摘要：Статья посвящена теоретическому обоснованию юридической природы института позитивной конституционной ответственности, ее роли в закреплении и поддержании режима конституционной законности. Прослеживается эволюция взглядов на институт позитивной конституционной ответственности с первых работ о ней (С.А. Авакьян, Ю.П. Ерёменко, Ф.М. Рудинский, Н.А. Боброва) до настоящего времени. Сомнения в юридической природе позитивной конституционной ответственности вплоть до ее полного отрицания тождественны сомнениям в юридической природе многих конституционных норм, отрицанию их прямого действия. Эти споры будут продолжаться вечно. Сделан вывод о необходимости законодательного закрепления механизмов применения конституционной ответственности в России.
其他摘要：The subject of the paper is theoretical justification of legal nature of positive constitutional responsibility legal institute. The evolution of views on the institution of positive constitutional responsibility from the first works on it (S.A. Avak`yan, Yu.P. Eremenko, F.M. Rudinsky, N.A. Bobrova) to the present time is analyzed. The purpose is to clarify its role in establishment and maintaining the regime of constitutional legality. The results, scope of application. Doubts about the legal nature of positive constitutional responsibility up to its complete denial are identical with doubts about the legal nature of many constitutional norms, the denial of their direct action. These disputes will last forever. Direct service of constitutional and legal responsibility to the quality of governance is a feature of this type of legal responsibility along with its pronounced political character, as well as the specific guilt of the subject of constitutional tort (liability not only for their acts but for the acts of their subordinates). The emphasis on positive moral aspect to the detriment of "sanction" (retrospective) aspect of the constitutional responsibility does not meet the challenges of the new time. Proponents of affirmative responsibility had good purpose to build its high creative and educational role from the positive side of the legal liability. However, this good purpose in practice has not led to optimistic results. The authors come to the conclusion the legal regulation of mechanisms of responsibility enforcement in Russia is necessary.
