摘要：Direct torque control (DTC) and model predictive control (MPC) are widely used in the control of permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM). However, DTC for PMSM can cause large torque ripples and flux ripples, high harmonic distortion of the stator current, and high acoustic noises. Compared to DTC, MPC considers all possible switching states which can reduce the ripples of torque and flux. MPC with one-step delay compensation for PMSM and DTC with one-step delay compensation and two hysteresis comparators for PMSM have been proposed to solve some drawbacks of these two controllers. This paper makes a detailed comparison between these two improved control methods through Simulink and hardware experiments results to analyse the four indicators-torque ripple, flux ripple, transient time and THD of inverter current.
其他摘要：Direct torque control (DTC) and model predictive control (MPC) are widely used in the control of permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM). However, DTC for PMSM can cause large torque ripples and flux ripples, high harmonic distortion of the stator current, and high acoustic noises. Compared to DTC, MPC considers all possible switching states which can reduce the ripples of torque and flux. MPC with one-step delay compensation for PMSM and DTC with one-step delay compensation and two hysteresis comparators for PMSM have been proposed to solve some drawbacks of these two controllers. This paper makes a detailed comparison between these two improved control methods through Simulink and hardware experiments results to analyse the four indicators-torque ripple, flux ripple, transient time and THD of inverter current.
