首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Analyzing the recency effects on long series audit information and its mitigation methods with group discussions
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Yolanda Christina Rambing ; Yolanda Christina Rambing ; Intiyas Utami
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy
  • 印刷版ISSN:2087-3735
  • 电子版ISSN:2088-785X
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:22
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:202-212
  • DOI:10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1204
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (PPPM STIE)
  • 摘要:This study aims to examine the recency effect that occurs due to the effect of sequences on long series audit information and test the effectiveness of group discussion to improve the decision quality. The recency effect is a tendency to give more weight to the latest information compared to other information received. Therefore, it is necessary to provide a method for mitigating the recency effect by using group discussion. This study used a 2x2x2 experimental design for a subject with 81 participants from accounting students. The results show that the individual decision quality that experienced the recency effect due to positive-negative and negative-positive sequential information after group discussion became better than before group discussion. The individual decision quality that experienced the recency effect due to positive-negative simultaneous information could not be mitigated by group discussion. Group discussion is an effective method for overcoming the recency effect on sequential information rather than on simultaneous information. Therefore, group discussion can be used as a strategy to reduce recency effects and improve the quality of audience decisions.
  • 其他摘要:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efek resensi yang terjadi karena pengaruh urutan pada informasi audit seri panjang dan menguji efektivitas penggunaan diskusi kelompok untuk meningkatkan kualitas keputusan. Efek resensi adalah untuk memberi bobot
  • 关键词:Order effect; Primacy effect; Recency effect; Group discussion
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有