Feet of the Messenger a Conversation with H.C. Palmer.
McGuire, Thomas G.
Feet of the Messenger a Conversation with H.C. Palmer.
H.C. Palmer grew up in Chanute, Kansas and finished high school in
Atchison. He was an all-state athlete in both football and basketball.
He went on to play football at the University of Kansas, where he was a
starter during his junior and senior year. He attended medical school at
the University of Kansas Medical School. Following his first year of
residency in internal medicine, he was drafted, along with 1500 other
American doctors and eventually served in Vietnam as a battalion
surgeon. During his medical career, H.C. was team physician for Harding
College, a member of the NAIA Medical Aspects of Sports Committee, Team
Physician for the 1973 USA All-Star Basketball team touring the
People's Republic of China, Chief
Medical Officer for the USA team at the 1979 World University Games
in Mexico City, and Team physician for the San Diego Clippers from
1982-85 when the Clippers moved their franchise to Los Angeles. A person
of many interests, H.C. raised registered Polled Hereford Cattle for 12
years. In 1981 the ranch's pen of three yearling bulls won First
Place at the National Western Stock Show in Denver. He also held a
private pilot's license and logged over 550 hours before he left
Liberal, Kansas to return, as he says, to civilization. Retired from
medicine now for five years, he has worked with veterans in the Kansas
City area, helping them write to tell their stories. H.C.'s poems
have appeared in many literary journals and the national on-line
journal, Poetry Daily. He is an assistant poetry editor for Narrative
Magazine. His first collection, Feet of the Messenger, was recently
published by BkMk Press and the University of Missouri, Kansas City.
H.C. and his wife Valerie live in the suburbs of Kansas City.
Interviewer: Thanks for sitting down with WLA. I'd like to
begin by asking how you got your start as a war poet. You've been
writing poetry for about a decade I understand, but you came back from
the Vietnam War in 1966. What inspired you to start writing verse about
that conflict after all those years?
H.C. Palmer: As I say in my book's Acknowledgements, the
appearance of a Vietnam veteran in a fly fishing story I was writing in
the late 1990's surprised me. I'd put the war away, from the
day my flight landed at Travis Air Force Base outside San Francisco. The
only time I talked about it, or listened to another veteran talk about
it was when I was on a trip to spend time with my friend who was
in-country when I was. He was a couple hundred miles away, a doctor at a
C-team in the 5th Special Forces. When we were together, I listened more
than talked. He is the most decorated physician from the war. The
stories he told were unbelievable. He was close to death many times. In
my book of poems, he is "My friend, Captain Lanny Hunter," I
was back at Division headquarters, just 13 miles from Saigon the last
part of my tour. At the time, we could move around in country once a
month or so. We were able to spend some time together--you could say, on
short R and R's in Saigon and Pleiku. My friend is a terrific
writer, and six or seven years after coming home, he had a novel
published, Living Dogs and Dead Lions simultaneously, by very
prestigious presses, one in New York and the other in Great Britain.
Later, he wrote and published a wonderful memoir, My Soul to Keep. When
I told my friend about the fly fishing story, he challenged me to
continue writing. That was thirty-five years after coming home. If it
weren't for him, I doubt that I would have ever attempted writing a
poem.
Before you turned to poetry, you wrote a good number of short
stories, many of them about vets and fly fishing. Can you tell us a bit
about those stories and how writing them has informed your poetry?
There are three or four stories about the Kansas plains and life
there and just as many fly fishing or hunting stories that include a
Vietnam veteran character who is pissed-off and expresses that emotion
by attacking what, in his childhood environment, was his place, but
while he was away, there was destruction of at least a part of that
place by what plutocrats and corporations consider
"progress."
Are you still writing fiction?
I still dabble at fiction, but mostly I've gone back through my
stories to steal scenes and narrative as the backbone for many of my
poems. So the fiction has more than informed my poems. Stolen and
condensed, my fiction has become my poems.
