首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Negin Mirriahi ; Dennis Alonzo ; Bob Fox
  • 期刊名称:Research in Learning Technology
  • 印刷版ISSN:2156-7077
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:23
  • DOI:10.3402/rlt.v23.28451
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Research in Learning Technology
  • 摘要:The need for flexibility in learning and the affordances of technology provided the impetus for the rise of blended learning (BL) globally across higher education institutions. However, the adoption of BL practices continues at a low pace due to academics’ low digital fluency, various views and BL definitions, and limited standards-based tools to guide academic practice. To address these issues, this paper introduces a BL framework, based on one definition and with criteria and standards of practice to support the evaluation and advancement of BL in higher education. The framework is theoretically underpinned by the extant literature and supported by focus group discussions. The evidence supporting the criteria and standards are discussed with suggestions for how they can be used to guide course design, academic practice, and professional development. Keywords: digital literacy; criteria; standards; academic development; curriculum design (Published: 26 October 2015) Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2015, 23 : 28451 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28451
  • 其他摘要:The need for flexibility in learning and the affordances of technology provided the impetus for the rise of blended learning (BL) globally across higher education institutions. However, the adoption of BL practices continues at a low pace due to academics’ low digital fluency, various views and BL definitions, and limited standards-based tools to guide academic practice. To address these issues, this paper introduces a BL framework, based on one definition and with criteria and standards of practice to support the evaluation and advancement of BL in higher education. The framework is theoretically underpinned by the extant literature and supported by focus group discussions. The evidence supporting the criteria and standards are discussed with suggestions for how they can be used to guide course design, academic practice, and professional development.
  • 关键词:Keywords: digital literacy; criteria; standards; academic development; curriculum design
  • 其他关键词:digital literacy;criteria;standards;academic development;curriculum design
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有