior governments (Leo et al. 2012: 300-301). Therefore,
boundaries are placed on local government in managing differences as a
junior stakeholder, up against other more powerful levels of government
and social forces dictated by strong business interests. On the other
hand, local government is closest and most accessible to people and as
such, "promote[s] direct citizen involvement in decision
making" (Kushner and Siegel 2003: 1037). Given that the federal
government exercises treaty relations and municipalities are governed by
provincial statutes, Walker (2008) believes that municipalities are
empowered to be more responsive to Aboriginal communities. Despite
having fewer financial resources, municipalities have tighter staff
complements who are aware of what one another are doing and politicians
who maintain close personal connections within their community (Walker
2008: 28). Resolving the tensions between municipalities as service
providers on the one hand and potential fora for citizen engagement on
the other, Doberstein argues that only when urban governance networks
include communities, will societal fragmentation and resistance to
change be reduced (2013: 587). The representation of urban Indigenous
Peoples within the machinery of local government challenges the
"property" and "people" dichotomy, and stresses the
potential of local government to take responsibility for the inclusion
of Indigenous Peoples in municipal policy networks.
Urban Indigenous policy
Indigenous representation in policy processes impacts broad state
and societal principles that have a fiduciary responsibility to assist
and collaborate with Indigenous communities. Indigenous Peoples view
self-determination as a "partnership with the settler state that is
guided by mutual respect and recognition, the spirit of historic and
contemporary treaty relationships, constitutional arrangements, and
continuing group rights" (Walker and Belanger 2013: 198). Obstacles
that challenge their aspirations of self-determination range from
quality of life gap between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal citizens to
the variations of Aboriginal policy in each urban centre (Andersen
2013b: 267-268). Andersen observes that government intervention has
rarely positioned urban Aboriginality "as a distinct object of
governance," preferring instead to position it within a larger
object of governance like homelessness, job training, domestic violence,
and child welfare (Andersen 2013b: 272). The absence of a territorial
base should not deter Indigenous aspirations of self-determination.
Nationhood, for Dubois, transcends territorial boundaries and
"requires that contemporary politics distinguish self-government,
self-determination and sovereignty from the control over a territory and
acknowledge the relational character of identity, place and people"
(2011: 5).
Provincial intervention regarding Municipal-Indigenous relations
requires municipalities to measure and report annually to the
Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission (SHRC) on four equity groups in
their city workforce: Aboriginal, visible minority, people with
disabilities and women. Included in its goals for a representative
workforce, the SHRC targeted Aboriginal People in the provincial
workforce at 14 percent and at the municipal level targeted Prince
Albert and Northern Administration District at 35 percent (SHRC 2016:
38).
Community resistance to Indigenous policy
Significant impediments to the development of strong
Municipal-Indigenous relationships are the opinions of the
non-Indigenous population in Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan residents'
negative attitudes toward Indigenous policy were revealed in two
surveys: the 2011 Saskatchewan Election Study (SKES) and the 2012 Taking
the Pulse (TTP) survey. White analyzed the two surveys and rated the
Saskatchewan population as having relatively high awareness of
Indigenous Peoples because issues concerning Indigenous policy and
organizations frequently appear in the media (White et al. 2015: 282).
They found that non-Aboriginal resistance to Aboriginal policy in
Saskatchewan is governed in part by prejudice and in general by people
who are not in favour of government intervention (White et al. 2015:
299-300). The Urban Aboriginal Peoples Survey (UAPS) interviewed
non-Aboriginal urban Canadians and found that most of them are positive
or neutral about the presence of Aboriginal people in their cities.
However, the percentage of non-Aboriginal people with negative attitudes
toward Aboriginal peoples was higher in cities with larger Aboriginal
populations, especially in Regina (34 percent) and Saskatoon (19
percent) (Environics 2010: 157). This leads to opposition to some
initiatives to increase Aboriginal representation, such as the creation
of urban reserves. As Walker and Belanger (2013: 207) observe,
"[p]art of the challenge for planners involves transforming the
disposition of citizens and elected officials towards urban reserve
creation from a reactive role to a proactive land and economic
development role for the municipality."
Municipal-Indigenous relations in Saskatchewan evolve within a
context that is structured by constitutional and legal principles, but
that is also conditioned by political and social attitudes. As
municipalities seek to build relations with Indigenous Peoples and
respect their right to self-determination, they have to confront the
complex reality of socio-economic gaps between Indigenous and
non-Indigenous populations as well as resistance to policies that seek
to increase Indigenous representation. However, these emerging trends
are taking place within a province where negative attitudes prevail
toward Indigenous policies.
Analytic approach
A place-based policy approach is specifically designed to analyze
Municipal-Indigenous relationships (Bradford and Chouinard 2010;
Bradford 2005). This approach bridges the physical and power
infrastructures at a specific geographical scale with social
infrastructures and community networks characterized by the following
four elements. First, it acknowledges that local knowledge is key to
effective problem-solving. Second, it locates the desired policy mix by
balancing targeted measures for spatial locations and
"aspatial" polices for housing and education, for example.
Third, it emphasizes collaboration among government and civil society
and across and between varying levels of government. And finally, it
acknowledges local governments as crucial actors in the governance of
the place-based policy framework supported with recognition and capacity
(Bradford 2005: v). The anticipated significance of this approach is to
bring awareness to a broader policy community and enable dialogues that
can best address urban Indigenous issues.
Walker's (2008) framework, based on consultation with
Indigenous Peoples regarding their relationship with municipal
government, allows for a substantial scrutiny of their urban issues and
aspirations in the absence of a coherent set of
municipal-provincial-federal goals regarding urban Indigenous policy.
(2) The five areas of highest priority, opportunities and challenges
identified in the study provide the framework to analyze
Municipal-Indigenous relations, as follows:
1. Citizen Participation and Engagement: Municipal-Indigenous
relations could be improved by "a stronger process for ensuring
Aboriginal citizen participation from the scale of the household, to
community/ neighbourhood, to city council" (Walker 2008: 27).
