期刊名称：Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
印刷版ISSN：1232-1966
电子版ISSN：1898-2263
出版年度：2018
卷号：25
期号：3
页码：1-6
DOI：10.26444/aaem/85177
出版社：Institute of Agricultural Medicine in Lublin
摘要：Introduction. The current health and safety management system under the Occupational Health and Safety Act has avoided
agriculture in Korea. It is important to consider the various safety systems used in agricultural health and safety to develop
effective regulations.
Objective. The aims were to classify and review the items from various checklists using safety systems, such as design,
training, etc., ultimately aimed at proposing directions for improving the health and safety of farmers.
Materials and method. Among the retrieved checklists with Google, four were chosen for this study, based on criteria such
as the Checklist developed by an international organization, as well as others. Each item on the checklist was categorized
using criteria concerning safety systems, developed based on previous studies.
Results. The total number of analyzed items was 573, which is 36 more than the actual number of checklist items (537). The
proportion of items belonging to the training/procedures system was the highest (32.5%); the second-highest was for the
mitigation system – 18.2%.; the third-largest proportion of items was maintenance/inspection – with 14.3%. Items related
to the design and human factor systems were 8.2% and 5.6%, respectively. The safety system with the lowest proportion
was the warning/notification system – 4.2% of the total items. The proportion of items that could not be classified into
safety systems was found to be 16.1%.
Conclusions. A large number of items belonging to the training/procedures system reported as occasionally not effective
in prevention of injury were found in the checklists. It appears important to develop checklist items proposing the
supplementation of various safety systems, rather than presenting items that are biased towards certain safety systems.
