首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月03日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Fairness and objectivity of a multiple scenario objective structured clinical examination
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Johannes Spanke ; Christina Raus ; Annekathrin Haase
  • 期刊名称:GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung
  • 印刷版ISSN:1860-3572
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:36
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:1-17
  • DOI:10.3205/zma001234
  • 出版社:German Medical Science
  • 摘要:Introduction: The aim of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a standardized and fair assessment of clinical skills. Observing second clinical year medical students during a summative OSCE assessing a General Practice clerkship, we noticed that information exchange with peers led to a progressively faster and overly focused management of simulations. Therefore, we established a Multiple Scenario-OSCE (MS-OSCE) where all students had to manage the same chief complaint at a station but it’s underlying scenarios being randomly changed during students’ rotation through their parcours. We wanted to ensure they fully explore differential diagnosis instead of managing their task influenced by shared information. We wanted to assess if a MS-OSCE violates the assumption of objectivity and fairness given that students are not tested with the same scenarios. Methods: We developed and piloted five OSCE stations (chest pain, abdominal pain, back pain, fatigue and acute cough) with two or three different underlying scenarios each. At each station these scenarios randomly changed from student to student. Performance was assessed with a checklist and global rating. The effect of scenarios and raters on students’ grades was assessed calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient with a fixed effect two level linear model. Results: A total of 169 students and 23 raters participated in the MS-OSCE. The internal consistency over all stations was 0.65 by Cronbach’s alpha. The difference of the mean grades between the scenarios of a given chief complaint ranged from 0.03 to 0.4 on a 1 to 5 grading scale. The effect of scenarios on the variance of the final grades at each station ranged from 4% to 9% and of raters from 20% to 50% when adjusted for students’ skills. Conclusions: The effect of different scenarios on the grades was relevant but small compared to the effect of raters on grades. Improving rater training is more important to ensure objectivity and fairness of MS-OSCE than providing the same scenario to all students.
  • 关键词:medical students; medical education; objective structured clinical examination; rater effects
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有