摘要：The article provides an overview of typological mechanisms in the arrangement of communicative practices in modern political discourse and methods of verbal explication of its axiological and symbolic constituents,determining mental universals in individual/collective consciousness. The study provides a systematic characterization of linguistic and social-and-cultural dominants in political interaction. Verbal indicators of social asymmetry are identified. The description of the language of political discourse aspectual data are summarized. A multilevel analysis of the component structure of political interactions is carried out. The genre specifics of legitimate and illegitimate communicative acts is taken into consideration. The combination of the methods applied in discourse analysis,such as linguistic cognitive projection,linguistic-and-cultural interpretation and functional-and-pragmatic examination of text units,enabled the researchers to identify and qualify linguo-semiotic elements of political practices. Hence,an ecolinguistic typology of basic linguistic components of political communication acts characterized by various legitimacy degrees has been carried out. The study revealed a possibility to single out a specific communicative range in Russian political discourse,in the framework of which linguistic and cultural resources of ideologically charged discursive practices would be actualized and the area of possible communication risks would be significantly expanded.
其他摘要：В статье рассматриваются типологические механизмы организации коммуникативных практик современного политического дискурса и способы языковой экспликации его аксиологических и символических конституентов,детерминирующих ментальные универсалии индивидуально
关键词：political discourse;ecolinguistics;legitimate political practices;illegitimate political practices;linguistic-and-cultural dominants;verbal indicators;communicative risks.
其他关键词：политический дискурс;эколингвистика;легитимные политические практики;нелегитимные политические практики;лингвокультурные доминанты;речевые маркеры;коммуникативные риски