2. Governance Interface: Other ways of improving the
Municipal-Aboriginal interface is through cultural, service or
educational organizations. Aboriginal communities "seek to exercise
self-determining autonomy locally in partnership with non-Aboriginal
Canadian society" (Walker 2008: 28). There are two types of working
relationships that municipalities should undertake and regularize. One
is with Aboriginal reserves or rural communities, with governments such
as band councils, with proximity to a municipality. The second type is
an Aboriginal advisory body that consists of leaders of Aboriginal
communities who are engaged in consultation and decision-making on
municipal matters as they pertain to Aboriginal peoples (Walker 2008:
29).
3. Aboriginal Culture as Municipal Asset: The opportunity for both
communities to strengthen their interface (Walker 2008, 30) includes,
for example, Aboriginal culture in urban design, community services,
street and park naming, and economic development. A single office within
municipal government committed to the culture and aspirations of
Aboriginal peoples may accommodate this work (Walker 2008: 31).
Municipal human resource strategies should include staff recruitment,
training and retention initiatives to attract and promote Aboriginal
staff (Walker 2008: 31).
4. Economic and Social Development: Partnering with Aboriginal
communities can yield gains by acknowledging Aboriginal culture and
history in municipal heritage and tourism. Private sector partners can
provide job and entrepreneurship training and business development for
Aboriginal residents (Walker 2008: 31).
5. Urban Reserves, Service Agreements and Regional Relationships:
Urban reserves and service agreements provide economic development
opportunities for both First Nations and municipalities (Walker 2008:
32). Urban reserves are arranged according to the 1992 Saskatchewan
Treaty Land Entitlement Framework Agreement (TLEFA), by the federal
government, the province of Saskatchewan, and the band establishing the
urban reserve. A federal order-in-council officially transfers the land
into an urban reserve, which is then made subject to the Indian Act
(Barron and Garcia 2005: 3). Urban reserves range in size from a city
lot to 35 acres (McKnight Commercial Centre in Saskatoon), for example
(Canada WEDC 2016: 4). There were 51 urban reserves in Saskatchewan in
2014 (Soonias et al. 2016:1).
Keeping the integrity of Walker's framework, I have
streamlined the five categories to best disclose Municipal-Indigenous
relations for the three cities. The major revision I made was to shift
Citizen Participation from a category because it so closely aligns with
the overall assessment of this study. The remaining four categories
assess Municipal-Indigenous relations as follows: Urban Reserves reports
on the actual urban reserves within each city's boundaries;
Governance Interface reports on formal Indigenous representation within
the machinery of local government; Indigenous Culture as Municipal Asset
reports on the representativeness of Indigenous Peoples in community
services and hiring practices; and Economic and Social Development
reports on partnerships and collaborations.
Methodology
This comparative qualitative case-study research project focused on
the extent of the relationship between municipal governments in
Saskatchewan and Indigenous communities, and how it impacts on policy
formulation and implementation (Ragin 1987; Yin 2009: 18). Three urban
centre cases were "selected on the basis of expectations about
their information content" (Flyvbjerg 2011: 307). Regina, Saskatoon
and Prince Albert are the largest urban centres in Saskatchewan and were
identified as Urban Aboriginal Strategy cities (Canada TBS 2014). Their
Indigenous identity population is significant, comprising 9.2, 9.4 and
44.9 percent of their municipal population respectively (see Table 1).
This study was based on three sources of information. First, data
were gathered by conducting open-ended interviews to elicit input from
participants regarding their position and how it impacted on
Municipal-Indigenous relationships. Participant selection was augmented
by a snowball process to recruit potential participants associated with
municipalities and Indigenous organizations in the three municipalities.
In person interviews were conducted in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince
Albert in May 2016 and telephone interviews between May and December
2016. A total of twelve interviews were conducted with elected municipal
officials (two), municipal government staff (five), provincial
government staff responsible for urban affairs (one) and members of
voluntary organizations and social services associated with local
government (four). Not all participants agreed to have their names or
affiliations reported. (3)
Second, from the interviews and a review of city websites, key
documents regarding Indigenous agreements, programs and services were
gathered from each municipality. The information obtained from
interviews and research admittedly does not report on every detail of
Municipal-Indigenous relations in the three cities, but it does provide
background on the presence of Indigenous entities, their location within
municipal administration, staff complement, initiatives, services and
relationships with other governments or voluntary organizations that
assist them in carrying out their mandate.
Third, the findings from this study are presented in the next
section for Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert in the modified
categories of Walker's framework: Urban Reserves, Governance
Interface, Indigenous Culture as Municipal Asset and Economic and Social
Development (see Table 2 for the summary).
Regina: initiating Indigenous awareness
Regina (known in Cree as oskana ka-asasteki or Pile of Bones),
located in Treaty 4 Territory (see Figure 1), became the capital of
Saskatchewan Territory during the building of the Canadian Pacific
Railway through southern Saskatchewan in the 1880s and became the
provincial capital in 1905. Today it is the second largest city in
Saskatchewan. Regina's North Central neighbourhood has the highest
proportion Indigenous identity population at over 40 percent (Regina
2015:10).
The Regina campus of First Nations University of Canada is located
on Star Blanket Cree Nation's urban reserve, the only urban reserve
within Regina's city limits. The City of Regina has service
agreements or memorandums of understanding (MOU) with several First
Nations: File Hills Qu'Appelle Tribal Council (Protocol Agreement)
(Regina 2007a); Piapot First Nation (Service Agreement) (Regina 2007b);
Star Blanket Cree First Nation and First Nations University of Canada
(Service Agreement) (Regina 2007c).
Governance interface
In 2011, the City of Regina became the first municipality in Canada
to permanently display the Treaty 4 First Nations and the Metis Nation
flags alongside the federal, provincial and city flags outside of City
Hall and within the City Council Chambers according to an interviewee.
