首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月07日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Evaluation: is an open book examination easier?
  • 其他标题:Evaluation: is an open book examination easier?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Dr Richard Brightwell ; Ms Janine-Helen Daniel ; Dr Angus Stewart
  • 期刊名称:Higher Education Pedagogies
  • 电子版ISSN:2375-2696
  • 出版年度:2004
  • 卷号:3
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-10
  • DOI:10.3108/beej.2004.03000004
  • 出版社:Taylor and Francis Ltd
  • 摘要:In terms of the assessment of students, it is generally accepted that open book examinations create an enriched environment, offering the student an opportunity to better understand and respond to a particular question. The present study provided the opportunity to examine this assumption and test it in a controlled manner.During the study of an introductory University Anatomy and Physiology unit, students were required to complete two assessments. The first assessment was an online multiple-choice examination with 50 questions either reviewing concepts or requiring critical thinking and clinical applications. This test was first undertaken by students (N=196) in class time. The results were analysed and the opportunity was offered for the students to repeat the test with the assistance of their textbooks. Upon repeating the test under these conditions it was shown that there was no significant difference between the means of the scores.It was concluded that a suitably constructed set of questions could be used to discriminate student abilities in either an open or closed book environment.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有