期刊名称：International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences
印刷版ISSN：2146-1961
出版年度：2019
卷号：36
页码：1-12
出版社：Avrasya Değerler Eğitimi Derneği
摘要：This study aims to provide a realistic viewpoint based on academicians’ views about what the
quality of scientific publication means and to provide criteria / recommendations for determining
the quality of a scientific research. From qualitative research methods, case study has been
preferred in this study which allows comprehending an event or situation in detail. From
purposeful sampling techniques, criterion sampling has been used for selection of participants.
Participants involve 22 academicians who work at a higher education institution and take academic
incentive payment. 22 percent of participants (n=5) include research assistants, 22 percent (n=5)
assistant professors; 31 percent (n=7) associate professors; and 27 percent (n=6) professors. Semistructured
interview form has been used for collecting qualitative data. When themes and codes
are analyzed which appear as a result of study, it is observed that academicians regard the
following criteria as an indicator of quality in a research: “Appropriateness of Abstract” theme;
“Contribution to Literature” theme, “Originality” theme, “Identification of Scope and Focus”
theme, “Scientific” theme, “Comprehensiveness” theme, “Reporting” theme, “Ethic” theme. There
comes out 8 themes and 28 codes within the category of research quality criteria adopted by
academicians.
关键词：Research quality criteria; quality of a scientific publication; indicators of quality in a
research;
