首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月18日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Reply to Morueta-Holme et al.: Humboldt's historical data are not messy, they just need expert examination
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Naoyuki Kamiyama ; Yusuke Kobayashi ; Yoshio Okamoto
  • 期刊名称:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 印刷版ISSN:0027-8424
  • 电子版ISSN:1091-6490
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:116
  • 期号:43
  • 页码:21348-21349
  • DOI:10.1073/pnas.1914132116
  • 出版社:The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 摘要:Humboldt and Bonpland’s expedition is unique in the history of biological sciences, not only for the novel theoretical concepts it gave rise to, but also for the outstanding quality of the locality data recorded for thousands of plants. The inconsistencies that distort Humboldt’s Tableau Physique (1) should not overshadow the fact that, in most cases, the exact provenance of the collected plants can be retrieved from a cross-analysis of diaries, herbaria, and botanical publications, all now accessible online (references in ref. 1). The key question of the role of Chimborazo in the definition of vegetation zones must be addressed in this context, avoiding pointless speculations on “possibly.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有