KEYWORDS ANALYSIS ON DENGUE DISEASE FROM 2005-2014: A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY.
Newton, Issac ; Mani, P. Gomathi
KEYWORDS ANALYSIS ON DENGUE DISEASE FROM 2005-2014: A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY.
Introduction
Scientometrics is the study of measuring and analyzing science,
technology and innovation. Major research issues embrace the dimension
of impact, reference sets of articles to explore the impact of journals
and institutes, considerate of scientific citations, mapping scientific
fields and the formation of indicators for use in policy and
organization contexts. In observe there is a important be related
between scientometrics and other scientific fields such as
bibliometrics, information science and science of science policy. Dengue
diseases also known as break bone fever, is a mosquito-borne tropic a
disease cause y the dengue virus.
Dengue diseases also known as break bone fever, is a mosquito-borne
tropic a disease caused y the dengue virus. Symptoms consist of fever,
headache, muscle and joint pains, and a quality skin rash that is
similar to measles. In a small quantity of cases, the disease develops
into the life-aggressive dengue hemorrhagic fever, resulting in
bleeding, low levels of blood platelets and blood plasma leakage, or
into dengue shock syndrome, where stress occurs. Treatment of acute
dengue is compassionate using either oral or intravenous rehydration for
mild or moderate disease, and intravenous fluids and blood transfusion
for extra severe cases. The number of cases of dengue fever has
increased dramatically since the 1960s, with between 50 and 528 million
people infected yearly. Early descriptions of the circumstance date from
1779, and its viral cause and transmission were understood by the early
20th century. Dengue has become a global problem since the Second World
War and is endemic in more than 110 countries. Apart from eliminating
the mosquitoes, work is ongoing on a vaccine, as well as medication
targeted directly at the virus.
Signs and symptoms
Typically, people contaminated with dengue virus are an indicative
(80%) or only have mild symptoms such as an unsophisticated fever.
Therefore, travelers frequent from widespread areas are improbable to
have dengue if fever or other symptoms start more than 14 days after
arriving home. Children repeatedly experience symptoms related to those
of the common cold and gastroenteritis (sickness and diarrhea) and have
a greater risk of severe complications, though initial symptoms are
generally unconcerned but contain high fever.
Review of Literature
Hang Wen and Yi Huang (2012) carried out a investigate on oxidative
stress publications published among 1991 and 2010 in journals of all the
focus categories of the Science citation index. Publication trends were
analyzed by the retrieved consequences in periodical type and language,
individuality of articles outputs, country, focus categories and
journals, and the incidence of title-words and keywords used. Over the
years, there was a significant growth in article outputs, with more
countries participating and collaborating. The seven major
industrialized countries (G7) published the majority of the world
articles while the USA contributed about one-third of the total. Chinese
and Indian outputs grew much faster than those of other countries in the
past five years. Oxidative stress research in food and ecological
associated fields increasingly became the conventional of the research.
An analysis of the title-words, author keywords and keywords plus
showed that antioxidants in human or rat cells were the hot topic in the
field. In addition, "reaction oxygen species",
"apoptosis", and "nitric-oxide" were major topics of
oxidative stress research recently.
Gupta, R., & Tiwari, R. (2014) conducted a study based on
quantitatively evaluate Indian dengue research output during the 10
years from 2003 to 2012, using Scopus international multidisciplinary
database. The study focused on global publication output, share, rank,
and citation impact of top 15 most productive nations, India's
publications output, growth, global publication share and research
impact, international collaborative papers share in national output and
the share of major international collaborative partner countries in
total India's international collaborative papers, contribution of
various sub-fields and distribution by population age groups,
productivity and citation impact of its leading Indian institutions and
authors and Indian contribution in most productive journals. Among the
top 15 most productive countries, India holds second position in dengue
fever research output, with global publication share of 10.22% during
2003-12. The average citation per paper scored by India was 3.27, the
least among the top 15 most productive countries during 2003-12.
India's share of international collaborative papers was 10.55%
during 2003-12, which increased from 9.12% during 2003-07 to 11.13%
during 2008-12. Present India's research efforts in dengue research
are low in view of the 50,222 cases of dengue in 2012 alone. The country
needs to increase its research output and also increase its research
impact substantially particularly through enhanced national and
international collaboration, besides evolving a national policy for
identification, monitoring and control of dengue cases and also evolving
a research strategy with sufficient funding commitment to solve this
growing national problem.
