期刊名称：Ido Movement for Culture: Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology
印刷版ISSN：2084-3763
电子版ISSN：2082-7571
出版年度：2009
卷号：9
期号：1
页码：170-180
语种：English
出版社：Idokan Poland Association in Rzeszów
摘要：The main objective of this study is to determine the effect of two innovative ways of organizing the training of strength (S) and aerobic capacity (A) (concurrent training) to improve the performance and reduce training time in judokas.For that,three groups of judoka beginner,between 19 and 22 years old,participated voluntarily in this study.Every group attended sessions in three days a week for 12 weeks.The S group just trained strength [explosive force (EF) and resistance (R)] in the session (n=7 men and 1 woman,age:19.63±0.74;height:171.87±7.77;weight:66.95±11.51).The S–A (1) group trained aerobic capacity,explosive force and resistance in the same session (n=7 men and 1 woman,age:22.29±1.38;height:178.07±7.26;weight:71.73±13.25).The innovation was that advantage was taken of the rest period between the first and second strength exercises to execute an aerobic capacity circuit.The S A (2) group (n=4 men and 4 women,age:20.88±0.64;height:168.25±8.82;weight:68.00±10.51) carried out the same training as S–A (1) separating the work of A from S in two sessions separated by a 6–hour rest.Before and after the training period,maximum power (MP) was determined in relation to different loads (12,22 and 32kg) in bench press, one repetition maximum (1RM) in bench press,rowing and athletic press,VO2max and specific performance through the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT).The results revealed all the groups significantly increased MP developed in the bench press in every load analyzed (p<0.01).The training used by the three groups produced a significant rise in 1RM in bench press between the pretest and postest (S:22.75%,P=0.001;S–A (2):28.47%,P=0.001 and S–A (1):19.49%,P=0.002 respectively).Group S showed a highly significant increase in 1RM in rowing (27%,P=0.001),which was less significant in group S–A (2) followed by group S–A (1) (11.40%,P=0.04).The training carried out by the three groups studied caused a significant increase in 1RM in athletic press between pretest and postest.(S:42.74%,P=0.001;S–A (2):47.81%, P=0.001 and S–A (1):32.61%,P=0.002 respectively).VO2max was significantly increased (p<0.01) in the groups who worked concurrently over those who only trained strength [7.93% in S;17.06% in S–A (2) and 19.71% in S–A (1)].The SJFT did not show significant changes in the effect of the training period (p>0.05).
其他摘要：Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de İBBS Düzey–2’ye göre alt bölgelerinin rekabet gücü endekslerini belirlemek ve söz konusu endekslerin kişi başına düşen Gayri Safi Yurt İçi Hasıla (GSYH) yaratmadaki etkinliklerini tespit etmektir.Çalışmada hem yüksek eksenli rekabeti oluşturan hem de kişi başına düşen GSYH’yi etkileyen dört temel unsur –iktisadi yapı,yenilikçilik,beşeri sermaye ile altyapı ve ulaşılabilirlik– dikkate alınmaktadır.Çalışmada Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) yöntemleri takip edilmektedir.Girdi değişkeni yukarıda belirtilen dört faktöre ait 17 değişkenden oluşmaktadır.Çıktı değişkeni ise kişi başına düşen GSYH’dir.Çalışmada öncelikle AFA ile bölgesel rekabet endeksleri elde edilmektedir.Daha sonra VZA ile bu endekslerin girdi olarak kişi başına düşen GSYH yaratmadaki etkinlikleri tahmin edilmektedir.İktisadi ve yenilikçi altyapı,kalifiye işgücü altyapısı ve bölgesel temel altyapı endeks sonuçlarına göre TR10 İstanbul,TR31 İzmir,TR42 Kocaeli ve TR51 Ankara,Türkiye’nin en rekabetçi alt bölgeleridir.CCR modelinde kişi başına GSYH yaratmada sadece üç alt bölge –TR10 İstanbul,TR42 Kocaeli ve TR51 Ankara– etkin olurken BCC modelinde etkin olan bölgeler TR10 İstanbul,TR21 Tekirdağ,TR42 Kocaeli,TR51 Ankara,TR82 Kastamonu,TRA2 Ağrı,TRB2 Van ve TRC2 Şanlıurfa’dır.
