期刊名称：Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology and Practical Philosophy
印刷版ISSN：2067-3655
出版年度：2016
卷号：8
期号：2
页码：371-395
语种：English
出版社：Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi
摘要：Basing on the Michel Foucault’s description of the philosophical modernity given by him in his famous book Words and Things (1966), I found that there is the compliance between the beginning of the Modern philosophy and the Kant’s discovery of the a priori synthesis. It is also well known that Husserl uses the term “synthesis” in his phenomenology. Thus, the Husserl’s phenomenology could belong to the same branch of philosophy as the Kant’s philosophy. To verify this hypothesis, I analyze the views on synthesis a priori of both thinkers, Kant and Husserl, and then I compare them. One ought to say that Husserl widens the Kant’s view of the synthesis a priori through his notion of material a priori as well as through his differentiation of active and passive kinds of synthesis. As conclusion, I pose the question of the possibility of a priori synthesis after Kant and Husserl, taking into account the Moritz Schlick’s criticism of the synthetic propositions a priori.
其他摘要：In seinem Buch „Die Ordnung der Dinge“ versucht Michel Foucault das Zeitalter der Moderne zu beschreiben. Dabei weißt er darauf hin, dass die Philosophie Kants den Anfang der Modernität im philosophischen Denken markiert. Der historische Grund, Kant a
关键词：synthesis a priori; representations; active and passive syntheses; formal and material a priori; Kant; Husserl
