首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月19日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Understanding Scientific Inquiry
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Peter J. Veazie
  • 期刊名称:Science & Philosophy
  • 印刷版ISSN:2282-7757
  • 电子版ISSN:2282-7765
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:6
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:3-14
  • DOI:10.23756/sp.v6i2.437
  • 出版社:Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati
  • 摘要:Science is a process of inquiry: a process of asking and answering questions. However, a good question is more than an interrogatory, and a good answer is more than information: there are logical constraints that dictate when a question is answerable and what qualifies as an answer. This paper will provide an understanding of (1) when a question is answerable, (2) when a question is not ready to be asked, (3) when a question is trivial, (4) what is required for a response to be an answer, and (5) what sequence of inquiry is required to identify an answer. Equipped with this understanding, a scientist can better determine an appropriate sequence of study for a research program as well as identify the necessary arguments to warrant claims of understanding, funding, and the publication of research findings.
  • 关键词:Erotetics; research questions; research philosophy
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有