Sa'ed, H. Z. (2016) the focused emergence the of the dengue is
a significant emerging and reemerging infection worldwide as a quickly
growing and extensive public health problem, with diffusion occurring in
more than 128 countries in Asia, Americas, southeast Africa, western
Pacific, and eastern Mediterranean regions. The consistent search
advance based on the exploit of the keyword "dengue" in the
title, abstract and keyword field was used to get examine output related
to dengue at a global level. All data related to dengue were collected
from the past to December 31, 2015.A total of 19,581 dengue-related
documents identified in the Scopus database. The leading countries in
dengue research were the USA (4,709; 24.05 %), India (1,942; 9.92 %),
Brazil (1,530; 7.81 %), Thailand (1,260; 6.43 %), the UK (1,129; 5.77
%), and France (1,087; 5.55 %). Only 226 (1.16 % of the overall global
research effort in the dengue field) articles were published in the Arab
region. The total number of citations for all publications was 352,710,
with an average of 18.0 citations per publication. Furthermore, the
h-index for all extracted data related to dengue research was 186.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was the most productive country in the
Arab region with 102 documents representing 45.1 %. Furthermore, the
h-index for all extracted data related to dengue research was 27. The
USA was Arab's most main cooperative partner (46, 20.4 %), followed
by India (36, 15.9 %). It was concluded that the amount of literature
related to dengue research has considerably increased over the last
decade. This bibliometric investigation has confirmed the significant
role that the USA, India, Brazil, Thailand, the UK, and France
participate in dengue research. The Arab world formed fewer publications
correlated to dengue with lower eminence than further world countries.
Lalitha Kumari (2009) analyses the research output and impact in
Synthetic Organic Chemistry (SOC) during 1998-2004, applying
standardized scientometric indicators. Volume of research publications
and their citations presented as percentage world share is illustrative
of the trend pattern against time. Adopting relative indicator--Absolute
Citation Impact (ACI) and Relative Citation Impact (RCI), a cross
national assessment is attempted at three levels of aggregations global,
Asian and Indian. Based on this investigation, it is concluded that G7
nations, being leaders in respect of the volume of literature published,
and citations attracted are showing a decreasing trend over the years
probably due to shifting and diversification of their research efforts
to other emerging research fronts.
Bhardwaj, R. K. (2014) explored Dengue is a disease primarily
characterized by headache, eye pain, skin rash, debilitating muscle, and
sudden high fever. Presently, no vaccine is available to counter this
disease. The best antidote is disturbance strategies to limit the extent
of a virus. This paper is an attempt to make a scientometric assessment
of research on dengue during 2001-12. The data of this study is obtained
from Scopus (http://www.scopus.com) multidisciplinary database and
analyzed from different angles. The study reveals that there were 9618
publications within the period under study. During the period 2001-12
annual growth rate was 13.4 percent, compared to 14.31 percent in the
period 2001-2006, and 12.48 percent in 2007-2012. The USA is found to be
the leading country on dengue research. The USA has contributed 24.88
percent of world publications. Mahidol University, Thailand, is the
majority industrious organization which has contributed the highest
number of publications (353 papers; 6502 citations; h-index value 40).
Guzman, Maria Guadalupe from Instituto de Medicina Tropical Pedro Kouri,
was found to be the most dynamic author in the field of dengue research.
Dutt, B., Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2010) have analyzed of 2566
papers published during 1987 to 2008 and indexed by Science Citation
Index--Expanded indicate a gradual rise in the quantum of output. About
80% of the papers appeared in journals originating from the USA. The UK,
Netherlands, France, and Germany. Total output came from 74 countries of
which 17 countries contributed 87% of the total output. The highest
number of publications came from the USA followed by India. However, in
the later block (1998-2008) the proportion of the output of both USA as
well as India declined as compared to the first block (1987-1997). More
than half of the scientific output is concentrated among four
sub-disciplines of microbiology & virology, immunology &
vaccine. Epidemiology and entomology. Among the prolific institutions,
the publication output of institutions from the US and Taiwan had a
higher impact. Of all the papers published 17%, did not get any
citations. The incidence of High-Quality Papers, Citations per Paper
(CPP) and Relative Quality Index (RQI) were more than average for the
USA. The proportion of co-authored papers increased significantly in the
year 2008 as compared to 1987. The proportion or mega authored paper was
high for the Netherlands, Taiwan, China, Cuba, Brazil, France, and
Japan.