They also stated that First Nations and Metis citizens are represented
on City Council Boards and Committees and there is a concerted effort to
attract Indigenous citizens to City Council Boards and Committees (R1).
However, the City of Regina has no formal relationship with urban
Indigenous communities, nor does it have an Indigenous advisory
committee.
According to an interviewee, Regina has initiated Indigenous
awareness, employee committees and recruitment programs. Between 2009 to
2013, Myths and Misconceptions, an Indigenous awareness program,
provided training for most City employees to "improve race
relations and create the capacity for positive and informed
cross-cultural relationship building" between the City of
Regina's Indigenous and non-Indigenous employees and throughout the
broader community. In 2013, the City of Regina established the
Aboriginal City Employees (ACE) committee (Regina 2017), which serves as
an internal Indigenous voice to provide valuable knowledge and advice
across departments. In 2016, Regina began developing a diversity
recruitment and retention strategy (Rl).
Indigenous culture as municipal asset
The North Central Legacy Study (NCLS) started in 2009 as a
preliminary planning assessment of the North Central neighbourhood. Its
objective was to identify key considerations for the development of the
Mamaweyatitan Centre that would centralize teaching and programming
facilities, public library, performing and visual arts, access to Elders
and ceremonial spaces, daycare, community policing services, and other
community services. The project is co-owned and funded by the Regina
Public School Board/ Ministry of Education, the City of Regina, and the
Regina Public Library and opened in June 2017.
The Atoskata Program is a restorative justice project funded by the
City in partnership with Regina Treaty/Status Indian Services Inc. that
puts young offenders to work clearing large items such as mattresses and
sofas from back lanes in inner-city neighbourhoods. The Warriors of the
Water (Indigenous Swim Program) in partnership with Regina Treaty/Status
Indian Services, is designed to provide participants with the training,
skills and knowledge required to learn to swim and become a certified
lifeguard.
Other programs that include representation from Indigenous
organizations are the Regina and Area Drug Strategy initiated by the
City to improve the quality of life for residents with addictions and
provide a safer community by reducing the impact of addictions and crime
related to addiction issues. Regina Intersectoral Partnership (RIP) is
comprised of representatives from municipal, provincial and federal
government departments, health regions, school divisions, Regional
Colleges, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, housing authorities, police, tribal
councils, Metis organizations and representation from the
community-based organization sector. It identified early childhood
development and homelessness as their primary issues.
Regina initially responded to the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission's Calls to Action with two initiatives. Reconciliation
Regina, a report by city staff submitted to council, outlined
initiatives the City could adopt to support the TRC's calls to
action, including "identifying and creating awareness of community
champions to unify the community voice and respond to calls to
action" (Baird 2017). An item not in the report, but discussed at
Council, involved city naming. City staff advised that while the City
has a formal process, changing a street name as part of reconciliation
would go to the civic naming committee followed by public consultation
from First Nation and Metis organizations (Baird 2017; Stevens 2017).
The other initiative, The Learning Cafe Engagement session in March
2017, brought together 150 guests representing about fifteen
organizations to hear from panel speakers and elders on the themes of
employment, education, health and wellbeing and access to services.
Indigenous municipal employment for the City of Regina as of
December 2015 was 6.5 percent: the total number of city employees was
2,782 and the total number of Indigenous employees was 181.
Economic and social development
The cities of Regina and Saskatoon took the lead in organizing and
hosting three conferences that attracted 500 attendees (Rl). Prosperity
Through Partnerships Conferences in 2015/2016 brought together First
Nations, businesses and federal, provincial and municipal governments to
"examine the reserve creation process for the purpose of working
together to increase the economic prosperity and well-being of both the
Saskatchewan First Nations and the Saskatchewan public" (FSIN
2018). The conferences were structured as follows: Land Claims
Implementation in Saskatchewan--An Introduction to Land Development:
Considerations and Collaborations in December 2015 in Saskatoon;
Communities Coming Together: Legislative Options, in Regina in January
2016; Urban Reserve Creation: Opportunities & Partnerships in
Saskatoon in March 2016. A fourth conference, The Importance of
Partnerships with Urban and Rural Municipalities, was held in Saskatoon
in March 2017.
Saskatoon: urban reserve broker
Located on the North Saskatchewan River within Treaty 6 Territory
(see Figure 1), Saskatoon is the largest city in Saskatchewan. While
Indigenous Peoples reside throughout Saskatoon, 20th Street is a hub of
Indigenous community activity, supported by community schools, an urban
reserve and a campus of the Gabriel Dumont Institute. Since the creation
of Asimakaniseekan Askiy urban reserve (McKnight Commercial Centre) in
1988, Muskeg Lake Cree Nation has developed 35 acres in Sutherland (an
industrial and residential suburb of Saskatoon) (Walker and Belanger
2013: 206). The urban reserve is home to First Nations organizations,
financial institutions, a transportation company, medical and dental
clinics, a cafe, a dry cleaner, sports venues, a fine arts and picture
framing shop and a gas station. Other urban reserves in Saskatoon
include Sounding Sky Reserve (One Arrow First Nation), Cree Way Gas West
(Muskeg Lake Cree Nation), a lot (future office building) on 4th Avenue
and 20th Street (Yellow Quill First Nation), and a vacant lot (Red
Pheasant First Nation) (Anderson 2013: 332333; Saskatoon 2018).
While Saskatoon is at the forefront in accommodating urban
reserves, there are no permanent staff responsible for urban reserves.
An interviewee explained that "urban reserves don't get the
attention they deserve" (S2). A Planning Intern was hired for the
summer of 2016 by the Saskatoon Tribal Council and the City to write a
First Nations Communication Protocol Guide. An interviewee explained
that the guide would improve Municipal-First Nation relations by
providing answers to questions, such as, "when you go to Red
Pheasant [reserve] do you take tobacco?" (S2).
