Mapping the Research Productivity of Three Medical Sciences Journals Published in Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Bibliometric Study.
Alanazi, Ahmad A. ; Baladi, Zameer ; Haq, Ikram Ul 等
Mapping the Research Productivity of Three Medical Sciences Journals Published in Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Bibliometric Study.
1. Introduction
Saudi Arabia (SA) has been playing a leading role in the
development of scientific knowledge in the Arab world and progressing
rapidly in field of scholarly communication. The Saudi government
provides a huge support for improving education, research and
innovations. Therefore, the number of degree awarding research
institutions and scholarly journals has increased since 2000,
accordingly the research activities particularly in health sciences have
been growing (Al-Bishri, 2013; Latif, 2015; Meo, Hassan, & Usmani,
2013). Scientific productivity is usually considered fundamental to
scientific career advancement. To examine and assess the scientific
productivity of publications in any particular subject at any specific
time, a bibliometric analysis is useful via the use of citation
indicators. This type of statistical analysis was firstly described by
Prichard (1969) as "statistical bibliography" and defined as
"the application of mathematics and statistical methods to books
and other media of communication." (p. 348)
The bibliometric studies in health sciences have become popular
because funding organizations, scientists and policy makers request
frequent assessment of the research activities. The bibliometric studies
assist in (a) classifying weak and strong areas of published research,
(b) identifying productive researchers and institutions, and (c)
recognizing collaborative patterns to conduct research. Scientific
progress of any institution or specialty can be determined by the growth
and the impact of the published research (Baladi & Umedani 2017;
Ullah et al., 2016). Scholarly journals are the major channel for
communication and disseminating research results to the scientific
community around the world. These journals allow researchers with a
platform to publish their research findings and provide up-to-date
information in the research field of their interest (Mohan & Rajgoli
2017). The present study aimed to compare bibliometric indicators and
ascertain the growth of research outcomes among Saudi medical research
journals. To combine between old and new established journals with
different scope and spectrum, three journals (a) Saudi Journal of
Medicine and Medical Sciences (SJMMS), (b) Journal of Saudi Heart
Association (JSHA), (c) Journal of Infection and Public Health (JIPH)
for the period of 2013 to 2017 were selected.
1.1 Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS)
SJMMS is a peer-reviewed journal published by Imam Abdulrahman Bin
Faisal University. This journal publishes three issues in English per
year, and its first issue was published in January 2013. The scope of
SJMMS covers the area of health specialties. SJMMS is available in print
and online (http://www.sjmms.net/).
1.2 Journal of the Saudi Heart Association (JSHA)
JSHA is a peer-reviewed journal published by King Saud University
in collaboration with Elsevier. JSHA is the official publication of the
Saudi Heart Association. This journal publishes four issues in English
per year, and its first issue was published in 1988. The scope of JSHA
is cardiovascular diseases. JSHA is available in print and online
(http://www.iournalofthesaudiheart.com/).
1.3 Journal of Infection and Public Health (JIPH)
JIPH is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Ministry of
National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for
Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), and the Saudi Association for Public Health
in collaboration with Elsevier. JIPH published two issues in English per
year in 2008, but JIPH has started publishing bi-monthly since 2011. The
scope of the journal covers the area of infection prevention and
control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the
application of healthcare epidemiology. JIPH is available in print and
online (http://www.iiph.org/).
2. Methods
This is an introspective observational study carried out in the
College of Applied Medical Sciences, KSAU-HS. The study data was taken
from the websites of the targeted journals and mainly segregated based
on three parameters: (a) the growth of publication, (b) types of
publication, and (c) the authorship pattern. Excel spreadsheets were
used for calculating and analyzing the data.
2.1 Objectives
The specific objective of the current study addresses the following
aspects:
1. The growth of publication that compares the year and issue
distribution of publications.
2. The types of publication that include the assessment of original
and review articles, short communications, and case and short reports.
3. The authorship pattern that identifies the authorship pattern
and research collaboration.
2.2 Literature Review
The review of relevant literature revealed some bibliometric
studies that were conducted in SA. Alhaider, Ahmed, and Gupta (2015)
analyzed 1386 pharmaceutical research produced in SA from 2001 to 2010.
