首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月08日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of Two Approaches to Methodology of Legal Theory
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Chong ZHANG
  • 期刊名称:Canadian Social Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:1712-8056
  • 电子版ISSN:1923-6697
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:15
  • 期号:5
  • 页码:41-47
  • DOI:10.3968/11058
  • 出版社:Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
  • 摘要:This paper focuses on one of the main arguments in contemporary Anglo-American legal circles: what is the essence of legal theory? This paper is divided into three parts: the first part combs the methodology approach of descriptive method theory, represented by Hart, Raz and, more recently, Julie Dickson, and sums up its three important propositions; the second part summarizes the criticism of the descriptive theory by non-positivism scholars such as Dworkin, Finnis and Stephen Perry; in the third part I put forward my conclusion on the basis of the first two parts: the theory of descriptive law is not a successful legal theory, which should be a theory based on descriptive and normative methodology.
  • 关键词:Methodology of legal theory;Descriptive;Normative
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有