A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY.
Jayabal, R. ; Balasubramanian, K.
A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY OF INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY.
1. Introduction
Scientometrics studies have been applied mainly to scientific
fields and empirical investigation of publications in specific
scientific fields and subfields. It examines quantitative aspects of
science, science of science, and scientific communication. This type of
analysis provides useful indicators of scientific productivity and
trends in the particular field. The term scientometric was coined in
Russia by Nalimov. Since Nalimov's coinage of the Russian
equivalent of the term 'Scientometrics' (naukometriya) in
1969, this term has grown in popularity and is used to describe the
study of science: growth, structure, interrelationships and productivity
(Hood & Wilson [1]). According to Haiturn [2]
"Scientometric" is a scientific discipline which performs
reproducible measurement of scientific activity and reveals it objective
quantitative regularities. Hence, scientometric studies aims to
integrate the cognitive or intellectual structure of research with a
view to appraise the relations among the authors, institutions, journal
articles and as a means of assisting the peer-review procedure. The main
purpose of the scientometric studies is to determine the state and
prospect of a subject and its future development. The present study aims
to apply the scientometric technique to know the publication trends in
the Indian Journal of Chemical Technology.
2. Review of Literature
Numbers of scientometric analysis studies have been conducted
through the world. Out of them, two studies results are presented
briefly. Padme and Vaishali [3] conducted a bibliometric analysis of
'Indian Journal of Chemistry- Section A'. The Indian Journal
of Chemistry-Section A published 482 research papers during the period
of study i.e. from 2010 to 2014. The journal has published on an average
of 96 research papers per year. The Double authors contributed the
maximum numbers of papers 119 (24.69%). The 653 contributors from 36
countries, India stands first place with the 66.76 percent of
contributions and among Indian state wise distribution of the
contributors, West Bengal stand first place with 71(16.28%)
contributions. Nattur [4] analysis of 829 articles published in the
Indian Journal of Physics during the year from 2004 to 2008 reveals that
maximum number of articles published in the year 2004. The important
note of the study is that the majority of the articles are contributed
by multiple authors and majority of the authors were affiliated to
Universities. Ninety-two percent of the contributors were belonged to
India and eight per cent belonged to other countries. Among the India,
contributors belonged to Karnataka dominated the other states in India.
3. The Source Journal
National Communication and Information Resources (NISCAIR) [5] came
into existence on 30 September 2002 with the merger of National
Institute of Science Communication (NISCOM) and Indian National
Scientific Documentation Centre (INSDOC). Both NISCOM and INSDOC, the
two premier institutes of the Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR), were devoted to dissemination and documentation of
science and technology information. Now, with the formation of NISCAIR,
an institute capable of serving the society using modern IT
infrastructure in a more effective manner and taking up new ventures in
the field of science communication, dissemination and science and
technology information management systems and services. Broadly the core
activity of NISCAIR will be to collect/store, publish and disseminate
science and technology information through a mix of traditional and
modern means, which will benefit different segments of society. All
publications of the Niscair publications are freely available in its web
site and mobile app designed by Niscair. NISCAIR has been publishing 18
research journals in field of science and technology. The Indian Journal
of Chemical Technology is one of the research publications in chemical
technology. This bimonthly journal included novel and original research
finding as well as reviews in the areas of Chemical Engineering,
Catalysis, Leather Processing, Polymerization, Membrane Separation,
Pharmaceuticals and Drugs, Agrochemicals, Reaction Engineering,
Biochemical Engineering, Petroleum Technology, Corrosion and Metallurgy
and Applied Chemistry. It's published in the month of January,
March, May, July, September and November every year. Impact factor of
IJCT is 0.348 (JCR 2017).
4. Objectives of the study
The main objective of the present paper is to examine the
publication trends in the field of chemical engineering and technology.
The other objectives are as follows:
* To find out the year wise distribution of papers
* To identify the authorship pattern
* To find out the collaborative pattern in the field of the
chemical engineering and technology
* To determine the geographical wise distributions of papers
* To know the year wise distribution of references appended with
the papers.