The study revealed that Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal was on the top list
of 15 journals with 145 articles, King Saud University found to be most
productive institution with 505 papers. Saquib et al. (2017) conducted a
bibliometric assessment for 295 articles on cardiovascular diseases
published during 1986 to 2015 in SA. The study focused on the type of
cardiovascular diseases and research design and did not identify the
journals' rank and origin.
Haq, Al Fouzan, and Baladi (2017) examined 45 research on oncology
for the period of 2007-2015. The majority of the articles (n=33) were
published in international journals, leaving only nine articles
published in local journals. Shehatta and Mahmood (2016) inspected
88,506 research articles produced by Saudi researchers from 1980 to
2014. Of the total papers, 28% were about medical and health sciences.
The majority of the articles were published in two Saudi journals
indexed in the Web of Science: Saudi Medical Journal and Annals of Saudi
Medicine. Latif (2015) reviewed 1562 research articles conducted by
Saudi researchers for the period 2008-2012. The findings showed that 76%
of the papers were original research articles and only one fourth of
them were published in journals with high impact factor.
Al-Bishri (2013) evaluated 1905 articles published by Saudi authors
in PubMed index journals between 2010 and 2011. The majority of the
articles (n=216, 15.5%) focused on the community medicine with some
published in high impact factor journals, such as New England Journal of
Medicine and Lancet. The author concluded that SA was lagging behind in
medical research and offered possible suggestions to increase the rate
of research output in SA. The literature review showed several
bibliometric assessment studies conducted in SA; however, to the best of
our knowledge, the literature lacks a bibliometric study that compared
between journals. The current study aims to fill this gap.
3. Results
3.1 Growth of Publication
As indicated in Table 1 and Figure 1, 827 articles were published
in 64 issues with an average of 12.92 articles per issue in the three
journals. JIPH published 439 articles with an average of 14.6 articles
per issue in 30 issues. SJMMS published 195 articles with an average of
13.9 articles per issue in 14 issues. JSHA published 193 articles with
an average of 9.6 articles per issue in 20 issues. During the period
between 2013 and 2017, the maximum of 43 articles and minimum of 8
articles were published in 30 issues of JIPH, the maximum of 20 and
minimum of 10 articles were recorded in all 14 issues of SJMMS, and
finally the maximum of 12 and minimum of 7 articles were published in 20
issues of JSHA.
3.2 Types of Publication
Figure 2 and Table 2 present the distrbution of published research
according to type. Out of the 827 published papers, 514 (62.15%) were
original articles followed by 173 (20.92%) case reports, 82 (9.92%)
review articles, and other publication types. Total of 5312 pages was
written in the three journals in all types of publication during the
targeted period with an average of 6.42 pages per articles. The ratio of
the number of pages was higher in SJHA (6.44) than in JIPH (5.14) and
SJMMS (4.91). The total of 20,777 references were used to write the 827
research papers with mean value of 25.12 reference per article. The
referecnce fraction was higher in JIPH (26.89) comapred to SJHA (23.67)
and SJMMS (22.55).
3.3 Authorship Pattern
All the 827 research papers were written by 3808 authors with an
average of 4.6 authors per article. The number of authors of 439
articles published in JIPH was 2257 authors with an average of 5.1
authors per article. The total of 951 authors with an avarage of 4.92
authors per article published 193 papers in JSHA. The 195 papers that
were published in SJMMS were authored by 600 rsearchers with an avarage
of 3.07 authors per article. Table 3 shows the total number of authors
per journal for the period of 2013-2017. Figure 3 depicts that the
majority of research articles (n=746; 90.2%) were carried out by groups
of researchers rather than by single authors. Only 81 (9.7%) papers were
produced by signle authors. Authorship patten disclosed that four
authored papers ranked first in order sharing (19.8%) of the total
research ouput followed by three authored papers taking 16.9% of the
total research contributions. Only 36 (4.3%) articles were conducted by
[greater than or equal to] 10 authors.
