首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月29日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Utilisation and prevalence of mixed methods research in library and information research in South Africa 2002-2008
  • 其他标题:Utilisation and prevalence of mixed methods research in library and information research in South Africa 2002-2008
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Patrick Ngulube ; Koketso Mokwatlo ; Sipho Ndwandwe
  • 期刊名称:South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:0256-8861
  • 电子版ISSN:2304-8263
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:75
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:105-116
  • DOI:10.7553/75-2-91
  • 出版社:Stellenbosch University
  • 摘要:This article explores the use of mixed methods research (MMR) in library and information science (LIS) research in South Africa from 2000 to 2008. The authors contrast the mixed methods research debate in the general methodological literature to how this method was practiced within the LIS scientific community. They reviewed 613 research articles published in six peer-reviewed LIS journals in South Africa, finding the research methods in these journals to be surveys drawing on positivistic assumptions and cross-sectional designs, and historical research based on constructivist knowledge claims. Mixed methods approaches that the authors identified in the methodological literature have had little impact on LIS research in South Africa. Given these limitations, the authors argue for greater methodological pluralism in conducting research in LIS and recommend the use of mixed methods research.
  • 其他摘要:This article explores the use of mixed methods research (MMR) in library and information science (LIS) research in South Africa from 2000 to 2008. The authors contrast the mixed methods research debate in the general methodological literature to how this method was practiced within the LIS scientific community. They reviewed 613 research articles published in six peer-reviewed LIS journals in South Africa, finding the research methods in these journals to be surveys drawing on positivistic assumptions and cross-sectional designs, and historical research based on constructivist knowledge claims. Mixed methods approaches that the authors identified in the methodological literature have had little impact on LIS research in South Africa. Given these limitations, the authors argue for greater methodological pluralism in conducting research in LIS and recommend the use of mixed methods research.
  • 关键词:Evaluation of research; methodological pluralism; mixed methods research; research design; research in library and information science
  • 其他关键词:Evaluation of research;methodological pluralism;mixed methods research;research design;research in library and information science
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有