首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月05日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:What Are Case Studies Good For? A Response to Commentaries by McMullen and Karlin
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Sam R. Hamburg ; Sam R. Hamburg
  • 期刊名称:Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy
  • 印刷版ISSN:1553-0124
  • 电子版ISSN:1553-0124
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:348-352
  • DOI:10.14713/pcsp.v13i4.2023
  • 出版社:Rutgers University
  • 摘要:I am grateful to Linda McMullen (2018) and Robert Karlin (2018), for their commentaries on my case studies of Margie and Amie (Hamburg, 2018). Although case studies do not permit strong claims regarding treatment efficacy, they allow strong claims for the plausibility that treatments are efficacious. From a pragmatic standpoint, that is sufficient to justify proposing the treatments to other practitioners to be tried and tested by them, thereby ultimately contributing to the sum total of psychotherapy craft knowledge. On the topic of the placebo effect, the perspectives of researchers and clinicians, based as they are on different kinds of knowledge, can differ to the point of irreconcilability. What have hitherto been characterized as non-specific contributors to treatment outcome might better be classified as specific factors yet to be identified..
  • 关键词:treatment outcome;placebo effect;non;specifics in psychotherapy;craft knowledge;case studies;clinical case studies
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有