4. Discussion
Journals are tools that disseminate the scholarly communication
among the scientific community around the globe. Bibliometric analyses
of the journals' literature provide valuable information in terms
of the productivity of authors, type and quality of research, and
development of the journal in a specific field. SA was in the 50th
position of scientific publication with 2402 papers according to SCImago
Journal and Country Rank (SJR, 2018), which is a publically available
portal that includes journal and country scientific indicators developed
according to the Scopus database. However, the numbers of Saudi
scholarly publication were rapidly accelerated in last decade and
reached 32nd position in 2016 with 19918 papers. The current
bibliometric analyzed the literature of three free to access Saudi
journals specialized in medicine and medical sciences, public health,
and cardiology. This analysis was based on the publications data
consisting of 827 research papers published during 2013-2017. The rising
tendency of scholarly communication was evident. The total of published
research articles in all three journals was 116 in 2013 compared to 187
in 2017. This increase in publication was estimated at 61.20% with 6.77%
annual growth rate.
The publication types brought out the fact that the original
articles (62.15%) occupied the predominant place among the other types
of publication. The authorship pattern of the journals research revealed
that the majority of papers are multi-authored, which indicated the
research output of the authors is mainly collaborative. Through
collaboration, researchers share knowledge that bring in a mixture of
positive scientific ideas. However, the unified bylaws for faculty in
Saudi universities give more weight to single authored papers compared
to multi-authored papers. For example, one of the requirements to be
eligible for promotion from assistant professor to associate professor
is four published and/or accepted for publication units. A scholarly
work is to be counted as 'one unit' if it is single authored,
and 'half unit' if it has two authors. If the research was
conducted by more than two authors, it will be regarded as 'half
unit' for the first author and 'quarter unit' for each of
the others (KSAU-HS, 2018). The Ministry of Education in SA is
recommended to revise this particular bylaw to be in parallel with the
trends towards collaborative research, which is gaining currency
day-by-day.
5. Conclusions
The research activities in SA is in a growing path. The comparison
of bibliometric indicators of three Saudi medical journals revealed the
rising tendency of research publications and the high rate of
collaborative research. These journals contributed massive number of
research papers (n=827) for the period of 2013-2017. Although not all
the published articles in these three journals were carried out in SA,
such contribution provides a glowing image about Saudi scientific
activities in the global scenario. The unified bylaws for faculty in
Saudi universities should give more weight to multi-authored papers.
References
Al-Bishri, J. (2013). Evaluation of biomedical research in Saudi
Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 34(9), 954-959.
Alhaider, I., Ahmed, K. M., & Gupta, B. M. (2015).
Pharmaceutical research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A scientometric
analysis during 2001-2010. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 23(3), 215-222.
Baladi, Z. H., & Umedani, L. V. (2017). Pakistan Journal of
Medical Sciences: A bibliometric assessment 2001-2010. Pakistan journal
of medical sciences, 33(3), 714-719.
Haq, I., Al Fouzan, K. S., & Baladi, Z. (2017). Oncology
research outcome by King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health
Sciences, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A bibliometric appraisal.
International Journal of Library Science, 6(3), 52-57.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (2018).
Faculty bylaws. Retrieved from http://dqm.ksau-hs.edu.sa/?page id=15
Latif, R. (2015). Medical and biomedical research productivity from
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2008-2012). Journal of family &
community medicine, 22(1), 25.
Meo, S. A., Hassan, A., & Usmani, A. M. (2013). Research
progress and prospects of Saudi Arabia in global medical sciences.
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 17(24),
3265-3271.
Mohan, B. S., & Rajgoli, I. U. (2017). Mapping of scholarly
communication in publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia,
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, and Publications of
the Astronomical Society of the Pacific: A bibliometric approach.
Science & Technology Libraries, 36(4), 351-375.
Pritchard A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics.
Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Saquib, N., Zaghloul, M. S., Mazrou, A., & Saquib, J. (2017).
Cardiovascular disease research in Saudi Arabia: A bibliometric
analysis. Scientometrics, 112(1), 111-140.
Scimago Journal and Country Rank (2018). Saudi Arabia. Retrieved
from http://www.scimagoir.com/
Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Research collaboration in
Saudi Arabia 1980-2014: Bibliometric patterns and national policy to
foster research quantity and quality. Libri, 66(1), 13-29.
Ullah, S., Jan, S. U., Jan, T., Ahmad, H. N., Jan, M. Y., &
Rauf, M. A. (2016). Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of
Pakistan: Five years bibliometric analysis. Journal of the College of
Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 26(11), 920-923.
