标题：Parametric studies on the ductility of axial loaded square reinforced concrete column made of normal-strength concrete (NSC) and high-strength steel confining rebar (HSSCR) with various ties configuration
摘要：During an earthquake, Reinforced Concrete (RC) building structures should behave in a ductile manner to prevent the structures from collapse. Therefore, the column element should have sufficient ductility to sustain an axial load at the post-peak region. Ductility of the RC column can be sufficiently provided by confinement to the RC column core. Therefore, in this paper, ductility of square RC columns made of NSC and HSSCR are analyzed using three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis (3D-NLFEA) with various ties configurations. In total, 12 specimens for each transverse steel rebar configuration were examined. The measurement used for ductility comparisons is the I10 index (AS 3600-2018) which is compared with the concept of ductility available in the literature (for example ACI 318-14). The study found that the computed minimum transverse steel rebar diameter based on ACI 318-14 showed larger diameter than the AS 3600:2018. From the 3DNLFEA analysis found that using a confining rebar higher than 700 MPa with the same volumetric ratio shows lower ductility for the Type I RC column configuration.
其他摘要：During an earthquake, Reinforced Concrete (RC) building structures should behave in a ductile manner to prevent the structures from collapse. Therefore, the column element should have sufficient ductility to sustain an axial load at the post-peak region. Ductility of the RC column can be sufficiently provided by confinement to the RC column core. Therefore, in this paper, ductility of square RC columns made of NSC and HSSCR are analyzed using three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis (3D-NLFEA) with various ties configurations. In total, 12 specimens for each transverse steel rebar configuration were examined. The measurement used for ductility comparisons is the I10 index (AS 3600-2018) which is compared with the concept of ductility available in the literature (for example ACI 318-14). The study found that the computed minimum transverse steel rebar diameter based on ACI 318-14 showed larger diameter than the AS 3600:2018. From the 3DNLFEA analysis found that using a confining rebar higher than 700 MPa with the same volumetric ratio shows lower ductility for the Type I RC column configuration.