Objectives
The following are the important objectives of the study,
> To find out year-wise publication of articles
> To find out Document Type
> To find out the institution wise Records
> To find out the Authorship pattern
> To determine the degree of collaboration,
> To find out the Single and Multi Authorship pattern
> To find out most prolific authors, most productive institution
and-i author productivity
Methodology
The present study data were collected from the web of science core
collection database which is published by Thomson Reuters [WOS]. The
records on 'Dengue Disease' research output during 2005 - 2014
have taken for the analysis. The present study analysis for the
authorship pattern, countries, institutions, keywords in dengue disease.
Bradford's law of scattering has also been applied in this study.
The keywords investigation for dengue disease during the study period
was taken and 3517 words were retrieved for the present study. The
collected data from a web of science core collection database records of
analyzed through Histcite and calculated using excel sheet to find out
the result.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Table 1 analyses the yearly output brought out by the scientists on
dengue disease at world level from 2005 to 2014. From the below table,
we could clearly see that there is about 3517 total output brought out
by the scientists on dengue the year wise analyses indicate the
increasing trend. In the year the output measured is 131. It increased
to 691 in the year 2014. Yet there is a declaring trend is observed in
the year 2013 from the year 2005 to 2009. The output performance rate is
measured to below 10 percentages; still, from 2010 onwards the
performance is observed to more than 10 percentages. And the year 2014
is a progressive year. The increasing trend is noted from this year 2005
and the light output performance is noted in the year 2014. Yet there is
a declaring status in the output performance is observed in the year
2013 to which the reason is unknown. The study includes the data covered
in a web of science database from 2005 to 2014.
Table 3 lights on the language wise distribution of research output
given by dengue researcher. The overall strong period corers 11
different languages. The dengue scientists are spread over 11 different
language speakers. Among then 5 languages are observed. The majority of
the scientists prefer publishing their reserved output in English
language. It is routed to be about 3376. out of total output of 3517
language English occupies to be the top and it is calculated to 95.93
percentage. The next language that the dengue scientist prefer is
Spanish which is accounted to 51.
Table 4 explains the country wise distribution of publications
output on Dengue Disease. The total output observed in the study is 5505
during the short period. There are about dengue contras have collective
contributed 5505 research output on dengue disease. The analyses bring
out the fact that the USA is ranked to be the first and it has given the
productivity of 1219 records on Dengue research. The second rank is
occupied by BRAZIL which has brought out 430 publications on Dengue
Disease. While comparing the output of USA, Output of BRAZIL seems to be
one third of USA's Output. The third rank to the UK .It has
reflected with 316 publications output. FRANCE is the next order of rank
and it has shows 284 publications. India is ranked to the fifth in
order. The output of INDIA is accounted to 261. THAILAND is observed to
be sixth in rank order with 255 publishing. There are about 5 countries
observed with more than 100 publications on Dengue disease. The other
countries are noted with less than 100 publications .The table has
listed according to the output of countries up to 10 publications.
Number of countries has collectively brought out 219 research output on
Dengue Disease.
Table 4 shows year wise authorship pattern of the research output
on dengue disease. It indicates that out of the 216 contributions to
single authors. Year 2014 is highest number i.e-33, since the year 2005
has the lowest number i.e-8 contributions .Out of the 435 contributions
to two authors, Year 2014 is highest number i.e-79, since the year 2005
has the lowest number i.e-12 contributions. Out of the 435 contributions
to three authors, year 2014 is highest number i.e-94, since the year
2005 has the lowest number i.e-21 contributions. Out of the 370
contributions to four authors, Year 2014 is highest number i.e-64, since
the year 2005 has the lowest number i.e-15 contributions.
The table shows the details about the degree of collaboration which
indicate tend in single and multiple authorship during 2005 - 2014 as
shown in Table. The degree of collaboration ranges from 0.90 to 0.97 and
the average degree of collaboration is 0.94. The DC is calculated by
using the formula K. Subramaniyam, 1982. The formula is where
DC = Degree of Collaboration
NM = Number of Multi Authors
NS = Number of Single Authors
C = [N.sub.m]/[N.sub.m] + [N.sub.s]
C = 3301/3301 + 216 = 0.93
In the present study the value of DC is 0.93.
