首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月25日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:FDI and Economic Growth in European Transition Economies: Panel Data Analysis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:yağmur sağlam
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Yasar University
  • 印刷版ISSN:1305-970X
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:46
  • 页码:123-135
  • DOI:10.19168/jyu.29773
  • 出版社:Yasar University
  • 摘要:The main purpose of this paper is to investigate relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth based on 14 European Transition Economies for the period 1995 to 2014. Empirical model includes GDP per capita growth (% annual), foreign direct investment, net inflows (% GDP) and composit e index which is developed with PCA to see the effect of determinants of FDI on GDP as an independent variable . Firstly homogeneity and cross sectional dependence among units are examined with Delta and 퐶퐷 퐿푀 tests and it is found that all series have h eterogeneity and cross sectional dependency. For that reason, second generation Multifactor error structure (Pesaran et al, 2013) panel un it root test is used and it is also taken into account e ffect of unobserved common factors as a prerequisite of CCE Mo del just after proving the co - integration relationship and causality between variables via of Durbin - Hausmann (Westerlund, 2008 ) co - integration and Dumetriscu - Hurlin (2012) causality tests. Obtained results strongly support one - way causality from foreign d irect investments and composite index to economic growth. Unfortunately, there is no causality between foreign direct investments and comp osite index. The findings indicate that foreign direct investments contribute negatively to economic growth in contras t to theory points out but determinants of FDI contribute positively a t European transition countries. The results show that in Albania, Latvia, Romania and Slovenia foreign direct investments and composite index have positive contributions to economic gro wth in contrast to Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Slovak Republic. Some countries have special and opposite situation. For example; in Croatia, Cze ch Republic, Hungary, Estonia and Lithuania FDI has negative coefficients but composite index h as positive coefficients. Poland is the only exception for composite index has negative but FDI has positive contribution to the economic growth.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有