Given your experience as a fiction writer, it's not surprising
that you have terrific command of the narrative poem and prose poem
form, but you're no slouch when it comes to a number of other verse
forms. Your collection has impressive formal range; for example, it
contains several remarkable lyric poems. "Bird-Hunting The Tall
Grass" comes quickly to mind in this regard. What kinds of
imaginative opportunities or challenges did you discover as you began
venturing beyond the pale of narrative?
"Bird-Hunting The Tall Grass" was my first published poem.
It came to me from a day of hunting quail when, on a covey rise, I shot
a bird that was very close, and she was so blown apart I didn't
keep her because there was no breast meat left. My dog found the two
other birds down, and after I took them from her, I couldn't get
the sticky feathers and blood of the first little bird from my hands. I
vividly remember, when I washed those body juices and feathers away and
my hands came out of the spring creek shining clean, I thought of the
war and the times we couldn't wash the fabric and debris and body
fluids from our hands. That bird hunt was in 2007 and appeared in The
Flint Hills Review, a wonderful college press at Emporia State
University, at the eastern gateway to the Flint Hills. I never
considered if it was a lyric poem or not, but it seemed the best way to
construct it. I'm pretty much an uneducated poet when it comes to
credentials. I'd been reading poetry several years before that, and
I had been trying to imitate, as best I could, several poets. Among
them: B.H. Fairchild, Gary Snyder, Jim Harrison, Mary Oliver, and Ted
Kooser. I was trying to get a feel for their work--especially
rhythm--and then sound. I don't care much for poems that, when read
aloud, don't dance and sing. I like poetry that means something,
that might lead the reader to consider something she or he has never
considered before.
Over the past decade, I've taught a few writing warrior
workshops for veterans and creative writing seminars for active duty
personnel. In these encounters, I've always been struck by what
health care professionals (combat nurses, medics, docs, psychologists)
who've served in theater bring to the table. Very often military
health care personnel are incredibly resilient even as they carry deep
wounds from repeated exposure to trauma. These folks are frequently some
of the best writers in the workshop. I have deep respect for combat
medical personnel and what they do, but it seems their experience and
stories of war are not told enough or if they get told, they're
underappreciated. What's your sense of this?
The resilience of doctors and nurses and psychologists and
psychiatrists (Bill Nash comes to mind) is something I'm thinking
about myself. How could I have possibly tried to reconstruct the face of
my southern California medic (in "Five Notes From War") if I
hadn't prepared, perhaps 50 corpses, for autopsy, in my job as a
"diener" (morgue attendant) that I undertook to make some
extra bucks while I was a medical student? My job as a diener required,
among other skills, the ability to remove an intact brain from the skull
of the dead patient without making it impossible for an undertaker to
restore some version of normality. In fact, with my medic, the process
started rather nonchalantly, and when I realized I was singing Beach Boy
songs, a terrible wave of guilt came over me. At that moment, I hated
me, the war of course, and especially our government and generals, who I
knew damn well had been lying to us. So, I'd say, if we have
resilience, it's because we've all done this kind of thing
before ... we all know when people are dead, there really is no one
"in there." But, the horrors of war, right there in your own
hands, kids dying and looking in your eyes as you work on them, is not
something I (we) can ever forget. It's haunting. Forever.
I can't think of many standout voices in war literature who
speak from the healer's or medical professional's perspective.
Vera Brittain and Joan Furey quickly come to my mind as exceptional
voices, but what other writers' voices from the military medical
world should we become familiar with?
Well, although he was never a soldier, I'd have to start with
Jonathan Shay. I read Achilles in Vietnam when it came out in 1994, and
it changed my life. My copy of that wonderful book is dog-eared,
underlined, and worn. His book and Victor Frankl's work have been
very important to me. Rightly so, the medical emphasis lately has been
on moral injury and veteran suicide, and before that, PTSD. Dr. Bill
Nash is an expert on moral injury. Dr. Shay coined the term. Bryan
Doerries' work with the classic Greek war literature is
exponentially healing. Of course Shay and Doerries are not veterans, but
a book that comes to mind right off, is by a Special Forces Lieutenant
Colonel who worked in Iraq as an interrogator. He was the only American
in a cadre of several Iraqis and Kurds and his job was to make certain
there was no physical "torture." The author is LTC Bill
Edmonds. His book is god is not here, from Pegasus.