As the result, the degree of collaboration in the study Dengue
Disease is 9.36 which show the collaborations of multiple authors.
We observed the majority of the keywords DENGUE in 2038 research
output with TLCS-10794 and TGCS in-33761 which we got the first
position. The next keywords kindly concentrated by the World Scientists
on Dengue Disease in 959 records of "VIRUS" which is observed
with TLCS 4858 and TGCS in 18481 which we got second position, followed
by the "FEVER"462 records with TLCS-2131 and TGCS-6377 which
we got the third position.
Further, it was analyzed to find out the key journals in the field
of Dengue Disease which have brought out with more number of
publications made by the researchers. It was found that there were 840
journals Dengue Disease researchers got their articles published over a
period of study. There have been 239 papers published by a single PLOS
NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES has published; 0 TLCS, 3892 TGCS. It ranked
at first place of research output in the field of Dengue Disease. The
second position is taken by PLOS ONE which is accented to 183
publications of Dengue disease researchers in the Indian scientists
with; with 0 TLCS, 1504 TGCS. The journal of AMERICAN JOURNAL OF
TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 143 Publications, 886 TLCS and 2400 TGCS
are scaled and it stands in third position of the publication. JOURNAL
OF VIROLOGY has published 94; 1101 TLCS, 3287 TGCS, and it ranked in
fourth place. 'VACCINE' has published 62 with 341 TLCS, 1340
TGCS and it stands in fifth position.
Bradford's law of scattering
The aim of Bradford's law is to explain that a group of
journals could be arranged in an order of decreasing productivity and
this has revealed that journals which yield most productive articles
come first while the most unproductive tail last. According to this law
journals are to be grouped into a number of zones each producing similar
number of articles. However, the number of journals in each zone will
increase rapidly. Then the relationship among the zones is
l:a:[n.sup.2].
Bradford in his study analyzed articles in Dengue Disease. The
journals containing to that field in descending order of productivity
and divided that list into three 'Zones' each containing
roughly the same number of journals .Bradford observed that the number
of journals contributing articles to each zone increased by the
multiplications of about five. The distribution of journals in various
zones is as follows.
According to Bradford's law of distribution based on equation
1 and 2 the relationship between the zones is l:n:[n.sup.2], But the
relationship between the zones in the present study is contradictory in
each as 16:77:747 which does not fit to Bradford's distribution. It
is clear that core distribution of articles has been published by a very
few journals which means less than what Bradford formulated.
Conclusion
From the conclusion of this present study, the efficiency of the
author could be recognized. Therefore, the individual author may be
stimulated to distribute more number of contributions to enhance the
single author contributions. The atmosphere and infrastructure are also
very effective for the entire development of 'Dengue Disease'
research area. It should be required to necessitate, stimulate and
encourage researchers and scientists in this field of 'Dengue
Disease' to carry out research to recognize the impact of research
output. It is mandatory to recruit specific research institutions to
support research in the area on 'Dengue Disease' research in
the developing countries. The Universities and research institutions are
to be provided with more financial assistance in the form of research
grants to increase the quality of research.
References
(1.) Gupta, R., & Tiwari, R. (2014). Dengue research in India:
A scientometric analysis of publications, 2003-12. International Journal
of Medicine and Public Health, 4(1).
(2.) Sa'ed, H. Z. (2016). Dengue research: a bibliometric
analysis of worldwide and Arab publications during 1872-2015. Virology
journal, 13(1), 78.
(3.) Bhardwaj, R. K. (2014). Dengue research: a scientometric
mapping of world publications. SRELS J Inf Manag, 51(2), 77-86.
(4.) Dutt, B., Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2010). Scientometric
profile of global dengue research. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and
Information Management, 4(1), 81-91.
(5.) Poornima, A. et al. (2011) Mapping the Indian research
productivity of food science and technology: A scientometric analysis.
Food Biology, 1(1), 36-41. 61
(6.) Konur, Ozcan (2010). The scientometric evaluation of the
research on the algae and bioenergy. Applied Energy, 88(10), 3532-3540.
(7.) Lalitha Kumari, G. (2009). Synthetic Organic Chemistry
Research: Analysis by Scientometric Indicators. Scientometrics, 80 (3),
559-570.
(8.) Nicholas, David and Maureen Ritchie. Literature and
Bibliometrics London: Clive Bingley: 1978. (28-29).
