首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月20日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The burden of chronic diseases across Europe: what policies and programs to address diabetes? A SWOT analysis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Angela Giusti ; Marina Maggini ; Sofia Colaceci
  • 期刊名称:Health Research Policy and Systems
  • 印刷版ISSN:1478-4505
  • 电子版ISSN:1478-4505
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:18
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-7
  • DOI:10.1186/s12961-019-0523-1
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:Promoting the well-being at all ages and reducing premature mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is a major target of the Sustainable Development Goals. In the frame of the JA-CHRODIS, a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis was conducted to provide different countries’ insights on what makes a policy/programme addressing NCDs applicable, sustainable and effective, with a focus on diabetes. A qualitative study has been performed using a SWOT analysis on policies/programmes at the national/federal or subnational level. By March 2016, 14 SWOTs were conducted involving 11 European countries and 57 stakeholders and Ministries of Health, reporting and analysing a total of 44 policies. The main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats have been outlined as well as and the main areas for governance improvement. A binding trans-sectoral approach is necessary to tackle the underlying risk factors of inequalities. The culture of disease prevention and health promotion is still low while the biomedical paradigm prevails. A systematic gender perspective is still missing. Sharing and exchange of best practices, as sponsored by the European Commission, is acting as a motivator. The SWOT analyses draw an overall picture of the complexity of designing and implementing good policies and programmes that are tailored to local needs. These results may apply to any context and can be used by decision-makers, managers, professionals and other stakeholders to focus on key issues, recognising areas for attention.
  • 关键词:SWOT analysis;non;communicable diseases;policy;diabetes programmes;governance;healthcare;intersectoral collaboration;stakeholder participation
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有