How do you account for the privileging of the
"hunter's" voice in war literature over the
"healer's" voice?
The 99%'ers don't want to know anything that's really
disturbing, but they are used to TV-portrayed violence, which of course,
has no personal meaning. And, beyond the KIA casualties, unless the dead
are family members or friends, they have no interest in the
psychological damage of war. The DoD has some interest, but to help our
guys and gals heal, or at least, as one of my Muslim friends once told
me, "Learn to negotiate their brokenness," would be a
difficult task. It would also be so expensive and labor intensive, it
will probably never happen. Once a soldier goes through boot camp, his
psyche has changed. Boot camp begins by sucking out a recruit's
soul and replacing it with a discipline to do the unthinkable, to
dehumanize and kill quickly and efficiently and at the same time be
completely loyal to his/her squad or platoon. (If we did not teach this,
we could not possibly compete in combat or win a war.) Here's the
problem, and you know as well as I. Our combat soldiers are never
prepared to return to civilian life. Usually a couple of days after
serving in a war zone they are shipped home, and if they're not in
a regular/active unit, returned to civilian life, home life, etc. There
is no debriefing, no de-boot-camping and just as egregiously, their
families are expected to make adjustments necessary to accommodate. This
just doesn't work.
Contrast to Doerries' and the Greeks' "Citizen
Soldiers," I think those epic plays he's re-written are all
about healing. You remember he says the Greek theaters were in close
proximity to the hospitals so the injured "warriors," if you
will, could come watch and participate. I really like the idea of
citizen soldiers. Right now, Israel has its citizen soldiers and their
incidence of psychological problems following combat are much less than
ours.
Also, I'm a big believer in the notion that
"betrayal" is the primary cause for psychological war
injuries, especially, moral injury. That betrayal can come from a
government, or a general or field grade officer or even oneself when,
for example, he or she takes on the responsibility, guilt, and
especially shame, that comes from losing a buddy in combat--survivor
guilt.
In your Acknowledgements you mention one of your medical school
professors, Dr. Delp, had seen action at the Battle of the Bulge. Upon
your return from Vietnam, he reached out to ask how you were doing. Can
I ask you to share your response to Dr. Delp's question? I'm
also curious how that encounter has informed your approach to writing
and how you interact with veterans.
My response to Dr. Delp's question was just as I said in the
book: "I'm just fine." I'd made an unconscious
choice to never think about the war again. Now that you ask, I think my
thoughts were focused on returning to the residency and I certainly was
tired of the war. Sometimes I would watch the news to see what was going
on around Da Nang, because Billy (who appears on page 17 in the
collection) was still there, and we were very close as kids growing up.
Dr. Delp never asked me again, although I'm certain he was
prompting me. When I was on his service, we had morning talks in his
office, before he came to the ward to make rounds, talks to update him
on the night reports. Occasionally, he would ask something like,
"Good to be home?" or "Everything going
satisfactorily?" But he never asked me direct questions about the
war. He was a stoic guy, my idol, the best, smartest, most
'artful' doctor I ever met. I sometimes wonder now, if he
needed to talk as much as I did. I may have let him down.
Can war poetry help our species wise up about what it means to go to
war? Full disclosure here: This is a thorny question for me because, on
one hand, I've invested much of my adult life writing about the
problem of violence and the literature of war, but I also realize that
very little has changed since the Iliad was composed nearly three
millennia ago--since Homer's time, we as a species seem to have
learned little from the "lessons" of the true war poems. How
do you see these matters?