(9.) Rahman, M., Rahman, K., Siddque, A. K., Shoma, S., Kamal, A.
H. M., Ali, K. S., & Breiman, R. F. (2002). First outbreak of dengue
hemorrhagic fever, Bangladesh. Emerging infectious diseases, 8(7), 738.
(10.) Halstead, S. B. (2013). Dengue: the syndromic basis to
pathogenesis research. Inutility of the 2009 WHO case definition. The
American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 88(2), 212-215.
(11.) Guha-Sapir, D.,& Schimmer, B. (2005). Dengue fever: new
paradigms for a changing epidemiology. Emerging themes in epidemiology,
2(1), 1.
(12.) Arencibia-Jorge, R., Corera-Alvarez, E.,
Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & de Moya-Anegon, F. (2016). The
scientific output of the emerging Cuban biopharmaceutical industry: a
scientometric approach. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1621-1636.
(13.) Garg, K. C., & Sharma, C. (2017). Bibliometrics of
Library and Information Science research in India during 2004-2015.
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 37(3), 221.
(14.) Kumar, K. (2014). A scientometric study of digital literacy
in online library information science and technology abstracts (LISTA).
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1-13.
(15.) Bala, M., & Singh, M. P. (2014). A Scientometric Study of
Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB). Library Philosophy and
Practice, 0_1.
(16.) Sangam, S. L., Arali, U. B., Patil, C. G., & Gani, S. R.
(2014). Research trends in genetics: scientometric profile of selected
Asian countries. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information
Technology, 34(3).
(17.) Narang, A., & Kumar, A. (2010). A bibliometric study of
Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. SRELS Journal of
Information Management, 47(1), 31-39.
(18.) Hang Wen and Yi Huang (2012) Trends and performance of
oxidative stress research from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics. 91,
pp.:51-63.
Issac Newton
Research Scholar, Department Of Library and Information Science,
Periyar University, Salem-11, issacnew25@gmail.com
Dr. P. Gomathi Mani
Assistant Professor, Department Of Library and Information Science,
Periyar University, Salem-11, gomathi148@gmail.com
Caption: Figure: 2 Language Wise of Articles
Table: 1 year wise publication of records
S.No Publication Year Records % TLCS TGCS
1 2005 131 3.72 1640 5733
2 2006 185 5.26 2227 6876
3 2007 208 5.91 2081 7152
4 2008 282 8.02 1765 7000
5 2009 323 9.18 1417 6533
6 2010 382 10.87 1352 7628
7 2011 414 11.77 1305 6190
8 2012 518 14.73 808 4996
9 2013 383 10.89 471 2293
10 2014 691 19.65 82 731
Total 3517 100 13148 55132
Table: 2 Language Wise of Articles
S.No Language Records % TLCS TGCS
1 English 3376 95.93 13010 54594
2 Spanish 51 1.45 14 106
3 Portuguese 39 1.11 33 156
4 French 29 0.82 88 249
5 German 14 0.4 0 14
6 Turkish 4 0.11 3 12
7 Polish 2 0.06 0 1
8 Czech 1 0.03 0 0
9 Dutch 1 0.03 0 0
10 Korean 1 0.03 0 0
11 Malay 1 0.03 0 0
Total 11 3517 100 13148 55132
Table: 3 Country wise Records (130 countries)
S.NO Country Records Cumulative TLCS TGCS
1 USA 1219 1219 6211 27146
2 Brazil 430 1649 948 4292
3 UK 316 1965 1569 6710
4 France 284 2249 1040 5567
5 India 261 2510 591 2159
6 Thailand 255 2765 1462 4613
7 Singapore 186 2951 866 3913
8 Australia 181 3132 615 3404
9 Peoples R China 153 3285 248 1678
10 Germany 144 3429 770 2861
11 Taiwan 124 3553 702 2241
12 Japan 97 3650 349 1242
13 Malaysia 97 3747 279 1105
14 Vietnam 97 3844 737 2712
15 Switzerland 86 3930 377 2633
16 Netherlands 84 4014 199 1326
17 Canada 83 4097 308 2081
18 Mexico 79 4176 118 1066
19 Cuba 68 4244 392 1468
20 Italy 68 4312 134 765
21 Colombia 66 4378 83 463
22 Spain 53 4431 88 649
23 South Korea 52 4483 427 1570
24 Indonesia 50 4533 152 542
25 Pakistan 46 4579 41 158
26 Sri Lanka 46 4625 108 317
27 Venezuela 46 4671 240 696
28 Sweden 43 4714 108 630
29 Argentina 41 4755 82 425
30 Peru 31 4786 44 436
