首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月18日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Analysis of Economic Development GAP Between Regencies in Central Java Provinces
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Panji Irawan Yogyadipratama ; Panji Irawan Yogyadipratama ; P. Eko Prasetyo
  • 期刊名称:Economics Development Analysis Journal
  • 印刷版ISSN:2252-6560
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:194-199
  • DOI:10.15294/edaj.v5i2.22032
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • 摘要:The purpose of this study were (1) to know how the development level of inequality of economic development in Central Java Province according to Williamson Index; (2) determine the extent of the influence of the labor force to the level of economic development of Central Java Province; and (3) know how to influence the allocation of development aid districts / cities to the economic development of Central Java province. This research is a quantitative research used panel data, time series data (years 2002-2011) and cross section (35 districts / cities in Central Java province). The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS). The analytical method used is the method of multiple linear regression analysis of panel data with FEM methods used tools Eviews 7 software. Results of the study is to show (1) the economic development gaps between regions in Central Java province which is calculated using Williamson index during the period 2008- 2011 showed a widening inequality; (2) the allocation of development aid from the central government uneven and areas that receive aid are too large can increase the level of inequality between regions. This is due to the construction of concentrated to areas that are already developed than areas that are still lagging behind, because the area is developed better facilities from areas not yet developed; and (3) R2 value of 0.9949 means variable variation inequality of economic development in Central Java province can be explained by variables of the labor force and the allocation of regional development funds amounting to 95.5% while the remaining 0.05% is explained by other factors outside the model.
  • 关键词:inequality of development; labor; and the allocation of development aid
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有