首页    期刊浏览 2025年04月17日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Most Frequent Metacognitive Strategies Used in Reading Comprehension among ESP Learners
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Hooshang Khoshsima ; Elham Amiri Samani
  • 期刊名称:Advances in Language and Literary Studies
  • 电子版ISSN:2203-4714
  • 出版年度:2015
  • 卷号:6
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:180-188
  • DOI:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.180
  • 出版社:Australian International Academic Centre PTY. LTD.
  • 摘要:Reading strategies are plans for solving problems encountered during reading while learners are deeply engage with the text. So, comprehension is not a simple decoding of symbols, but a complex multidimensional process in which the leaner draws on previous schemata applying strategies consciously. In fact, metacognitive strategies are accessible versatile vehicles if the readers are aware and cognizant of their applications. This paper studied the most frequent used strategies by Iranian ESP students. Fifty six students completed 30-item questionnaire of MARSI (2002). It included three strategy categories: Problem Solving strategies (PROB), Global Reading strategies (GLOB), and Support strategies (SUP). Results indicated that students at the highest level perceived PROB strategies up to 58.93%, SUP strategies up to 32.14%, and GLOB strategies up to 30.37%. Ranking the individual strategies represented that the highest used strategies are strategy 8 (overall mean= 3.51), strategy 20 (overall mean=3.52) and strategy 11 (overall mean=3.77).
  • 其他摘要:Reading strategies are plans for solving problems encountered during reading while learners are deeply engage with the text. So, comprehension is not a simple decoding of symbols, but a complex multidimensional process in which the leaner draws on previous schemata applying strategies consciously. In fact, metacognitive strategies are accessible versatile vehicles if the readers are aware and cognizant of their applications. This paper studied the most frequent used strategies by Iranian ESP students. Fifty six students completed 30-item questionnaire of MARSI (2002). It included three strategy categories: Problem Solving strategies (PROB), Global Reading strategies (GLOB), and Support strategies (SUP). Results indicated that students at the highest level perceived PROB strategies up to 58.93%, SUP strategies up to 32.14%, and GLOB strategies up to 30.37%. Ranking the individual strategies represented that the highest used strategies are strategy 8 (overall mean= 3.51), strategy 20 (overall mean=3.52) and strategy 11 (overall mean=3.77).
  • 关键词:ESP; Metacognitive strategies; Problem Solving strategies; Global Reading strategies; Support strategies
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有