Was it Auden who said, "Poetry makes nothing happen"? My
great concern now is that many of my friends are not watching the
Burns/Novick Vietnam series. And that it's not being taught in our
schools. Lynn Novick told me in a Q & A session a week ago that they
will have a curriculum for "middle school and up." My neighbor
girl, who is a senior in a very prestigious high school in western
Kansas City, Kansas, answered, when I asked her the dates of the
American War in Vietnam, "Somewhere, either right before or after
World War I."
I've long advocated for war literature being required reading
for high schoolers. How can a democracy function without its citizens
knowing something about the cost and consequences of war? A good dose of
war lit would no doubt give your neighbor something to consider--a
subject that she's probably not considered much. But your neighbor
is not unusual. Young cadets in my classes are often unaware of how long
our nation has continuously been at war or how insidiously the aftermath
of war spiders through our lives and society.
I told the neighbor girl to check out the dates of the Vietnam War,
then, a couple of days ago, I asked her again and she said, "After
World War I, right?" "That is correct," I said.
I appreciate your collection because it's keenly aware how war
ripples and bleeds into our culture and individual lives, in so many and
often intangible ways. It's possible perhaps to argue that every
poem in your new book is somehow haunted by war, and yet there are
several poems--very fine poems--that on the surface seem to have nothing
to do with war. The way you toggle back and forth so deftly between the
experience of war and quotidian experiences that may seem to have
nothing to do with the realm of armed conflict reminds me of one the
greatest war stories of all time, "Big Two-Hearted River."
Hemingway described that tale this way: "It was a story that was
all about coming back from the war, but there was no mention of war in
it." Were you aiming for a similar effect as you crafted your
collection and included the non-war poems?
I never considered Hemingway's "Big Two-Hearted
River" as I was writing the poems that refer to fish or fishing,
but I won't deny, I've read that story many times. I know of
its origin and, subconsciously, its presence is there. When I started
writing poems, I never considered they might work as an integrated
collection. What I suppose came out then, is a kind of connection by
contrast, or inference, that of finding beauty in most things, even war,
and then, what I must have done, unconsciously, to offset the horrors of
war with the beauty of place and maybe, one might say, a kind of healing
that comes from that. I was not--in these years that I've hammered
these poems into something I hope resembles "craft"--motivated
to have some semblance of unity, or interwovenness. If that has
happened, it came from inside my head and heart without forethought. I
guess I could say that I was surprised at what came out of me, but the
war, and my contempt for war, is never far from my mind.
One striking example of a piece from your collection that makes no
apparent mention of war is your poem "Ode to the Rio Grande
Cutthroat," a piece that at first glance seems to be simply about
the tenacity of the species Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis and its
ability to outface and outlast mankind's kingdoms and
civilizations. And yet that trout poem pulses with the drumbeat of war
left over from several other nearby poems where you deftly fuse the
subjects of fishing and war. Can you say something about the
angler's angle in your writing?
You know, this poem came to me, first, from having fished for this
beautiful subspecies of cutthroat, and then, from some research
resulting in my concern for this specific environment where the Rio
Grande cutthroat has always lived. I very much like Wendell Berry's
notion that destruction of our environment is driven by disrespect and
therefore, desecration of place, or places ... and that desecration is
most successfully accomplished by what is now the humanization of
capitalism and its excessive greed and, therefore, exponential profits
that come from war. Now, there has been no war, with the kind of
destruction we see in modern wars, in New Mexico's Rio Grande
Valley, or Montana's Madison Valley. But the damaging of habitat by
careless farmers and ranchers, or more especially mining and timber
companies, can be equally destructive. It's just on a smaller scale
and it takes longer to desecrate, but the damage is done. So, there is a
war here, and it's not over.
Absolutely. But for all the damage we've done to our
watersheds, we sometimes succeed in recuperating the wreckage. I'm
thinking specifically of the restoration of the Arkansas River here in
my backyard. At any rate, I admire your fishing poems. They remind me of
that great long line of fly fishing poems written by the likes of W.B.
Yeats, Seamus Heaney, and others. For you, what is it about fly fishing
that helps you figure the intricacies of creative process and craft?