Governance interface
Treaty 6 and Metis flags are flown at City Hall. "We Are All
Treaty People" is a phrase that resonated from interviewees in
Saskatoon, even when one of them was asked whether they identified as an
Indigenous person.
Saskatoon has a Race Relations, Municipal Heritage Advisory
Committee, but this committee does not have Indigenous representation,
nor does Saskatoon have an Indigenous advisory body. The Director of
Aboriginal Relations is the one position in City Hall that is tasked
with coordinating programs and services, as well as facilitating
Municipal-Indigenous relations. City staff and community interviewees,
some of whom identified as Indigenous, stressed the working relationship
between Indigenous communities and City Hall. One interviewee said their
organization had "very good rapport with Mayor, Council, Police
Chief and Fire Chief. We built relationships with the public and
Catholic school boards ... We are leaders in our community, we know what
our needs are" (S6). Another interviewee explained, "we work
in a government to government relationship. The question in my mind is
where do we, who do we, how do we make adjustments to best reflect this
community" (S7).
Indigenous culture as municipal asset
The Kitashinaw ("our land" in the Plains Cree Language)
project was conducted in 2013-2014, in collaboration with Saskatoon
Tribal Council, City of Saskatoon, Gabriel Dumont Institute and United
Way of Saskatoon and Area, to discover the programs and service that
serve the Indigenous community in Saskatoon. Additional support was
provided by an Advisory Committee comprised of Aboriginal Affairs and
Northern Development Canada, Central Urban Metis Federation Inc.,
Saskatoon Indian and Metis Friendship Centre, University of
Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Health Region, Greater Saskatoon Catholic School
Division, Saskatoon Public School Division and the YMCA. Key findings in
the Kitaskinaw report include: Aboriginal organizations are an important
part of programs and services in Saskatoon, and a majority of
participants prefer Aboriginal organizations; opportunities exist to
narrow the employment gap between the thirteen percent Aboriginal
unemployed and six percent general population; Aboriginal peoples are
disproportionally affected by homelessness; voting information on
candidates, voting access and transportation to polling stations need to
be improved; and few programs and services were available to Elders and
Aboriginal Seniors (Saskatoon 2014). Another aspect of governance
interface has been the naming of municipal places and streets. According
to the City's website the naming of the North Commuter Parkway will
engage Aboriginal Elders, and Indian Residential School Survivors, the
Saskatoon Reconciliation Committee as well as the naming process
steering committee comprised of: City of Saskatoon, Office of the Treaty
Commissioner, Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations, Saskatoon
Tribal Council, and Central Urban Metis Federation Inc. (Saskatoon
2017).
Saskatoon underwent an Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI)
whose purpose was to measure its cultural competence. The Development
Orientation measures how an organization responds to cultural
differences and commonalities. On a spectrum with five stages (Denial;
Polarization; Minimization; Acceptance; and Adaptation), Saskatoon was
placed closest to Minimization (people in the organization will treat
others as they would like to be treated, based on the assumption that
everybody from different cultures wants the same treatment), two stages
away from Adaptation (people act in an appropriate way outside of their
own culture and "actively seek to build a more diverse and an
inclusive work environment" (Saskatoon 2015: 2). This study
indicates that Saskatoon is not at the optimal Adaptation stage that
best facilitates diversity and inclusiveness.
Saskatoon responded to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
findings by declaring July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 as the Year of
Reconciliation. In May and June 2016, the City of Saskatoon, Office of
the Treaty Commissioner, Saskatoon Tribal Council, Central Urban Metis
Federation and 29 businesses and community organizations hosted a series
of events to promote reconciliation in Saskatoon. The events were
intended to "engage and inspire citizens" on what it means to
reconcile and find their own personal call to action (Saskatoon 2016).
Saskatoon's long term strategy, according to the City's
2013-2023 Strategic Plan, is to "offer an inclusive workplace that
embraces diverse backgrounds" (Saskatoon 2015: 2). In 2014, 8.5%
and in 2015, 8.6% of Saskatoon's Workforce was Aboriginal, falling
short of 2015 SHRC goal of 14% (Saskatoon 2015: 2). "Based on the
size of the City's current workforce, the total number of
Aboriginal employees would need to increase by 190 employees (from 299
to 489) in order to achieve the performance goal set by the City"
(Saskatoon 2015: 5). Aboriginal employees were not distributed among the
employment (permanent, temporary, and seasonal) positions, with the
lowest representation of Aboriginal employees (less than three percent)
found in the Professional and Managerial category and the highest
representation in Labour (sixteen percent) and Operating (eleven
percent) occupational groups (Saskatoon 2015: 6). Aboriginal employees
held a significantly lower percentage of permanent positions, and a
higher percentage of seasonal and temporary positions, when compared to
all municipal employees (Saskatoon 2015: 7).
In 2013, an Equity Quotient Survey measured perceptions of
municipal employees and identified three major barriers for Aboriginal
staff: 25 percent of Aboriginal employees, compared to 70 percent of
other respondents, considered the workplace free from discrimination; 25
percent of Aboriginal employees, compared to 71 other respondents, felt
that harassment policies exist and are enforced; and 75 percent of
Aboriginal employees felt that Aboriginal people working for the city
have fewer opportunities for success (Saskatoon 2015: 8).
Economic and social development
Economic development engagement included the Prosperity Through
Partnerships conferences that took place in 2015/2016 and Saskatoon also
hosted the Importance of Partnerships with Urban and Rural
Municipalities held in March 2017.
