摘要：Modeling internal combustion engines (I.C.E.) can be made following different approaches, depending on the type of problem to be simulated. 1D models can be used to study unsteady conditions of the engine or for those applications requiring a great number of cycles to be simulated. Such models can also be used to give boundary conditions for 3D codes since it is still computationally hard, for the latter, the simulation of the whole engine. The basic idea of this paper is to couple the two methods in order to use the peculiarity of both. The coupling is based on the transfer of the interface boundary conditions of the two codes at each time step. The 1D code is based on a finite volume high resolution TVD scheme while the 3D code is a modified version, able to model GDI full cycle, of the well known Kiva code. For the 3D code a boundary condition based on the mass flow rate and the pressure obtained from the 1D code, is applied. For the 1D code we have adopted an absorbing boundary conditions strategy to compute the flow state at the coupling interface. In this paper we present details of the implementation and results of a four cylinder engine where experimental measurements are available. In this problem the intake plenum is solved by the 3D code while the 1D code is used for the rest of the whole engine configuration. This development will be applied in the near future for engine design optimization.
其他摘要：Modeling internal combustion engines (I.C.E.) can be made following different approaches, depending on the type of problem to be simulated. 1D models can be used to study unsteady conditions of the engine or for those applications requiring a great number of cycles to be simulated. Such models can also be used to give boundary conditions for 3D codes since it is still computationally hard, for the latter, the simulation of the whole engine. The basic idea of this paper is to couple the two methods in order to use the peculiarity of both. The coupling is based on the transfer of the interface boundary conditions of the two codes at each time step. The 1D code is based on a finite volume high resolution TVD scheme while the 3D code is a modified version, able to model GDI full cycle, of the well known Kiva code. For the 3D code a boundary condition based on the mass flow rate and the pressure obtained from the 1D code, is applied. For the 1D code we have adopted an absorbing boundary conditions strategy to compute the flow state at the coupling interface. In this paper we present details of the implementation and results of a four cylinder engine where experimental measurements are available. In this problem the intake plenum is solved by the 3D code while the 1D code is used for the rest of the whole engine configuration. This development will be applied in the near future for engine design optimization.