Sometimes I imagine writing poetry is like fly fishing--with words
and lines. I cast a line out, let it float with the current, then strip
it back in. I'll cast again and again above the fish's rise to
place a fly in the right crease so the current moves it to the fish.
It's the ultimate presentation that is difficult for me--easier on
the stream than on paper.
Can we return to Wendell Berry for a moment? If he is correct in
linking desecration of place to the widespread environmental destruction
plaguing our planet, how would you define the essence of a healthy or
generative sense of place--a respectful sense of place that would serve
to counter and eventually reverse environmental damage?
I believe if one has not found their place in childhood, they are
operating at a psychological and spiritual disadvantage from which they
never recover. Wendell Berry wrote that his growth and effort to become
a poet had "everything to do with discovering where one is in
relation to one's place (native or chosen), to its natural and
human neighborhood, to its mystery and sanctity ..." I believe this
to be true for all of us who practice the art of our work or calling.
Without relationship to place, we are not fully creative or
connected.
How can we foster this sort of relationship--a more reverent,
non-violent attitude toward place?
I'm a real believer that unless children are taught about
special places, they will never be able to recover from that loss--never
develop that deep connection--never even know they've lost
something. Visiting the Grand Canyon, or the Flint Hills, as an adult
just won't get it done. I return to the Flint Hills as often as I
can, and I usually take one of my grandchildren with me. I tell them
stories and teach them about the environment. I'd emphasize the
importance of storytelling. My summers at Camp Wood were made richer by
storytelling. I am convinced that the telling of stories is vital to
place.
Teach the children. Your poetry is obviously grounded in a profound
respect for the Flint Hills and Kansas prairies--a kind of deep ecology
sense of place reminiscent of Gary Snyder. But your approach to place
also reminds me of Mary Oliver's work where she explores a sense of
place that is bound up with human relationships, especially familial
ties (including the writers she considers family, like Whitman).
I'm interested whether it was some parent or uncle who schooled you
in the importance of place. Or was it on your own that you discovered
the importance of cultivating one's own good place (what Hemingway
called querencia)?
At a workshop in Vermont in the mid-90s, Stephen Bodio taught me
about querencia, that place in the bull ring where the bull feels as
safe as he possibly could. I don't believe there were any
querencias in Vietnam. My discovery of place began when my father drove
me into the Flint Hills to Camp Wood near Elmdale. For two weeks in
1944, I roamed one section in the deep-rooted, tall grass prairie that
knits together the top layer of a 250-million-year-old limestone
deposit. At Camp Wood, I learned to identify and name plants, animals
and rock formations. Things like sideoats grama grass, Jerusalem
artichoke, shagbark hickory, scarlet tanagers, five-lined skinks,
massassaugas, chert and that Permian limestone. I learned I was
connected to all of them. I learned I could create by writing or
painting or braiding a lanyard or chipping flint rock carefully, to
craft a tool or forcefully make fire. I discovered my consciousness and
connectivity with the natural world at Camp Wood. It was inevitable the
Flint Hills would become my place. These camping expeditions were during
World War II, so I had a sense that where I camped was something totally
different than where some of my high school athlete-idols were camping,
like in the forests of France or under blasted palm trees somewhere in
the Pacific. I relished those times and still have vivid memories of
being there.
You say there were no querencias in Vietnam, but in some of your
writing you've discussed how your sense of the Flint Hills once
converged with memories of Vietnam. Can you talk about that convergence
please?
Maybe I can answer this question by referencing something you may
know about from your study of Irish literature and culture, the notion
of "thin place." Presence in a thin place is a Celtic notion.
It does not necessarily happen in our place, but is, for at least a
time, where we are close to something more--where we touch the certainty
of Being. I sensed momentary thin places when I was a Battalion Surgeon
in Vietnam, then after the war and over the past 45 years at unexpected
moments in various surroundings but most of the time, here in the Flint
Hills.
