首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月07日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Julia L. Magnay ; Shaughn O’Brien ; Christoph Gerlinger
  • 期刊名称:BMC Women's Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:1472-6874
  • 电子版ISSN:1472-6874
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:20
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-15
  • DOI:10.1186/s12905-020-0887-y
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Pictorial blood loss assessment charts (PBACs) represent the most widely used method to assess menstrual blood loss (MBL) in clinical trials. The aims of this review were to: (1) determine the diagnostic accuracy of PBACs that have been validated against the reference alkaline hematin technique; (2) categorize the pitfalls of using obsolete and nonvalidated charts; (3) provide guidelines for development of a new PBAC or use of an existing chart to measure MBL in clinical trials; and (4) consider the feasibility of using pictorial charts in primary care. A literature review was conducted using Embase and MEDLINE databases. The review identified reports of women with self-perceived or actual heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), bleeding disorders, abnormal uterine bleeding, leiomyomata (uterine fibroids) or endometriosis, and women undergoing treatment for HMB, as well as those with normal menstrual periods. Data were reviewed from studies that focused on the development and validation of PBACs and from those that used derivative noncertified charts to assess HMB. Nine studies reported validation of PBAC scoring systems against the alkaline hematin technique. Across these studies, the sensitivity was 58–97%, the specificity was 7.5–95.5%, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.1–13.8 and 0.14–0.56, respectively, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 2.6–52.4. The cut-off score above which the diagnosis of HMB was made ranged from 50 to 185. Several modifications of these PBACs were used in other studies; however, objective confirmation of their validity was not reported. Overall, there was widespread inconsistency of chart design, scoring systems, diagnostic cut-off limits and post-treatment outcome measures. PBACs are best suited to the controlled and specific environment of clinical studies, where clinical outcome parameters are defined. The current lack of standardization precludes widespread use of the PBAC in primary care. PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD42016030083.
  • 关键词:Menstrual blood loss;Pictorial blood loss assessment chart;Alkaline hematin;Heavy menstrual bleeding;Menstrual pictogram;Abnormal uterine bleeding;Bleeding disorders;Uterine fibroids;Endometriosis
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有