5. Methodology
The present scientometric study conducted for the purpose to know
the publication trends in the field of chemical engineering and
technology. The study analyses in detail, the bibliographic attributes
of the papers and reference appended at the end of each papers in the
Indian journal of chemical technology. Data collected from the
journal's web site
(http://www.niscair.res.in/sciencecommunication/researchiournals/reiour/iict/iictQ.asp). Six hundred and forty sixty papers from ten volumes of
the years from 2008 to 2017 have been taken for consideration of the
present study. The information about the year wise distribution of
research papers, single and multi author's contributions, and
nativity pertains to authors and reference appended to papers were
collected. The collected data are organized, tabulated and calculated by
using simple statistical methods with the help of MS - Excel. Apart from
the general statistical analysis, some of the important bibliometric
indicators like Degree of Collaboration (DC), Collaborative Index (CI),
Collaborative Coefficient (CC), Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Doubling
Time (DT) are calculated and described in the following paragraphs.
6. Data Analysis and Interpretation
6.1. Year and Issue -Wise Distribution of the Papers
Table 1 indicates the number of papers published in the Indian
Journal of Chemical Technology during the periods from 2008 to 2017. It
is evident from the table-1 that publications of the source journal was
irregular during the study period on three occasions, i.e., September
and November 2014 issues, January and March 2015 issues and May and June
2015 issues. Five issues in 2014 and four issues in 2015 were brought
out. However, before and after 2014 and 2015, the journal has been
publishing regularly with all the six issues and with more number of
papers. The result indicates that maximum 96 papers (14.86%) published
in 2008 and minimum 46 papers (7.12 %) in 2015. The study journal
published on an average of 64.6 papers per year during the study period.
6.2. Relative Growth Rate and Doubling Time
The research outcomes from the Indian Journal of Chemical
Technology during the period from 2008 to 2017 were measure with the
scientometric techniques Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Doubling Time
(DT) [6]. It is evidence from the Table 2 that the relative growth rate
and doubling time of research outcomes have been fluctuating from 0.10
to 0.55 and from 1.27 to 7.20 respectively during the study period.
6.3. Authorship Pattern
Table 3 indicates the authorship pattern of research papers
published in the Indian Journal of Chemical Technology during the period
under study. It reveals that ninety six percent of the papers were
written by multiple authors and on the other hand single author's
contribution was 3.87 percent during the study period.
6.4. Collaboration Measures
The collaborative authorship is a well recognized feature of modem
science. The study on "Authorship trend and collaborative research
in Genetics and plant breeding" conducted by Mallinath Kumbar and
N.G.Kumar [7] found that intellectual sharing took place by two or more
scientists. Multiple authors' researches are very familiar in the
present days. To evaluate the Lawani's Collaborative Index and
Subramanian's Degree of Collaboration, Isola Ajiferuk [8] and
others introduce the new collaboration measure Collaboration
Coefficient. The above mentioned three collaboration measures are
calculated and presented in the table 4. Subramanian [9]'s Degree
of Collaboration follows between 0.89 and 1.00 , Collaboration Index
between 2.84 and 3.36 and Collaboration Coefficient between 0.56 and
0.66, the present study's result proved the previous studies
statement and collaborative authorship pattern exist in field of
Chemical Engineering and Technology during the study period.
6.5. Country Wise Distribution of Contributors
The country wise distributions of the contributors are presented in
the table 5. During the period of study, totally 646 research papers
were contributed by 2074 contributors from 37 countries. Among the 37
countries, nearly 74.25 percent of the contributors are belonged to
India and remaining 25.75 percent of the contributors are belongs to the
foreign countries. India (74.25%) stands first place followed by China
on second place (6.03 %) and Iran on third place with (5.79%).
6.6. Indian States and Union Territories Wise Distribution of
Contributors
Table 6 depicts the Indian states and union territories wise
distribution of the contributors. The result shows that among 1540
Indian contributors, more than two hundred contributors are belonged to
Tamil Nadu and the contributors, between 100 and 200, belonged to
Maharashtra (191); Karnataka (162); Uttarpradesh (132) and Gujarat
(100). The remaining 723 contributors are belonged to remaining 17
Indian States and Union Territories.
6.7. Year wise Distribution of References
Table 7 displays the number of references cited by the authors in
their papers. Out of the 646 papers, 226 papers (34.98%) have 21 - 30
references, followed by 213 papers (32.97%) with more than 30
references, 117 papers (27.40%) with 11 - 20 references and 30 papers
(4.64%) with 1 -10 references. Table also indicates the year -wise
distribution of number of references.
6.8. Average Number of References per Year
Table 8 focuses the average number of references appended to the
papers during the study period. The totals of 17,862 references were
cited in 646 papers during the study period in the source journal. Out
of the 17862 reference, more than two thousand references were cited in
the papers published in the years 2008, 2009 and 2017 and the minimum
1304 references were contained in the papers published in 2015. The
averages of 27.65 references were cited per paper in the journal during
the study periods.
