出版社：Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences
摘要：We examined sonic methods of measuring the cohesiveness of sport groups based on Sociometry in order to clearly understand the cohesiveness of sport groups. 0ur subjects were 280 in number from 20 sport groups of colleges and highschools. We applied the sociometric test in order to know the interpersonal combination of the members by means of the index of the tendency toward reciprocation of choice, to find who the stars are by means of index of choice status, and to estimate thc number of the sub-groups and their cleavage by means of the index of sub-group cleavage. We then divided the acquired index value three grades, and theoretically moulded ten model structure patterns by grouping three index values taken from each grade, and examined thc ten patterns in comparison with the sociogram of the actual sport group. The following conclusions are resulted from our examination. 1. It is a proper method of measuring the cohesiveness to theoretically produce the sociogram structure pattern though the three indexes. 2. It is important to check which to be the most proper criterion of choice, because cohesiveness changes as the criterion of choice changes. 3. It is possible to measure thc cohesiveness of thc sociometric structure through the personal, the mutual, and the group aspects, by means of the three indexes and sociogram. We cannot measure the cohesiveness without any one of the three aspects and the two means.
其他摘要：We examined sonic methods of measuring the cohesiveness of sport groups based on Sociometry in order to clearly understand the cohesiveness of sport groups. 0ur subjects were 280 in number from 20 sport groups of colleges and highschools. We applied the sociometric test in order to know the interpersonal combination of the members by means of the index of the tendency toward reciprocation of choice, to find who the stars are by means of index of choice status, and to estimate thc number of the sub-groups and their cleavage by means of the index of sub-group cleavage. We then divided the acquired index value three grades, and theoretically moulded ten model structure patterns by grouping three index values taken from each grade, and examined thc ten patterns in comparison with the sociogram of the actual sport group. The following conclusions are resulted from our examination. 1. It is a proper method of measuring the cohesiveness to theoretically produce the sociogram structure pattern though the three indexes. 2. It is important to check which to be the most proper criterion of choice, because cohesiveness changes as the criterion of choice changes. 3. It is possible to measure thc cohesiveness of thc sociometric structure through the personal, the mutual, and the group aspects, by means of the three indexes and sociogram. We cannot measure the cohesiveness without any one of the three aspects and the two means.
