摘要：The article considers the main issues of determining technological and engineering equipment as objects of civil rights from the point of view of classifying this category as movable and immovable property. The urgency of the problem of technological and engineering equipment from the point of view of civil turnover is the misinterpretation and assignment of geotechnical objects to the category of movable (immovable) property, which causes a number of problems in practice, leading to unreasonable taxation or unreasonable exclusion of the categories in question as a taxable object.
其他摘要：The article considers the main issues of determining technological and engineering equipment as objects of civil rights from the point of view of classifying this category as movable and immovable property. The urgency of the problem of technological and engineering equipment from the point of view of civil turnover is the misinterpretation and assignment of geotechnical objects to the category of movable (immovable) property, which causes a number of problems in practice, leading to unreasonable taxation or unreasonable exclusion of the categories in question as a taxable object.