Prince Albert: a tale of two cities
Located in central Saskatchewan on the North Saskatchewan River
within Treaty 6 Territory (see Figure 1), Prince Albert is
Saskatchewan's third largest city and the hub for many Northern
communities and for the twelve First Nations in the Prince Albert Grand
Council (Friesen 2016). Prince Albert is geographically divided between
the "west," where there is a higher concentration of
Indigenous Peoples and "east," where there are fewer
Indigenous Peoples, according to interviewees. Prince Albert posted
signage in the community to encourage residents to complete the Census
in May 2016 to determine the correct population for Prince Albert. An
interviewee explained that accurate census returns in Prince Albert
would likely disclose a higher Indigenous population, which should in
turn, increase resources to better serve the Indigenous community (PA2).
The urban reserve that the Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation set out to
create in Prince Albert in 1982 (Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation 1999:159)
was ratified in 1993 (Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation 2017). Commercial
enterprises undertaken by Peter Ballantyne Group of Companies (a
for-profit commercial enterprise) on urban reserves includes a casino,
gas stations, and convenience stores (PBGOC 2017).
Governance interface
The Metis flag is flown at City Hall in Prince Albert. Indigenous
representation consists of one member of the eight-seat city council who
identifies as Metis. Prince Albert acknowledges the Treaty relationship
at public gatherings and officially defines itself as multicultural
community with Indigenous roots (Friesen 2016). Unlike other cities with
significant Indigenous populations, Prince Albert does not have an
Indigenous advisory committee, nor does it have an Indigenous liaison
position at City Hall. An interviewee explained that the city had a Race
Relations Committee, but not under the leadership of the current mayor
(PA2). Another interviewee explained that an informal network is called
upon to discuss Indigenous issues (PA3). The request for an interview
with City staff was responded to by a recreational coordinator because
their position was responsible for programs attended by Indigenous
residents. As far as community interface is concerned an interviewee
explained, the City partners with the Grand Council to host the First
Nations Winter Games (PA1). Another interviewee reported that the
Indigenous community participation in Cultural Days was a token
invitation because other than their dancers starting off one event, the
program did not have Indigenous content. They also observed that the
Mayor is invited to attend Indigenous events such as the Veterans'
supper, but is never available (PA3).
Indigenous culture as municipal asset
In 2015, there were 124 Indigenous employees making up 17.8 percent
of the municipal work force in Prince Albert. The occupational groups
with more than 20 percent of Indigenous employees included Emergency (28
employees), Operatives and Maintenance (47 employees) and Upper
Management (3 employees) (PA 2016). An interviewee reminded the author
that disclosing identity is voluntary and not all city staff choose to
disclose (PA4).
City programs are designed to serve the community at large, but
city staff observe a higher proportion of Indigenous youth participation
for the After-School gym and snacks program, whose goal is to keep
students active. There are seven schools in the weekly program, with a
goal to expand the program's scope to include every school in the
city, for all five school days. At the time of the interview, the grant
funded After-School program reached out to community organizations to
support its program expansion plans. The recreational coordinator is the
city representative for the PA Outreach Program set up by the
Saskatchewan River School Division for youth who have exhausted options
in the education system (PA1).
Economic and social development
This project did not find economic and social development between
the municipality and Indigenous communities in Prince Albert.
Discussion
Overall, there are Municipal-Indigenous relations in each city, and
despite some differences, it is challenging to fully describe them due
to the informal nature of these networks. There also appears to recently
be more visible efforts at relationship building under the banner of
reconciliation, undertaken in Regina and Saskatoon, than in Prince
Albert.
Urban reserves
Not only are urban reserves home to numerous successful businesses,
Indigenous organizations and Tribal Councils, but they are increasing in
number over time, especially in Saskatoon, which has more visible urban
reserves compared to Regina's at First Nations University and
Prince Albert's at the city's west end. While Saskatoon does
not have dedicated planning staff for urban reserves, it has hired an
intern in partnership with the Saskatoon Tribal Council to write a
communication protocol guide to assist the city to improve
Municipal-First Nations relations. Regina and Saskatoon hosted
conferences between 2016 and 2017, to inform First Nations of land
claims and land development, in their efforts to increase Indigenous
economic prosperity. However, these initiatives are working within
structures that were established by the TLEFA in 1992. Despite their
economic successes, urban reserves are not designed to remedy all issues
faced by urban Indigenous Peoples. For example, currently urban reserves
are not equipped to address social issues facing Indigenous Peoples,
such as adequate housing. Ultimately however, urban reserves
"provide a way of re-imaging nationhood beyond the traditional
confines of territorial reserves" (Dubois 2011: 7).
Governance interface
The three cities formally recognize Indigenous Peoples by
displaying Metis flags at City Hall and Regina and Saskatoon display
Treaty flags. Inside City Hall, both Regina and Saskatoon have one staff
member assigned to Indigenous relations, but Prince Albert does not.
None have formal Indigenous advisory committees or Indigenous relations
offices. In comparison, Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Toronto have
either Aboriginal Relations Offices or Aboriginal Advisory Committees
(Heritz 2016) and with the exception of Winnipeg, they have lower
proportion Indigenous-identity populations than the three Saskatchewan
cities. Despite the significant Indigenous-identity population in
Saskatchewan, Indigenous advisory committees or relations offices do not
exist in local government. This aligns with White's finding that
non-Indigenous residents in Saskatchewan are not in favour of government
intervention in Indigenous policy (White et al. 2015: 299).
Regina took the lead in formalizing an Indigenous awareness program
for city staff from 2009 to 2013, creating the ACE association, and
establishing a diversity recruitment and retention strategy for
municipal jobs in 2016.
Recent relationship-building in response to the TRC included the
Learning Cafe engagement sessions in Regina and Saskatoon's
declaration of a Year of Reconciliation. City Council took steps at
Indigenous representation in civic naming in Regina and in the naming of
the North Commuter Bridge in Saskatoon, but Prince Albert did not
identify similar initiatives.
Partnerships between municipal government and community
stakeholders are more recent and evident in the construction of
Regina's Mamaweyatitan Centre and Saskatoon's Kitashinaw
Report, than in Prince Albert. Relationship and partnership creation in
Regina and Saskatoon illustrate Doberstein's (2013) argument that
including Indigenous communities is important for reducing societal
fragmentation.
