摘要：This study is a normative legal research. The study aims to examine the function of harmonization between DPD and the DPR in agency representatives in bicameral systemApproach is used in this study are the historical, the statute, the comparative, the conceptual, and the case approach. Data collection by collecting primary legal materials and secondary. Primary legal materials studied and identified with the “Irac”, while secondary legal materials are accounted for using the card system, which is based on the research subject. These materials are searched legal relationship between one and the other uses reasoning (analysis) deductive and inductive to generate propositions and concepts, either the definition, description, and classification as a result of research. Deductive analysis starts from the provisions made UUDNRI 1945 and with the support of secondary legal materials including literature of constitutional law concerning state agency DPD. The results show that DPD as state agencies in a bicameral system is formulated as a representative body of the people who are institutionally have equal footing with the DPR, even in terms of the representation of character based on regions, DPD has a broader representation of the character of the DPR because the dimensions of representativeness based to all the people who are in these areas. , the DPD as a representative body of the people have the duty and authority as the DPR, which has the function of the budget, legislation, and despite the limited supervision. , in the context of constitutional Indonesia, there is no synchronization and harmonization of the position and function of the DPD and DPR, it weakened the state DPD function as a state institution.
其他摘要：A b s t r a c t T h i s study is a normative legal research. The study aims to examine the function of harmonization between DPD and the DPR in agency representatives in bicameral system . Approach is used in this study are the historical, the statute, the comparative, the conceptual, and the case approach. Data collection by collecting primary legal materials and secondary. Primary legal materials studied and identified with the “Irac”, while secondary legal materials are accounted for using the card system, which is based on the research subject. These materials are searched legal relationship between one and the other uses reasoning (analysis) deductive and inductive to generate propositions and concepts, either the definition, description, and classification as a result of research. Deductive analysis starts from the provisions made UUDNRI 1945 and with the support of secondary legal materials including literature of constitutional law concerning state agency DPD. The results show that the first, DPD as state agencies in a bicameral system is formulated as a representative body of the people who are institutionally have equal footing with the DPR, even in terms of the representation of character based on regions, DPD has a broader representation of the character of the DPR because the dimensions of representativeness based to all the people who are in these areas. Second , the DPD as a representative body of the people have the duty and authority as the DPR, which has the function of the budget, legislation, and despite the limited supervision. Third , in the context of constitutional Indonesia, there is no synchronization and harmonization of the position and function of the DPD and DPR, it weakened the state DPD function as a state institution.
关键词：the function of checks and balances; bicameral system; synchronization; harmonization; people representative institution