8. Conclusions
The study deals with the scientometric analysis of the five years
(2013-2017) research publications of Indian Journal of Chemical
Technology. An average number of paper published during the study
periods are 64. The study of authorship pattern shows dominance of two
authored, three authored and four authored research papers. Mallinath
Kumbar and N.G.Kumar found that intellectual sharing took place by two
or more scientists. Multiple authors' researches is very familiar
in the present days. The present day also proved this statement. Seventy
four percent of contributors were belonged to India and twenty six
percent belonged to other countries. Among the Indian contributors, more
than hundred contributors are belonged to Tamilnadu, Maharashtra,
Karnataka, Uttarpradesh and Gujarat.
References
[1.] Hood W W and Wilson C, The literature of bibliometric,
scientometrics, and informetrics, Scientometrics, 52 (2) (2001) 291-314.
[2.] Zafrunnisha N and PullaReddy V, Sources of scientometrics,
PEARL : A Journal of Library and Information Science, 3 (1) (2009)
49-51.
[3.] Padme S L and Vaishali K, Bibliometric analysis of Indian
Journal of Chemistry- Section A, International Journal of Information
Dissemination and Technology, 6 (2) (2016) 103-106.
[4.] Nattar S, Indian Journal of Physics: A Scientometric analysis,
International Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(4) (2009)
55-61.
[5.] http://www.niscair.res.in/ (Accessed on 16.06.2018)
[6.] Ravichandra Rao I K and Neelameghan A, Scientometrics, (Ess
Ess Publications; New Delhi), 2014, 239-252.
[7.] Kumbar M and Kumar M G, Authorship trend and collaborative
research in genetics and plant breeding, SRELS Journal of Information
Management, 48(2) (2011) 113-122.
[8.] Ajiferuke Isola, Burell Q and Tague Jean, Collaborative
Coefficient: a single measure of the degree of collaboration in
research, Scientometrics, 14 (5-6) (1988) (421-433).
[9.] Subramanyam K, Bibliometric studies as research collaboration:
a review, Journal of Information Science, 6 (1993) 35.
R Jayabal (a) and K Balasubramanian (b)
Librarian(SG), Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidyalaya College of Arts
and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu E-mail: iavabalraiu@gmail.com
Research Scholar, Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidyalaya College of Arts
and Science , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
E-mail: balasubramanian171176@gmail.com
R Jayabal Sri Ramakrishna Mission Vidyalaya College of Arts and
Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, jayabalraju@gmail.com
K Balasubramanian Research Scholar, Sri Ramakrishna Mission
Vidyalaya College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India,
balasubramanian171176@gmail.com
Table 1: Year and Issue -Wise Distribution of Papers
S. No. Month of 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Publications
1 January 16 13 10 10 10 10
2 March 16 11 11 10 10 10
3 May 16 12 10 10 10 10
4 July 16 12 10 9 10 10
5 September 16 12 10 10 10 9
6 November 16 10 11 10 10 10
7 Total 96 70 62 59 60 59
8 % 14.86 10.84 9.60 9.13 9.29 9.13
S. No. Month of 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Publications
1 January 10 12 * 10 15 116
2 March 9 9 14 100
3 May 10 12 * 12 12 114
4 July 10 11 13 101
5 September 10 * 11 15 13 116
6 November 11 12 9 99
7 Total 49 46 69 76 646
8 % 7.59 7.12 10.68 11.76 100.00
* combined issues
Table 2: Relative Growth Rate and Doubling Time of Papers
S. Year No. of Cumulative No. W1 W2 RGR Doubting
No. Papers of Papers Time (Dt)
1 2008 96 96 4.56
2 2009 70 166 4.56 5.11 0.55 1.27
3 2010 62 228 5.11 5.43 0.32 2.18
4 2011 59 287 5.43 5.66 0.23 3.01
5 2012 60 347 5.66 5.85 0.19 3.65
6 2013 59 406 5.85 6.01 0.16 4.41
7 2014 49 455 6.01 6.12 0.11 6.08
8 2015 46 501 6.12 6.22 0.10 7.20
9 2016 69 570 6.22 6.35 0.13 5.37
10 2017 76 646 6.35 6.47 0.13 5.54
Table 3: Authorship Pattern
S. Year Type of Authors Total
No.
