首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月20日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Propolis içeren çinko oksit öjenol esaslı deneysel kök kanal patlarının fiziksel özelliklerinin standart patlarla in vitro olarak karşılaştırılması
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Mügem Aslı EKİCİ ; Hüma ÖMÜRLÜ
  • 期刊名称:Acta Odontologica Turcica
  • 印刷版ISSN:2147-690X
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:36
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:59-66
  • DOI:10.17214/gaziaot.440060
  • 出版社:Gazi Universitesi * Faculty of Dentistry
  • 摘要:Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı propolis içeren çinko oksit öjenol esaslı deneysel patların (PP) fiziksel özelliklerinin ve mikrosızıntısının Grossman patı ve AH Plus ile karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, Tekirdağ yöresinden (Trakya bölgesi, Türkiye) toplanılan propolis kullanıldı. Değişik oranlarda propolis içeren patlar [%5 (PP5), %10 (PP10), %25 (PP25), %50 (PP50)], Grossman patı ve AH Plus ile karşılaştırıldı. Film kalınlıkları, akıcılıkları, radyoopasiteleri, sertleşme süreleri, çözünürlükleri ve sudaki ekstraktlarının pH’ları ISO 6876/2001 standartlarına göre değerlendirildi. Patların mikrosızıntıları bilgisayarlı sıvı filtrasyon yöntemiyle incelendi. İstatistiksel analizde pH için Friedman testi, diğer tüm testlerin analizinde Kruskal-Wallis testi kullanıldı ( α =0.05). Bulgular: PP’lerin çözünürlük hariç diğer fiziksel özellikleri ISO 6876/2001 standartlarına uygundu. PP’lerin çözünürlüğü Grossman patına benzer (p>0.05), AH Plus’tan anlamlı şekilde fazlaydı (p0.05; ikisi birbirine benzerdi), en düşük değerler ise AH Plus’ta görüldü; PP10, PP25 ve PP50 bunların arasında idi. Sonuç: Propolis patlarının fiziksel özelliklerinin çoğunun ISO 6876/2001 standartlarına uygun bulunması, mikrosızıntılarının Grossman patından daha az olması ve sudaki ekstraktlarının pH’lerinin uygun olması gelecekte olası klinik kullanımları için umut vericidir. Objective: To compare the physical properties and microleakage of zinc oxide eugenol-based experimental sealers containing propolis (PS) with Grossman sealer and AH Plus. Materials and Method: Propolis collected from Tekirdağ area ( Thrace region, Turkey ) was used. Experimental sealers containing propolis at different ratios were prepared [5% (PS5), 10% (PS10), 25% (PS25), 50% (PS50)], and compared with Grossman sealer and AH Plus. The film thickness, flow, radioopacity, setting time, solubility and pH of the aqueous extracts were evaluated according to the ISO 6876/2001 standards. The microleakage was evaluated using the computerized fluid filtration method. Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for the statistical analysis of the pH and the remaining data, respectively ( α =0.05). Results: Except for the solubility, the physical properties of the PSs were compatible with the ISO 6876/2001 standards. The solubility of the PSs was similar to the Grossman sealer (p>0.05); but significantly greater than the AH Plus (p0.05; the two were similar), and the lowest values were seen in AH Plus; PS10, PS25 and PS50 had intermediate microleakage. Conclusion: The PSs are promising for possible future clinical use as most of their physical properties were in accordance with the ISO 6876/2001 standards. Besides, their microleakage values were less than the Grossman sealer, and their aqueous extracts revealed favorable pH.
  • 其他摘要:Objective: To compare the physical properties and microleakage of zinc oxide eugenol-based experimental sealers containing propolis (PS) with Grossman sealer and AH Plus. Materials and Method: Propolis collected from Tekirdağ area ( Thrace region, Turkey ) was used. Experimental sealers containing propolis at different ratios were prepared [5% (PS5), 10% (PS10), 25% (PS25), 50% (PS50)], and compared with Grossman sealer and AH Plus. The film thickness, flow, radioopacity, setting time, solubility and pH of the aqueous extracts were evaluated according to the ISO 6876/2001 standards. The microleakage was evaluated using the computerized fluid filtration method. Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for the statistical analysis of the pH and the remaining data, respectively ( α =0.05). Results: Except for the solubility, the physical properties of the PSs were compatible with the ISO 6876/2001 standards. The solubility of the PSs was similar to the Grossman sealer (p>0.05); but significantly greater than the AH Plus (p<0.05). Regarding the inter-group comparison of the pH, the aqueous extracts of all PSs had either similar or significantly greater pH compared with those of the Grossman sealer or AH Plus (p<0.05). Significant differences were also found in the intra-group analyses (p<0.05) with a general tendency of an increase in the pH values with time. As for the microleakage, the highest values were seen in PS5 and the Grossman sealer (p>0.05; the two were similar), and the lowest values were seen in AH Plus; PS10, PS25 and PS50 had intermediate microleakage. Conclusion: The PSs are promising for possible future clinical use as most of their physical properties were in accordance with the ISO 6876/2001 standards. Besides, their microleakage values were less than the Grossman sealer, and their aqueous extracts revealed favorable pH.
  • 关键词:Kök kanal dolgu materyalleri ; kök kanal tedavisi ; propolis
  • 其他关键词:Root canal filling materials ; propolis ; root canal therapy
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有