首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月03日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Treatment performance comparison between regular O 3 –BAC and O 3 –BAC with rear sand filtration: verification in a full-scale study
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Kai Yang ; Jianwei Yu ; Qingyuan Guo
  • 期刊名称:Environmental Sciences Europe
  • 印刷版ISSN:2190-4715
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:31
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-9
  • DOI:10.1186/s12302-019-0229-6
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:To improve the microbial safety of drinking water, an arrangement of O3–BAC with rear sand filtration (O3–BAC–sand) has been proposed. In this study, efforts were devoted to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of O3–BAC–sand in a full-scale water treatment plant. The performance of the two configurations was compared in terms of particles, turbidity, CODMn and typical odorants and pesticides. The O3–BAC–sand yielded lower turbidity but higher CODMn (by approximately 7%) in the finished water than regular O3–BAC (sand–O3–BAC). Both systems removed odors in raw water; however, sand–O3–BAC was more effective on septic and musty odorants. The total pesticide removals by sand–O3–BAC and O3–BAC–sand were 78% and 72%, respectively; though the latter had shorter activated carbon durable years. The re-location of the sand filter would sacrifice the BAC efficiency in removals of organic matter and micropollutants. This tradeoff is a result of the loss of the particulate organic matter removal by sand filters, because locating the sand filter behind BAC causes particle load increase on BAC; some measures of enhanced coagulation should be suggested to improve the turbidity and particle removal. The study will be helpful for improvement of the O3–BAC process in drinking water treatment.
  • 关键词:Sand;O3;BAC;O3;BAC;sand;Sand filter interception;Drinking water treatment
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有