Single Double Three Four More than
four authors
1 2008 1 33 30 19 13 96
2 2009 4 26 20 14 6 70
3 2010 7 22 15 10 8 62
4 2011 2 20 20 11 6 59
5 2012 1 18 22 11 8 60
6 2013 3 11 25 14 6 59
7 2014 1 15 11 15 7 49
8 2015 0 15 12 10 9 46
9 2016 3 18 14 19 15 69
10 2017 3 21 21 18 13 76
Total 25 199 190 141 91 646
% 3.87 30.80 29.41 21.83 14.09 100.00
Table 4: Collaboration Measures
S. Year Single Multiple Total DC * CI ** CC ***
No. Author Authors
1 2008 1 95 96 0.99 3.10 0.64
2 2009 4 66 70 0.94 2.89 0.59
3 2010 7 55 62 0.89 2.84 0.56
4 2011 2 57 59 0.97 2.98 0.62
5 2012 1 59 60 0.98 3.12 0.64
6 2013 3 56 59 0.95 3.15 0.64
7 2014 1 48 49 0.98 3.24 0.65
8 2015 0 46 46 1.00 3.28 0.66
9 2016 3 66 69 0.96 3.36 0.65
10 2017 3 73 76 0.96 3.22 0.64
Total 25 621 646 0.96 3.11 0.63
* Degree of Collaboration ** Collaborate Index *** Collaborate
Coefficient
Table 5: Country Wise Distribution of Contributors
S. No. Country No. of %
Contributors
1 India 1540 74.25
2 China 125 6.03
3 Iran 120 5.79
4 Turkey 56 2.70
5 Croatia 35 1.69
6 Bangladesh 33 1.59
7 Malaysia 27 1.30
8 Egypt 22 1.06
9 Mexico 11 0.53
10 Thailand 11 0.53
11 Vietnam 8 0.39
12 Iraq 8 0.39
13 Saudi Arabia 8 0.39
14 South Africa 7 0.34
15 Morocco 7 0.34
16 Algeria 6 0.29
17 Nigeria 6 0.29
18 Sri Lanka 5 0.24
19 Spain 4 0.19
20 Russia 4 0.19
21 Ethiopia 4 0.19
22 South Korea 4 0.19
23 Venezuela 4 0.19
24 Pakistan 3 0.14
25 Serbia 2 0.10
26 Singapore 2 0.10
27 Canada 2 0.10
28 Zimbabwe 1 0.05
29 USA 1 0.05
30 Norway 1 0.05
31 UK 1 0.05
32 Kuwait 1 0.05
33 Korea 1 0.05
34 France 1 0.05
35 Indonesia 1 0.05
36 Germany 1 0.05
37 Czech Republic 1 0.05
Total 2074 100.00
Table 6: Indian States and Union Territories Wise Distribution of
Contributors
S. No. States / Union No. of %
Territories Contributors
1 Tamil Nadu 232 15.06
2 Maharashtra 191 12.40
3 Karnataka 162 10.52
4 Uttarpradesh 132 8.57
5 Gujarat 100 6.49
6 West Bengal 82 5.32
7 Madhyapradesh 75 4.87
8 Odisha 70 4.55
9 Kerala 64 4.16
10 Rajasthan 59 3.83
11 Delhi 52 3.38
12 Assam 52 3.38
13 Jharkhand 48 3.12
14 Telangana 43 2.79
15 Haryana 41 2.66
16 Andhrapradesh 39 2.53
17 Punjab 37 2.40
18 Jammu & Kashmir 18 1.17
19 Chhattisgarh 17 1.10
20 Uttarakhand 15 0.97
21 Himachalpradesh 9 0.58
22 Goa 2 0.13
Total 1540 100.00
Table 7: Year wise Distribution of References
No. of Reference Total
Year
1-10 11-20 21-30 More than 30
2008 8 32 38 18 96
2009 2 24 27 17 70
2010 3 23 19 17 62
2011 1 12 21 25 59
2012 3 21 23 13 60
2013 3 14 25 17 59
2014 1 11 15 22 49
2015 2 10 13 21 46
2016 7 18 22 22 69
2017 0 12 23 41 76
Total 30 177 226 213 646
% 4.64 27.40 34.98 32.97 100.00
Table 8: Average No. of References per Year
Particulars 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
No. of Papers 96 70 62 59 60 59
Total No. of 2188 2203 1558 1718 1544 1549
References
Average 22.79 31.47 25.13 29.12 25.73 26.25
Number of
References
per Paper
Particulars 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
No. of Papers 49 46 69 76 646
Total No. of 1480 1304 1753 2565 17862
References
Average 30.20 28.35 25.41 33.75 27.65
Number of
References
per Paper
COPYRIGHT 2018 University of Idaho Library
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.