Ahmad A. Alanazi
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,
alanaziahm@ksau-hs.edu.sa
Zameer Baladi
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,
baladiz@ksau-hs.edu.sa
Ikram Ul Haq
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,
haqi@ksau-hs.edu.sa
Ahmad A. Alanazi, (1) Zameer Hussain Baladi, (2) Ikram Ul Haq (3)
(1.) Ahmad A. Alanazi, AuD, PhD. Assistant Professor, College of
Applied Medical Sciences King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health
Sciences Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Email: alanaziahm@ksau-hs.edu.sa
(2.) Zameer Hussain Baladi, DPA. MLIS. M.Phil. Librarian, College
of Applied Medical Sciences King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for
Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Email: baladiz@ksau-hs.edu.sa
(3.) Ikram Ul Haq, MLIS. Librarian, College of Dentistry King Saud
Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Email:
haqi@ksau-hs.edu.sa
Caption: Figure 2. Types of Publication in JIPH, SJMMS, and JSHA.
Table 1: Year, Volume and Issue-Wise Distribution of Articles in JIPH,
SJMMS, and JSHA.
No Year, Journal Issue Issue Issue Issue Issue
& Volume I II III IV V
1 2013 SJMMS V: 6 10 10
2 2014 SJMMS V: 7 10 11 19
3 2015 SJMMS V: 8 20 16 12
4 2016 SJMMS V: 9 10 13 17
5 2017 SJMMS V: 10 15 18 14
6 2013 JSHA V:25 8 8 8 7
7 2014 JSHA V:26 9 9 9 8
8 2015 JSHA V:27 10 10 11 10
9 2016 JSHA V:28 9 10 10 11
10 2017 JSHA V:29 11 12 12 11
11 2013 JIPH V: 1 8 11 13 10 11
12 2014 JIPH V: 2 10 12 11 13 10
13 2015 JIPH V: 3 11 12 13 10 14
14 2016 JIPH V: 4 15 9 19 20 19
15 2017 JIPH V: 5 17 16 15 14 30
173 177 183 114 84
(21%) (21.4%) (22.1%) (13.7%) (10.1%)
No Issue Total Article %
VI Published
1 20 2.42%
2 40 4.84%
3 48 5.80%
4 40 4.84%
5 47 5.68%
6 31 3.75%
7 35 4.23%
8 41 4.96%
9 40 4.84%
10 46 5.56%
11 12 65 7.86%
12 13 69 8.34%
13 16 76 9.19%
14 12 94 11.37%
15 43 135 16.32%
96 827 (12.92 articles per
(11.6%) issue)
Table 2. Types of publication and Numbers of Pages and References.
Publication Type SJMMS 2013-2017 JSHA 2013-2017
Total issues 14 Total issues 20
Original Articles 89 85
Review Articles 23 23
Short Communications 4 1
Case Reports 79 84
Short Reports 0 0
Total Articles 195 193
Pages 958 1244
Total References 4399 4569
Publication Type JIPH 2013-2017 Total %
Total issues 30
Original Articles 340 514 62.15%
Review Articles 36 82 9.92%
Short Communications 23 28 3.39%
Case Reports 10 173 20.92%
Short Reports 30 30 3.63%
Total Articles 439 827
Pages 3110 5312 6.4 pages use
per article
Total References 11809 20777 25.1 references
use per article
Table 3. Total Number of Authors in Published Papers in JIPH, SJMMS,
and JSHA.
Number of Authors SJMMS 2013-2017 JSHA 2013-2017
Total issues 14 Total issues 20
Total Authors 600 951
Number of Authors JIPH 2013-2017 Total %
Total issues 30
Total Authors 2257 3808 4.6 authors per article
Figure 1. Published research items in JIPH, SJMMS, and JSHA.
SJMMS 2013-2017 195 (23.5%)
JSHA 2013-2017 193 (23.3%)
JIPH 2013-2017 439 (53%)
Note: Table made from bar graph.
Figure 3. Authorship Pattern of JIPH, SJMMS, and JSHA.
Single Author 81
Double Author 103
Three Authors 140
Four Authors 164
Five Authors 103
Six Authors 89
Seven Authors 63
Eight Authors 31
Nine Authors 17
Ten & Above 36
Note: Table made from bar graph.
Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright
restrictions.
COPYRIGHT 2018 University of Idaho Library
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.