首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月27日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Metaescepticismo
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:David Pérez Chico ; Vicente Sanfélix Vidarte
  • 期刊名称:Estudios de Filosofía
  • 印刷版ISSN:2256-358X
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 期号:60
  • 页码:183-202
  • DOI:10.17533/10.17533/udea.ef.n60a09
  • 出版社:Instituto de Filosofía, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia.
  • 摘要:In the present article we subscribe to a form of meta-skepticism according to which the theory of knowledge is impossible. This form of meta-skepticism is based on two apparently necessary conditions: (1) the identification of one or more of the assumptions of the theory of knowledge in order to criticize them; and (2) the more or less explicit assumption that there is an alternative account of knowledge to the one attributed to the theory of knowledge in question. Once these preliminary issues have been clarified, we will review di erent varieties of meta-skepticism in order to verify whether all of them, even the most austere, satisfy the previous two conditions. This will lead us to conclude, in the first place, that all varieties of meta-skepticism satisfy them and, secondly, that no type of meta-skepticism is free of epistemological implications. In the light of this conclusion, we will end up considering whether meta-skepticism stands its ground.
  • 关键词:metaescepticismo; teoría del conocimiento; Leonard Nelson; Quine; Rorty; Wittgenstein
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有