Aboriginal culture as municipal asset
The number of Indigenous employees in municipal government falls
below the target set by SHRC in all three cities. At an overall
percentage of city employment of almost 18 percent, Prince Albert falls
short of provincially mandated goal of 35 percent Indigenous employment.
Indigenous Peoples are not proportionately spread through the job
categories, and are usually over-represented in labour and seasonal
categories. The low representation of Indigenous employees generally and
in senior positions, specifically, mirrors the absence of Indigenous
advisory councils in all three municipalities despite Young's
recommendation for Indigenous representation in local government (2011:
214).
Economic and social development
Heightened economic network building was undertaken by the
Prosperity Through Partnership conferences in Regina and Saskatoon since
2015 that appears to reach a broader network of participants than those
associated with urban reserves.
Conclusion
This article reported on the relationship between Indigenous
Peoples and municipal government in three cities in Saskatchewan, using
a modified version of Walker's framework of analysis to determine
the extent of the relationship in each municipality. Overall,
Saskatchewan lags in building substantive relationships with Indigenous
Peoples at the local level, despite a significant Indigenous population
that will be increasing over time.
Regina and Saskatoon, the two largest cities in Saskatchewan, are
moving closer to building Indigenous relations than Prince Albert, a
smaller city, but with an Indigenous identity population of over forty
percent. On a positive note, this investigation found more recent
efforts in Municipal-Indigenous relationship-building than in the past,
with Regina and Saskatoon engaging in more reconciliation initiatives
than Prince Albert. One notable exception is the Municipal-Urban Reserve
relationship initiated over 25 years ago, since implemented in all three
municipalities. The TRC motivated both Regina and Saskatoon to undertake
efforts to address the Calls to Action, and led to a Declaration of a
Year of Reconciliation by Saskatoon. Regina and Saskatoon are more
visible in undertaking collaborative projects with Indigenous and
non-Indigenous stakeholders for recent community projects, and they are
beginning to acknowledge Indigenous participation in civic naming.
All three cities lag in meeting Indigenous hiring targets set out
by the SHRC and fall below the level of engagement in establishing
Indigenous advisory committees or Indigenous relations offices, compared
to other Canadian cities with significant Indigenous populations.
Together, these findings indicate that while there are more recent
initiatives toward relationship-building in Regina and Saskatoon, all
three municipalities fall short of establishing formal
Municipal-Indigenous entities to address the issues and interests of
their Indigenous communities.
Several questions arise from this study. First, why do cities in
Saskatchewan with significant Indigenous populations have fewer formal
representative bodies? This finding leans toward affirming a discourse
of prejudice of the mainstream population regarding Indigenous policy in
Saskatchewan. Does it explain why the higher the Indigenous identity
population, the less likely Indigenous advisory bodies exist? While it
may be argued that the Saskatchewan municipalities do not have the
resources to add liaison positions beyond the single permanent staff
member in each of Regina and Saskatoon, it does not explain why the
Saskatchewan cities have not established Indigenous advisory committees,
considering they have significant Indigenous identity populations.
Second, do urban reserves detract from building Municipal-Indigenous
relationships? Despite its relationship with First Nations and INAC and
successes in building economic sustainability, the Municipal-Urban
Reserve arrangement is only one aspect of the Municipal-Indigenous
network, representing a smaller component of the Indigenous identity
population in each city. Future analysis should contemplate whether
municipalities are more focused on the smaller, identifiable
Municipal-Urban Reserve policy networks of building economic
sustainability than the overall Municipal-Indigenous network that
engages in relationship building to address the issues and interests of
all Indigenous communities.
Notes
(1) The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) defined
"Aboriginal" as "Indigenous inhabitants that include the
Indian, Inuit and Metis peoples of Canada" (RCAPv4 1996: xiv).
While this definition is the official discourse of government, it has
been disputed by Indigenous scholars. Andersen argues that the politics
of naming has altered the composition of census recording so that Metis
fails to distinguish members of historic Metis Nation Ancestry (Andersen
2008). This article uses Andersen's definition of "urban
Aboriginal--as a distinctive and equally legitimate form of Aboriginal
identity" (2013a: 47) consisting of twelve elements: economic
marginalization; growing professional/middle class; racism/ social
exclusion; cultural diversity; legal diversity; status blindness; urban
Aboriginal institutions; distinctiveness of urban Aboriginal policy
ethos; the character of informal networks; attachment to non-urban
communities; struggles over the political representation of urban
Aboriginals; and place(s) of Aboriginal women in urban Aboriginal social
relations (Andersen 2013a: 51-63). For some Indigenous scholars,
"Aboriginal" is considered colonial (Lawrence 2004: 21) and
"Indigenous" is least contested.
(2) Walker (2008) initiated a research study comprised of three
stages. The first stage invited a team of collaborators comprised of
Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal scholars and managers of planning,
community development and urban design, and asked them to reach a
consensus on ways to improve the municipal-Aboriginal interface. The
second stage involved responding to the discussion document produced by
the collaborators at stage one, by a second group of participants,
representing seven municipalities and nine Aboriginal community
organizations from across Canada. The second group of participants
provided feedback as to whether they agreed, preferred to add or remove,
what they considered to be the greatest priority areas, opportunities
and challenges. The third stage involved discussing the feedback from
the seven communities by the team of collaborators (26).
(3) The interviews lasted approximately thirty minutes in which
notes were taken. Participants were asked open-ended questions about
their role in, or relationship with, municipal government as it
pertained to Indigenous Peoples. For a copy of the interview questions
please email jheritz@brocku.ca
References
Adams, Michael and Ginger Gosnell-Myers. 2013. "Don't
forget Canada's urban aboriginals. They're not just passing
through." The Globe & Mail (National edition), 22 January: All.
