首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月05日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of essential medicines lists in 137 countries
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Nav Persaud ; Maggie Jiang ; Roha Shaikh
  • 期刊名称:Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • 印刷版ISSN:0042-9686
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:97
  • 期号:6
  • 页码:394-404
  • DOI:10.2471/BLT.18.222448
  • 出版社:World Health Organisation
  • 摘要:Objective To compare the medicines included in national essential medicines lists with the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Model list of essential medicines , and assess the extent to which countries’ characteristics, such as WHO region, size and health care expenditure, account for the differences. Methods We searched the WHO’s Essential Medicines and Health Products Information Portal for national essential medicines lists. We compared each national list of essential medicines with both the 2017 WHO model list and other national lists. We used linear regression to determine whether differences were dependent on WHO Region, population size, life expectancy, infant mortality, gross domestic product and health-care expenditure. Findings We identified 137 national lists of essential medicines that collectively included 2068 unique medicines. Each national list contained between 44 and 983 medicines (median 310: interquartile range, IQR: 269 to 422). The number of differences between each country’s essential medicines list and WHO’s model list ranged from 93 to 815 (median: 296; IQR: 265 to 381). Linear regression showed that only WHO region and health-care expenditure were significantly associated with the number of differences (adjusted R 2 : 0.33; P < 0.05). Most medicines (1248; 60%) were listed by no more than 10% (14) of countries. Conclusion The substantial differences between national lists of essential medicines are only partly explained by differences in country characteristics and thus may not be related to different priority needs. This information helps to identify opportunities to improve essential medicines lists.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有