31 Portugal 30 4816 46 261
32 Belgium 29 4845 171 612
33 Philippines 29 4874 90 393
34 Nicaragua 27 4901 235 683
35 Cambodia 25 4926 24 637
36 South Africa 23 4949 209 772
37 Reunion 22 4971 64 375
38 French Guiana 21 4992 73 295
39 Saudi Arabia 21 5013 17 135
40 Costa Rica 19 5032 27 164
41 Kenya 19 5051 34 177
42 Austria 18 5069 30 203
43 Trinidad & Tobago 18 5087 36 140
44 Israel 17 5104 100 414
s45 Turkey 14 5118 11 80
46 Fr Polynesia 13 5131 29 115
47 Martinique 13 5144 52 139
48 Ecuador 12 5156 10 129
49 Gabon 12 5168 20 171
50 Egypt 11 5179 9 82
51 New Zealand 11 5190 14 127
52 Denmark 10 5200 47 142
53 Nepal 10 5210 6 39
54 Norway 10 5220 8 139
55 Senegal 10 5230 30 223
Other 75 275 5505 1429 4660
Countries
TOTAL Total (130) 5505 21636 96175
Countries
Table: 4 Year Wise Analysis of Authorship Pattern
Years Single Two Three Four Five More Total
Author Author Author Author Author than
five
2005 8 12 21 15 15 63 134
2006 13 25 23 16 24 83 184
2007 15 23 25 34 17 95 209
2008 29 46 46 19 23 120 283
2009 27 43 35 40 31 147 323
2010 23 47 45 42 39 185 381
2011 26 57 36 45 46 203 413
2012 31 58 49 49 64 266 517
2013 11 45 61 46 47 172 382
2014 33 79 94 64 71 350 691
TOTAL 216 435 435 370 377 1684 3517
Table: 5 Analysis of Degree of Collaboration
Years Single Multiple Total Degree
Author Author Authors of
(NS) (NM) (NS+NM) Collaboration
2005 8 126 134 0.94
2006 13 171 184 0.93
2007 15 194 209 0.93
2008 29 254 283 0.90
2009 27 296 323 0.92
2010 23 358 381 0.94
2011 26 387 413 0.94
2012 31 486 517 0.94
2013 11 371 382 0.97
2014 33 658 691 0.95
Total 216 3301 3517 0.93
Table: 6 Analysis of keywords on Top 20 Only (5493)
S.No Word Records TLCS TGCS
1 DENGUE 2038 10794 33761
2 VIRUS 959 4858 18481
3 FEVER 462 2131 6377
4 INFECTION 448 2074 7410
5 AEDES 368 855 5075
6 DISEASE 327 1395 5713
7 AEGYPTI 280 688 4041
8 VECTOR 225 557 2867
9 CONTROL 190 573 3085
10 HUMAN 187 561 2684
11 MOSQUITO 180 372 2626
12 DISEASES 167 215 2392
13 INFECTIONS 156 716 2484
14 VIRAL 154 642 2548
15 PATIENTS 149 552 1754
16 PROTEIN 149 648 2750
17 HEMORRHAGIC 139 994 2517
18 CELLS 138 996 2755
19 DETECTION 131 340 1559
20 CHIKUNGUNYA 129 474 2497
Table: 7 Analysis of Ranking of Journals (840)
S.No Journal Records Cumulative
1 PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL 239 239
DISEASES
2 PLOS ONE 183 422
3 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF 143 565
TROPICAL MEDICINE AND
HYGIENE
4 JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY 94 659
5 VACCINE 62 721
6 JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES 52 773
7 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY 45 818
8 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF 42 860
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
9 TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL 42 902
SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE
AND HYGIENE
10 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL 41 943
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
11 TROPICAL MEDICINE & 40 983
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
12 VIROLOGY JOURNAL 39 1022
13 VIROLOGY 37 1059
14 ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH 36 1095
15 EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES 34 1129
16 PARASITES & VECTORS 34 1163
17 BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES 33 1196
18 MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO 32 1228
OSWALDO CRUZ
19 PLOS PATHOGENS 32 1260
20 JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY 31 1291
21 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL 31 1322
ENTOMOLOGY
22 JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL 29 1351
METHODS
23 ACTA TROPICA 27 1378
24 CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA 27 1405
25 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH 27 1432
26 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY 25 1457
