出版社：Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences
摘要：In the article some operational terms in historical text (here in the genre of the popular-scientific synthesis of a national history) are taken into consid eration, notably: final (term by Boris Uspienski) and narration/narrative. It is demonstrated how the last link of a chain of events in historical representa_x005f?tion – called by Uspienski the final – influences, and in fact enables, the very construction of any story about the past. Moreover, the final makes it possible to grasp all historical entities (protagonists, events, etc.) within a defined axi?ological sphere. Thus, some entities are considered to be good whereas some other are bad. Their role in a narrative is determined in relation to the final that affirms a teleology of a nation (here in the example of Polish nation). In this context, the two concepts that of event and process, taken from narratol?ogy (Doležel and van Dijk), are elaborated.
