首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月28日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:KEPUTUSAN PENDANAAN : PENDEKATAN TRADE-OFF THEORY DAN PECKING ORDER THEORY
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:MUTAMIMAH MUTAMIMAH ; RITA RITA
  • 期刊名称:Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis
  • 印刷版ISSN:1411-2280
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:10
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:241-249
  • DOI:10.30659/ekobis.10.1.241-249
  • 出版社:Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
  • 摘要:The purpose of this study is to analyze what Trade-off Theory and Pecking Order Theory able to explain the financing decision in Indonesian Capital Market. In this study, determinant of Trade-off theory are non-debt tax shields, size, and liquidity. The determinant of Pecking Order theory are profitability, cash deficit, and investment. Sample in this study are 40 manufacturing companies that active and liquid at Indonesian capital market over two years, from 2005 to 2006. Thus, this study have 80 observations. Sample used the method of purposive sampling. Multiple regression model is used to test this hypothesis. The result of this Trade-off theory approach is found that partially all proxy aren’t statistically significant. But simultaniously non debt tax shields, size, and liquidity variable give statistically significant. While Pecking Order theory approach is found that partially only cash deficit and investment variable statistically significant. But simultaneously profitability, cash deficit, and investment variable have statistically significant. So, firms that go public at Indonesian capital market tend to follow pecking order theory than trade-off theory in their financing decision.
  • 其他摘要:The purpose of this study is to analyze what Trade-off Theory and Pecking Order Theory able to explain the financing decision in Indonesian Capital Market. In this study, determinant of Trade-off theory are non-debt tax shields, size, and liquidity. The determinant of Pecking Order theory are profitability, cash deficit, and investment. Sample in this study are 40 manufacturing companies that active and liquid at Indonesian capital market over two years, from 2005 to 2006. Thus, this study have 80 observations. Sample used the method of purposive sampling. Multiple regression model is used to test this hypothesis. The result of this Trade-off theory approach is found that partially all proxy aren’t statistically significant. But simultaniously non debt tax shields, size, and liquidity variable give statistically significant. While Pecking Order theory approach is found that partially only cash deficit and investment variable statistically significant. But simultaneously profitability, cash deficit, and investment variable have statistically significant. So, firms that go public at Indonesian capital market tend to follow pecking order theory than trade-off theory in their financing decision. Keyword : trade-off theory and pecking order theory
  • 关键词:trade-off theory and pecking order theory
  • 其他关键词:trade-off theory and pecking order theory; fakultas ekonomi unissula; universitas islam sultan agung semarang; unissula; ekonomi
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有