27 REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE 25 1482
BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA
TROPICAL
28 VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC 25 1507
DISEASES
29 SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF 24 1531
TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PUBLIC
HEALTH
30 INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL 23 1554
RESEARCH
31 JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 23 1577
32 JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE 23 1600
33 INFECTION GENETICS AND 22 1622
EVOLUTION
34 BMC PUBLIC HEALTH 21 1643
35 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION 20 1663
36 VIRUS RESEARCH 20 1683
37 ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY 19 1702
38 BIOMEDICA 19 1721
39 JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN 19 1740
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
40 CLINICAL AND VACCINE 18 1758
IMMUNOLOGY
41 MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES 18 1776
42 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL 16 1792
MICROBIOLOGY
43 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN 16 1808
MOSQUITO CONTROL
ASSOCIATION
44 FUTURE VIROLOGY 15 1823
45 VIRUSES-BASEL 15 1838
46 CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS 14 1852
DISEASES
47 MICROBES AND INFECTION 14 1866
48 HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY 13 1879
49 JOURNAL OF VECTOR BORNE DISEASES 13 1892
50 TRAVEL MEDICINE AND 13 1905
INFECTIOUS DISEASE
51 ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND 12 1917
CHEMOTHERAPY
52 FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND 12 1929
MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
53 JOURNAL OF VECTOR ECOLOGY 12 1941
54 LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 12 1953
55 TROPICAL BIOMEDICINE 12 1965
56 CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES 11 1976
57 HUMAN VACCINES 11 1987
58 JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY 11 1998
59 REVISTA DO INSTITUTO DE 11 2009
MEDICINA TROPICAL DE SAO
PAULO
60 VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY 11 2020
61 BMC GENOMICS 10 2030
62 EUROSURVEILLANCE 10 2040
63 8 journals 9 72 2112
64 10 journals 8 80 2192
65 12 journals 7 84 2276
66 18 journals 6 108 2384
67 18 journals 5 90 2474
68 28 journals 4 112 2586
69 54 journals 3 162 2748
70 140 journals 2 280 3028
71 489 journals 1 489 3517
72 Total journals 3517
S.No TLCS TGCS
1 0 3892
2 0 1504
3 886 2400
4 1101 3287
5 341 1340
6 706 1465
7 204 511
8 114 306
9 146 558
10 574 1991
11 218 609
12 0 442
13 266 787
14 237 1015
15 363 1149
16 0 119
17 0 388
18 70 339
19 0 1048
20 188 647
21 51 353
22 88 390
23 79 258
24 86 239
25 43 236
26 86 295
27 35 150
28 80 374
29 10 59
30 97 224
31 342 794
32 63 315
33 59 252
34 0 190
35 94 289
36 25 203
37 52 162
38 3 29
39 26 64
40 118 307
41 107 256
42 153 513
43 18 134
44 15 61
45 51 144
46 184 434
47 64 143
48 70 192
49 12 68
50 6 45
51 36 264
52 151 261
53 20 85
54 143 663
55 8 21
56 105 414
57 63 191
58 48 108
59 9 67
60 62 165
61 0 121
62 0 178
63 518 1751
64 807 2693
65 377 2174
66 280 1395
67 118 713
68 354 1115
69 704 2549
70 784 3564
71 1073 11012
72 13191 60474
Table 7.1 Zone wise analysis of Bradford's Law
Zones Number of Journals Number of Records
1 16 1163
2 77 1113
3 747 1241
Total 840 3517
Figure: 1 year wise publication of records
2005 131
2006 185
2007 208
2008 282
2009 323
2010 382
2011 414
2012 518
2013 383
2014 691
Note: Table made from bar graph.
Figure: 3 Year Wise Analysis of Authorship Pattern
Total More then Five Four Three Two Single Years
five Author Author Author
1
2
3
4 134
5 184
6 209
7 283
8 323
9 381
10 413
11 517
12 382
13 3517 691
14 0
15 0
Note: Table made from line graph.
Please Note: Illustration(s) are not available due to copyright
restrictions.
COPYRIGHT 2018 University of Idaho Library
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.