首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月04日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Refractory Outcomes after Cataract Surgery in Acute Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma Patients Treated with Laser Iridotomy
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Hwang, Hye Seong ; Kim, Dong Yoon ; Kim, Hyun Tae
  • 期刊名称:Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 印刷版ISSN:0378-6471
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:60
  • 期号:5
  • 页码:447-454
  • DOI:10.3341/jkos.2019.60.5.447
  • 出版社:The Korean Ophthalmological Society
  • 摘要:Purpose

    To analyze the accuracy of ocular biometry and prediction of postoperative refraction after cataract surgery in acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) patients treated with laser iridotomy (LI).

    Methods

    We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 44 patients who underwent cataract surgery after LI due to ACG (ACG group), and 37 patients who underwent cataract surgery without ocular disease other than cataract (control group) from January 2015 to May 2018. An Acrysof® single piece (SN60WF) was used as the intraocular lens. We performed preoperative ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculations using AL-Scan®. The accuracy of the postoperative refractive power prediction was analyzed according to the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL).

    Results

    The preoperative ACD was 2.29 ± 0.32 mm in the ACG group and 3.15 ± 0.27 mm in the control group ( p < 0.01), and the respective AL values were 22.53 ± 0.80 mm and 23.87 ± 1.38 mm ( p < 0.01). Using the Haigis formula, patients with an ACD < 2.30 mm in the ACG group (0.52 ± 0.36 diopters [D]) had less accurate results in terms of the mean absolute error than patients with an ACD > 2.31 mm in the ACG group (0.27 ± 0.20 D) and control group (0.27 ± 0.20 D). There was no significant difference in the mean absoluter error between each formula in patients with an AL of < 22.0 mm or > 22.1 mm in the ACG and control groups.

    Conclusions

    Among patients treated with LI due to ACG, those patients with an ACD > 2.31 mm showed no difference in refractory prediction compared to the control group. However, in patients with an ACD < 2.30 mm, the refractory prediction may be inaccurate when using the Haigis formula, a fourth-generation formula that takes into account the ACD.

  • 关键词:AL-Scan®; Angle-closure glaucoma; Anterior chamber; Axial length; Refractive errors
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有