Andersen, Chris. 2013a. "Urban Aboriginality as a distinctive
identity, in twelve parts." In Indigenous in the City: Contemporary
Identities and Cultural Innovation, edited by Evelyn Peters and Chris
Andersen. Vancouver: UBC Press.
--. 2013b. "Urban Aboriginal planning: Towards a
transformative statistical praxis." In Reclaiming Indigenous
Planning, edited by Ryan Walker, Ted Jojola, and David Natcher. Montreal
and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Andersen, Chris and Claude Denis. 2003. "Urban Natives and the
Nation: Before and after the Royal Commission on Aboriginal
Peoples." The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 40:
373-390.
Anderson, Alan B. 2013. "Urban reserves: The development of
urban reserves." In Home in the City: Urban Aboriginal Housing and
Living Conditions, edited by Alan B. Anderson. Toronto: University of
Toronto Press.
Baird, Craig. 2017. "Council receives Reconciliation Regina
progress report, discusses street naming." Regina Leader-Post.
February 3. Available at http://leaderpost.com/news/
local-news/council-receives-reconciliation-regina-progress-report-discusses-street-naming.
Barron, F. Laurie and Joseph Garcia. 1999.
"Introduction."In Urban Indian Reserve: Forging New
Relationships in Saskatchewan, edited by F. Laurie Barron and
JosephGarcia.
Bradford, Neil. 2005. "Place-based public policy: Towards a
new urban and community agenda for Canada." CPRN. Research Report
F/51 Family Network. March 2005.
Bradford, Neil and Jill Anne Chouinard. 2010. "Learning
through evaluation? Reflections on two federal community-building
initiatives." The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 24 (1):
51-77.
Canada. Federal Court. 2016. Daniels v Canada. Available at
http://www.dgwlaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Daniels-Case-Brief-Website.pdf
Canada. Federal Court. Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
1996. Report. Volume 1. Looking Forward Looking Back. Volume 2 Part 1.
Restructuring the Relationship. Volume 4. Perspectives and Realities.
Ottawa: Canada Communications Group Publishing.
Canada. Federal Court. Statistics Canada. 2011a. Saskatchewan
Population Report.http://
www.stats.gov.sk.ca/stats/population/Censuspop2011.pdf
Canada. Federal Court. Statistics Canada. 2011b. Saskatchewan
Aboriginal Peoples, http://
www.stats.gov.sk.ca/stats/pop/20UAboriginal%20People.pdf
Canada. Federal Court. TBS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat).
2014. www.tbs-sct.gc.ca.
Canada. Federal Court. Western Economic Diversification
Canada--Saskatchewan Region. 2016. Urban Reserves in Saskatchewan,
http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collecuon_2016/deo-wd/Iu92-4-36-2005-eng.pdf.
Doberstein, C. 2013. "Metagovernance of urban governance
networks in Canada: In pursuit of legitimacy and accountability."
Canadian Public Administration 56 (4): 584-609.
Dubois, Janique. 2011. "Beyond territory: Revisiting the
normative justification of self- government in theory and
practice." International Indigenous Policy Journal 2 (2): 1-10.
https://doi. org/10.18584/iipj.2011.2.2.1.
Environics. 2010. The Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study. Toronto:
Environics Institute, 2010. Available at http://uaps.ca.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2011. "Case study." In The SAGE Handbook
of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S.
Lincoln. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Friesen, Joe. 2016. "First Nations: Canada's growing
indigenous population reshaping cities across the country." The
Globe and Mail (National edition), December 26: A12.
Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN). 2018. Available
at https://www.fsin.com/ prosperity-
through-partnerships-creating-wealth-tlirough-land-claims/
Heritz, Joanne. 2016. "Municipal-Aboriginal advisory
committees in four Canadian cities: 1999-2014." Canadian Public
Administration 59 (1): 134-152.
Kushner, Joseph and David Siegel. 2003. "Effect of municipal
amalgamations in Ontario on political representation and
accessibility." Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (5):
1035-1051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/50008423903778950.
Leo, Christopher, Martine August, Mike Pyl, and Matthew D. Rogers.
2012. "Multilevel Governance without Municipal Government:
Minimalist Government in Winnipeg." In Sites of Governance:
Multilevel Governance and Policy Making in Canada's Big Cities,
edited by Martin Horak, Robert Young. Montreal & Kingston:
McGill-Queen's University Press.
Laliberte, Ronald F. 2013. "Exploring the construction,
retention, and maintenance of urban Metis identity." In Indigenous
In The City: Contemporary Identities and Cultural Innovation, edited by
Evelyn Peters and Chris Andersen. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Ouart, Pamela and The Saskatoon Indian and Metis Friendship Centre.
2013. "Laying the groundwork for co-production." In Indigenous
In The City: Contemporary Identities and Cultural Innovation, edited by
Evelyn Peters and Chris Andersen. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation. 1999. "The Opawakoscikan Reserve
in Prince Albert." In Urban Indian Reserves: Forging New
Relationships in Saskatchewan, edited by F. Laurie Barron and Joseph
Garcia. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing.
Peter Ballantyne Group of Companies. 2017. pbgoc.com.
Peters, Evelyn and Carol Lafond. 2013. "I basically mostly
stick with my own kind." In Indigenous In The City: Contemporary
Identities and Cultural Innovation, edited by Evelyn Peters and Chris
Andersen. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Regina. 2017. Aboriginal City Employees. Available at
https://www.aboriginalcareers.ca/ regina/
Regina. 2015. City of Regina. North
Central.https://www.regina.ca/opencms/export/sites/ regina.ca/residen
ts/city-plarming/.media/pdf/2015-neighbourhood-profiles/north-central.pdf
Regina. 2007a. City of Regina and File Hills Qu'Appelle Tribal
Council (Protocol Agreement). Available at
http://www.regina.ca/opencms/export/sites/regina.ca/residents/social-grants-programs/. media/pdf/city-of-regina-and-file-hills-quappelle-tribal-council. pdf.
