Spinning presidential yarns: Greenberg, David. The Republic of Spin: An Inside History of the American Presidency (2016) New York: W.W. Norton & Company, $ 18.95, 540 pages.
Burnett, Chris
Spinning presidential yarns: Greenberg, David. The Republic of Spin: An Inside History of the American Presidency (2016) New York: W.W. Norton & Company, $ 18.95, 540 pages.
In The Republic of Spin, historian David Greenberg provides the
reader with a comprehensive summary and analysis of the development of
public relations techniques used by U.S. presidents since the turn of
the 20th century. Today it is impossible to imagine a world where
presidents had no one on their White House staffs assigned to deal with
the media or go over the Washington press corps' heads to develop a
positive image of the chief executive with the public. However, it was
not until the beginning of the 20th century, with the presidency of
Theodore Roosevelt, that chief executives began to aggressively court,
or as we say today, "spin," the media, with a concerted public
relations effort.
Greenberg, a professor of history and media studies at Rutgers
University, has done an excellent job in writing a series of essays
describing the nature of the presidents serving over the past century
and how they have used the communications technology of their day. As a
historian, he is well equipped to describe events that promoted the
professionalism of presidential public relations. The 44 chapters,
comprised of essays between 10 and 15 pages long, are written in a
journalistic style the author has honed as an editor at Slate and the
New Republic, and as a writer for the New York Times, Washington Post,
Atlantic and other professional and scholarly publications. The book is
especially useful for general readers wanting to know more about
presidents and the press. The Republic of Spin is great for an
undergraduate politics or journalism class, for the focus on people and
events of the day make this book an easy read.
Greenberg's main theme, developed throughout the book's
540 pages with numerous examples, is that spin, defined as the
"huge arsenal of tools and techniques (elected officials and their
aides have used) to shape their messages, their images and our
thinking," has become an integral part of presidential campaigning
and governing. Greenberg writes that spin involves the work done by an
army of campaign consultants, press secretaries, handlers, speechwriters
and other political handlers as well as hacks and flacks to make sure
every public utterance coming from the White House or presidential
campaign is portrayed in the most favorable light. Whether spin is a
good or bad thing seems to be irrelevant to Greenberg. Spin is just
there, and it is a key part of the modern presidency.
To support his theme, Greenberg takes the reader on a tour of the
20th century and the first decade of the 21st, concluding with a
superficial glance at the Obama administration's spin efforts. He
focuses more detail on the development of spin in the first three
quarters of the 20th century, through the end of the presidency of
Richard Nixon in 1974. In fact, Nixon's failure to effectively spin
the Watergate break-in of the Democratic National Committee headquarters
was arguably the most devastating in the history of the presidency.
Greenberg's tour is entertaining, and the reader will learn a
lot about how public relations' early pioneers, such as Ivy
Ledbetter Lee and Edward Bernays, who played a key role in developing
presidential and political public relations. Certain presidents, such as
Theodore and Franklin D. Roosevelt, not surprisingly, played a big role
in expanding the role of spin in the presidency. Woodrow Wilson, the
first president to deliver his State of the Union address in person to
Congress, also found success in the world of spin, though his later
failure to get the Senate to ratify the treaty that would have brought
the nation into the League of Nations marred the end of his presidency.
John F. Kennedy was a master of spin performance in the first live
televised debate in 1960 with Republican candidate Nixon. My favorite
chapter of the book discusses the Kennedy campaign's masterful
handling of reporter Theodore White's chronicling of the 1960
campaign in what would become The Making of the President 1960, which
won the Pulitzer Prize and burnished a positive image for the president
well before his assassination. By giving White unprecedented access to
the Kennedy campaign, and charming his fellow Bostonian, Kennedy showed
that special treatment of individual media members could help make for
favorable treatment with future journalists and historians. White would
go on to chronicle future presidential campaigns in the Making of the
President series throughout the 1960s and 1970s, but it was his 1960
book that won the greatest acclaim. In effect, White showed that
journalists can be persuaded to spin.
Another advantage of Greenberg's historical approach comes
from his mention (although it is by no means emphasized in the text)
that presidents taking advantage of "new media" tend to be
viewed as most successful. Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) used his love
of personal campaigning and celebrity status as war hero in the
Spanish-American War to feed the thirst of the expanding print media of
newspapers and muckraking magazines for political news. Franklin
Roosevelt (1933-1945) used the new medium of radio to deliver carefully
crafted Fireside Chats and build the image of strong leadership that
make him president until nearly the end of World War II. Kennedy
(1961-1963) mastered the new medium of television, and Obama (2009-2017)
was the first president to use spin to harness the power of the
Internet, particularly Facebook, to build a strong positive image in
campaigning and fund raising. The book was written before Donald
Trump's triumphant 2016 campaign, so future historians will get to
analyze whether Trump's use of spin with Twitter feeds will
continue to help him build a following and allow him bypass a hostile
Washington press corps.
Greenberg's book, however, has its flaws. The historical
approach he uses and emphasis on spin causes him to downplay the role
historical events can play in presidential success or failure. Calvin
Coolidge (1923-1929) was a successful president because he presided over
a nation at a time of great prosperity more than because he mastered
spin. Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969) was a legislative master but a poor
television communicator. Yet it would be hard to imagine any president
positively spinning the Vietnam War or the race riots of the late 1960s.
The book's length, and scope, also make it at times appear to
be overly stuffed with facts and people that it is hard for the reader
to focus on what he considers to be the most significant factors
influencing political spin. Greenberg's journalistic and historical
approach makes the book easy to read, but the lack of focus can also
provide the impression of superficiality. The author also focuses too
little on more recent administrations. Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush,
two presidents who were among the more accessible to the media, get
brief treatment, and the Monica Lewinsky scandal is the major focus
given to Bill Clinton's two presidential terms. The chapter on
Obama emphasizes his campaign success but does not explain how or why
his administration was unable to use its talent at spin to make at least
a dent in the partisan opposition in Congress.
Despite these flaws, The Republic of Spin is a useful compilation
of stories on the role political public relations plays in building
successful presidencies. This volume is useful in that so much
information on so many presidents is packed into one book. However,
readers turning to this book for an analysis of the current relationship
between presidency and the media will not find what they want in this
otherwise impressive work.
by Chris Burnett
COPYRIGHT 2017 SJR St. Louis Journalism Review
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.