首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月24日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The administration of the doctoral examination at South African higher education institutions
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:S. Schulze ; E.M. Lemmer
  • 期刊名称:South African Journal of Higher Education
  • 印刷版ISSN:1011-3487
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:33
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:180-194
  • DOI:10.20853/33-2-2966
  • 出版社:African Journals Online
  • 摘要:The doctorate is the apex of all qualifications in universities worldwide and in South Africa. The expected outcome of the doctorate is original research, presented as a thesis. The thesis should demonstrate a student’s ability to do high-level research and contribute meaningfully to a discipline. Thesis assessment is through the submission of written examiner reports by examiners external to the university. However, the literature indicates limitations in thesis examination. A qualitative study was undertaken at six South African universities to gather data from a purposeful sample of expert informants and relevant documents. Wenger and Lave’s (1991) Community of Practice theory informed the inquiry. The findings indicated challenges in appointing examiners; vague criteria for ancillary requirements to the thesis; and discrepancies in the quality of examiner reports and examiner recommendations, which delay graduation. Recommendations were made for a more transparent examination process and supervisor training in the examination process.
  • 其他摘要:The doctorate is the apex of all qualifications in universities worldwide and in South Africa. The expected outcome of the doctorate is original research, presented as a thesis. The thesis should demonstrate a student’s ability to do high-level research and contribute meaningfully to a discipline . T hesis assessment is through the submission of written examiner reports by examiners external to the university. However, the literature indicates limitations in thesis examination. A qualitative study was undertaken at six South African universities to gather data from a purposeful sample of expert informants and relevant documents. Wenger and Lave’s (1991) Community of Practice theory informed the inquiry. The findings indicated challenges in appointing examiners; vague criteria for ancillary requirements to the thesis; and discrepancies in the quality of examiner reports and examiner recommendations, which delay graduation. Recommendations were made for a more transparent examination process and supervisor training in the examination process.
  • 关键词:doctoral examination; higher education institutions; South African universities
  • 其他关键词:doctoral examination;higher education institutions;South African universities
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有