A few years ago, I had a "thin place" experience that
brought together the Flint Hills and my time in Vietnam. Jane Koger
invited me to walk through a forty-acre parcel of her native grass. It
was in a wide creek bottom and until twenty years before had been a
soybean field. After harvesting her last crop of beans, she decided to
"let it go back"--not work the soil in any fashion--to see
what would happen. The first few seasons, weeds like cocklebur and
yellow top covered the field. But she was patient and sure enough,
native grasses re-established and eventually grew to natural heights. We
walked through grass almost two feet over my head--big bluestem eight
feet tall, Indian grass, little bluestem and switchgrass up to my
shoulders and on slightly elevated mounds, blue and sideoats grama grass
above my knees. Smaller, less watered growths of buffalo grass were so
lush I felt as if I was stepping on a giant sponge.
I was surrounded by grass as tall as the elephant grass in Vietnam.
The wind was bending the long stalks then letting them go, much like the
wash from Huey choppers flying in and out of a landing zone. For a
moment, I sensed I was back at war. But there were no rotor chops, no
sounds from weapons and no men shouting orders or screaming. Without
thinking to do so, I had focused on the quiet sound of wind brushing
seed heads and leaves together and against my shoulders and for a time,
I was in a thin place.
No one can coerce or conjure another into a thin place. But every
June for the last six years, because of the talents of many "Flint
Hillers," whatever barrier may exist is made more permeable by a
celebration of Art and Being called Symphony in the Flint Hills.
I keep hearing about Symphony in the Flint Hills. My Kansas friends
tell me the Kansas City Symphony moves to a big pasture in the Flint
Hills for a twohour concert in the prairie that ends at sunset. Seven
thousand folks in the long grass listening to Aaron Copland's
"An Outdoor Overture." That's remarkable. Can you explain
how you and other organizers and volunteers manage to pull this thing
off?
How do they do it? It starts with imagination and people taking
charge. They write and draw the dream on pieces of paper. They enlist
fellow creators--designers, architects, entrepreneurs, builders, poets,
writers, landscape artists, country and classical musicians, cowhands,
ranchers, prairie sages, chefs and other talented volunteers. They
create an ephemeral city with streets of grass where buildings made of
canvas border Main Street: classrooms, performance halls, cafes, art
galleries, shops and information booths. They design a symphony hall for
a special orchestra in a venue that is perhaps better than any other.
Because they are like-minded and work in their natural neighborhood,
they affirm the mystery and sanctity of place. Because they are artists,
they carve holes into thin places.
Prairie restores, like the sod we trample that year or Jane's
40-acre soybean field in a creek bottom. People create. We make art and
do it authentically from our place and, if given the gift, inexplicably
from a thin place where we may touch the finger of Being. Symphony in
the Flint Hills draws us not only to the possibility, but also to the
authenticity of place and thin places. And because art compels us to
share, we invite our children, our grandchildren and friends. We pass it
on.
I have the sense that you have similar designs in your poetry and
work with veterans. It seems to me you understand more than most what
healing the heartland is all about and what it takes to do so. Moral
injury may strike, but the soul restores.
Well, I hope we are learning. More information about how to deal
with the terrible trauma of moral injury and veteran suicide is
appearing in the literature every day. I believe asking veterans to
write poetry and stories about trauma experienced in war are, at the
least, revealing, and at best healing. We know reading war literature is
very helpful, as the work of Bryan Doerries has demonstrated. The trauma
won't go away, but as my Muslim friend, Dr. Amir Hussain, so wisely
said, telling our stories helps us negotiate the trauma, and that gives
us hope. Without hope, there is nothing. And I hope all of us, the war
poets and writers, are thinking about these things as we write.
**********
THOMAS G. MCGUIRE has taught war literature and Irish literature at
the United States Air Force Academy for over a decade. A poet, scholar,
and translator, he is currently completing a monograph entitled Violence
and the Translator's Art: Seamus Heaney's Irish
Transformations as well as a collection of creative non-fiction essays
entitled Querencias: Places & Spaces of Refuge. He also serves as
WLA Poetry Editor.
COPYRIGHT 2017 U.S. Air Force Academy, Department of English
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.