Regina. 2007b. City of Regina and Piapot First Nation (Service
Agreement). Available at http://
www.regina.a/opencms/export/sites/regina.ca/residents/social-grants-programs/. media/pdf/city-of-regina-and-piapot-first-nation.pdf
Regina. 2007c. City of Regina, Star Blanket Cree First Nation and
First Nations University of Saskatchewan. (Service Agreement). Available
at http://www.regina.ca/opencms/export/
sites/regina.ca/residents/social-grants-programs/.media/pdf/
city-of-regina-and-starblanket-cree-nation-first-nations-universtity-and-regina-police-service.pdf
Saskatchewan. SHRC (Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission). 2016.
Annual Report 2015/2016.
Saskatchewan. Office of the Treaty Commissioner. 2018. Treaty
Boundaries Map For Saskatchewan. Available at
http://www.otc.ca/public/uploads/resource_photo/treatymap_large.pdf
Saskatoon. 2018. Community Engagement. Urban Reserves in Saskatoon:
Frequently Asked Questions. Available at
https://www.saskatoon.ca/sites/default/files/documents/community-services/ planning-development/future-growth/urban-reserves-treaty-land-entitlement/urban_reserve_faq.pdf
Saskatoon. 2014. Kitaskinaw: An Environmental Scan of Programs and
Services Serving Aboriginal People in Saskatoon 2013-2014. Available at
https://www.saskatoon.ca/sites/
default/files/documents/community-services/recreation-sport/kitaskinaw_report.pdf
Saskatoon. 2017. City of Saskatoon. Year of Reconciliation
Activities. Available at https://www.
saskatoon.ca/community-culture-heritage/cultural-diversity/aboriginal-relations
Saskatoon. 2015. Diversity and Inclusion Report--2015. City of
Saskatoon Corporate Performance Department.
Soonias, S., H. Exner-Pirot, M. Salat and A. Shah.2016. City of
Bridges: First Nations and Metis Economic Development in Saskatoon b
Region. SREDA: Saskatoon.
Stabler, Jack C. and M. R. Olfert. 1994. "Saskatchewan's
Rural Communities in an Urbanizing World." Rural Development
Perspectives 9 (2): 21-28.
Stevens, Andrew. 2017. Council Discussion on Truth and
Reconciliation. Available at http://
www.andrewstevensward3.ca/council_discussion_on_trc.
Walker, Ryan. 2008. "Improving the interface between urban
municipalities and Aboriginal communities." Canadian Journal of
Urban Research 17 (1): 20-36.
Walker, Ryan and Yale Belanger. 2013. "Aboriginality and
planning in Canada's large prairie cities." In Reclaiming
Indigenous Planning, edited by Ryan Walker, Ted Jojola and David
Natcher. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
White, Stephen, Michael M. Atkinson, Loleen Berdahl, and David
McGrane. 2015. "Public policies toward Aboriginal peoples:
Attitudinal obstacles and uphill battles." Canadian Journal of
Political Science. 48 (2): 281-304.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423915000281.
Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th
edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Young, Robert. 2011. "Conclusion." In Urban Aboriginal
Policy Making in Canadian Municipalities, edited by Evelyn J. Peters.
Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Joanne Heritz is Instructor, Department of Political Science, Brock
University, St. Catharines, Ontario. Financial support was provided by
McMaster University Arts Research Board. The author thanks Janique
Dubois and the Journal's reviewers.
Caption: Figure 1. Treaty Boundaries Map for Saskatchewan [Colour
figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Table 1. Indigenous Identity Population
Popidation Indigenous Indigenous
Identity Identity
Percentage
Saskatchewan 1,033,381 15.4 153,000
Regina 210,556 9.4 19,785
Saskatoon 260,600 9.2 23,890
Prince Albert 35,129 44.9 15,775
First Metis
Nations Population
Population
Saskatchewan 103,205 52,450
Regina 11,180 8,225
Saskatoon 11,750 11,515
Prince Albert 9,605 6,170
Canada 2011a. Saskatchewan Population Report; Canada 2011b.
Saskatchewan Aboriginal Peoples.
Table 2. Summary Table
Regina Saskatoon Prince Albert
Urban Reserves
First Nations Asimakaniseekan Chief Joseph
University Askiy Reserve Custer, Northern
(Star Blanket aka McKnight Lights,
Cree Nation) Commercial Kistapinanihk,
Centre (Muskeg Chief Philip
Lake Cree Morin (Peter
Nation)-- Ballantyne Cree
Sounding Sky Nation)
Reserve (One
Arrow First
Nation)--Cree
Way Gas West
(Muskeg Lake
Cree Nation)--
Lot on 4th
Avenue and 20th
Street (Yellow
Quill First
Nation)--Lot now
within city
limits (Red
Pheasant Cree
Nation)
Governance Interface
Indigenous One One
Liaison Staff
Advisory Bodies Informal Network Informal Network Informal Network
Indigenous Aboriginal City
Awareness Employees (ACE)
--2009-2013
Myths and
Misconceptions
Indigenous Culture as Municipal Asset
Programs and Mamaweyatitan 2013-2014 After School
Events Centre Kitaskinaw Program--First
--Atoskata Aboriginal Nations Winter
Program Warriors Leadership Games
of the Water Program--
Intercultural
Development
Inventory--
Civic Naming
(North Commuter
Parkway)
Truth and Reconciliation 2015-16 Year of
Reconciliation Regina Reconciliation
Commission --Learning Cafe
--Civic Naming
Indigenous City 6.5 % (2015) 8.6% (2015) 17.8% (2015)
Staff
Economic &
Social
Development
Prosperity Prosperity
Through Through
Partnerships-- Partnerships
First Nations --First Nations
COPYRIGHT 2018 Institute of Public Administration of Canada
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.