摘要：This research aims to analyze existing norms conflict between Article 16 Paragraph (1) c of Act No. 2 of 2014 on the Amendment Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary which provides that the Notary required to attach the fingerprint of the parties facing the Minuta Deed,and Article 77 of Act No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company which provides that the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (AGMS) through media teleconference,videoconference,or other means of electronic media. It also examines the juridical implications of the Notary and Acts of the AGMS through electronic media if the Notary does not fulfill the obligation to attach the fingerprint of the parties facing the Minuta Deed. To answer the above norm conflict,the type of research conducted by researchers is a normative juridical research using the statute approach and conceptual approach. The results of this research,that there is a conflict of norms in the form of obscurity norm,disharmony and emptiness norm in the relevant legislation. Regarding the juridical implications of the notary when not fulfilling the obligation to attach the fingerprint of the parties facing the Minuta Deed,then the notary may be subject to sanctions pursuant to Article 16,paragraph (11) of Act No. 2 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 30 of 2004 on the Notary. As against the deed of the AGMS,fingerprint embedding function within minutes of notarial deed is not a legal action to determine the validity or authenticity of the certificate,but only serves to ensure the correctness identity of the facing parties.
其他摘要：Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisa konflik norma yang ada antara Pasal 16 Ayat (1) huruf c Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-undang Nomor 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris yang mengatur bahwa Notaris wajib untuk melekatkan si
关键词：general meeting of shareholders;electronic media;fingerprints;minuta deed
其他关键词：rapat umum pemegang saham (RUPS);media elektronik;sidik jari;minuta akta
