摘要：Penelitian ini pertama mengkajipertimbangan Mahkamah Agung(MA) dalam memutuskan pembatalan putusan Arbitrase baik menurut alasan pembatalan berdasarkan Pasal 70 dan diluar Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Tentang Arbitrase, kedua mengkaji dan menganalisis teori yang digunakan MA dalam pertimbangan untuk membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase. Ketiga merumuskan suatu konsep dalam memutuskan pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase yang berbasis kepada asas keadilan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif.Beberapa pendekatan yang digunakan dalam melakukan analisis dalam penelitian ini ialah pendekatan kasus.Secara lebih rinci data yang diperoleh dari penelitian, diolah dan dianalisis disajikan secara deskriptif kualitatif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertama berdasarkan pertimbangan Putusan MARI No. 729/K/Pdt.Sus/2008 melihat Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase bersifat limitatif, Berbeda dengan Putusan MARI No.03/Arb.BTU 2005 yang menafsirkan Pasal 70 bersifat enunciatif.Kedua Hakim Agung yang membatalkan putusan arbitrase berdasarkan Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase yang bersifat limitatif menggunakan teori Analitis.Hakim Agung yang membatalkan putusan arbitrase mengacu pada alasan diluar Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase menggunakan teori hukum Progresif.Ketiga Berdasarkan keadilan Prosedural alasan pembatalan berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 70 UU Arbitrase terlalu limitatif jika dibandingkan dengan Pasal 34 The UNICITRAL Model Law. Keadilan substantif ini harus dibatasi dengan rambu-rambu, agar arbi?ter menggunakannya tidak semena-mena.
其他摘要：This research has 3 aims, the first is to examines the consideration of the Supreme Court in deciding the cancellation of arbitration decision under Article 70 and beyond Article 70 of Arbitration Act, the second is to review and analyze theories used in the consideration of the Su?preme Court to cancel the Arbitration Decision.The third is to formu?late concept in deciding the cancellation of Arbitration based on the principle of justice. This type of research is normative judicial research.Approach used in this research is case study approach. In more detail of the data obtained, processed and analyzed and presented in descriptive qualitative. The result of the research is divided into several parts, the first shows that according to the consideration of Deision of Supreme Court No.729/K/Pdt.Sus/2008 see Article 70 of the Arbitrase Act is limitative, different with Supreme Court Decision No.03/Arb/ BTU of 2005 interpeting Article is enunciatif.The second, the Great Judge who cancel the arbitrase decision according to Article 70 Arbitra?tion Act which is limitative by using Analytical theory.the Great Judge cancel the arbitrase decision refers to reasons beyond Article 70 of Rbitrase Act using Progressive Law theory. The third, according to pro?cedural fairness the reason for cancellation is based on decision Article No.70 Arbitrase Act is too limitative comparing to Article 34 of the UNICITRAL Model Law.This substantive justice should be limited to the signs, so that arbitrators use it arbitrarily.
关键词：Inkonsistensi;Putusan Mahkamah Agung;Pembatalan;Putusan Arbitrase
