期刊名称：Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
电子版ISSN：1975-5937
出版年度：2019
卷号：16
期号：1
页码：1-12
DOI：10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.22
语种：English
出版社：Korea Health Insurance Licensing Examination Institute
摘要：Purpose:In contemporary pharmacy,the role of pharmacists has become more multifaceted,as they now handle a wider range of tasks and take more responsibility for providing patient care than 20 years ago.This evolution in pharmacists’ responsibilities has been accom_x0002_panied by the need for pharmacists to display high-quality patient-centred care and counselling,and to demonstrate professionalism,which now needs to be taught and assessed as part of pharmacy education and practice.This study aimed at identifying definitions of professionalism in pharmacy practice and critically evaluating published instruments for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice.Methods:We searched the medical literature listed in Scopus,MEDLINE,and PsycINFO databases from 1 January 2000 to 31 De?cember 2018.All papers meeting our selection criteria were reviewed and summarised into a clear review of professionalism require?ments in pharmacy practice.Details of the instruments measuring professionalism were reviewed in detail.Results:There is no accepted simple definition of professionalism,although we identified several theoretical and policy frameworks re?quired for professional pharmaceutical practice.We identified 4 instruments (the Behavioural Professionalism Assessment Instrument,Lerkiatbundit’s instrument,the Pharmacy Professionalism Instrument,and the Professionalism Assessment Tool that build on these frameworks and measure professional practice in pharmacy students.These were found to be reliable and valid,but had only been used and tested in student populations.Conclusion:Given the increasingly broad role of community pharmacists,there is a need for assessments of professionalism in prac?tice.Professionalism is a complex concept that is challenging to measure because it has no standardised definition and the existing liter?ature related to the topic is limited.Currently available instruments focus on measuring the development of the elements of profession?alism among pharmacy students,rather than pharmacists.
关键词：Purpose:In contemporary pharmacy,the role of pharmacists has become more multifaceted,as they now handle a wider range of tasks and take more responsibility for providing patient care than 20 years ago.This evolution in pharmacists’ responsibilities has been accom_x0002_panied by the need for pharmacists to display high-quality patient-centred care and counselling,and to demonstrate professionalism,which now needs to be taught and assessed as part of pharmacy education and practice.This study aimed at identifying definitions of professionalism in pharmacy practice and critically evaluating published instruments for assessing professionalism in pharmacy practice.Methods:We searched the medical literature listed in Scopus,MEDLINE,and PsycINFO databases from 1 January 2000 to 31 De?cember 2018.All papers meeting our selection criteria were reviewed and summarised into a clear review of professionalism require?ments in pharmacy practice.Details of the instruments measuring professionalism were reviewed in detail.Results:There is no accepted simple definition of professionalism,although we identified several theoretical and policy frameworks re?quired for professional pharmaceutical practice.We identified 4 instruments (the Behavioural Professionalism Assessment Instrument,Lerkiatbundit’s instrument,the Pharmacy Professionalism Instrument,and the Professionalism Assessment Tool that build on these frameworks and measure professional practice in pharmacy students.These were found to be reliable and valid,but had only been used and tested in student populations.Conclusion:Given the increasingly broad role of community pharmacists,there is a need for assessments of professionalism in prac?tice.Professionalism is a complex concept that is challenging to measure because it has no standardised definition and the existing liter?ature related to the topic is limited.Currently available instruments focus on measuring the development of the elements of profession?alism among pharmacy students,rather than pharmacists.
