摘要：The article is about long process of voluntary participation of the Kalmyk people to the Russian subordinationinstead of the recognized day (August 9, 1609), for almost half a century, Russia and Kalmyk people been developing mutual relations, pursuing mutually beneficial conditions for integration. In beginning of the foundation in 17th century with the problems of developing official mutual relationship and introducing Kalmyk, people to the composition of Russia became the basic policy of Russia, in Siberia concerned to the external policy of the southeastern direction. For this questions about Kalmyk people were considered and resolved by the care and higher authorities of the state government of Russia – the kings higher council, the Poland depiction, the issues of foreign policy, the order of the Kazan Castle, the land management on the eastern borders of the country, as well as territorial administrative administrations. The first half of the 17th century is the active period of contacts of the Kalmyk people with Russia with regarding to receive the territory for permanent settlement and establishing relations on the principles of sovereignty. Russian administration, at the early stage of the war, brought forward the conditions of the bringing the Kalmyk people in the Russian Federation military service based on a military-political alliance, if they were unable to pay the money launderers (publishers) and the payment of a certain date, defending the interests of both sides. Because of the flexible national policy of Russia, this long stage ended in the seventeenth century with the incarceration of the Kalmyk State in the composition of the Russian State in the real state of political autonomy with elements of the international law. In condition of transforming autocracy to “absolute Kalmyk autonomic kingdom”, turning to united Russian system, continuously changing legal state, which resulted the reformation in the first half of the 18th century. The Kalmyk government reduced the status of political autonomy and acquired administrational autonomy
