出版社：University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
摘要：The composition of a criminal court stands as one of the most interesting issues in the comparative law.Different viewpoints when it comes to the need of including non-professional citizens in the contemporary criminal procedure have contributed to interesting approaches related to regulating this issue.First of all,there are original jury systems that are a feature related mainly to the Anglo-American legal systems,but whose ideas have found their place in the European legislature as well.Furthermore,there arc countries where the trial body stands as a separate authority,which consists of professional judges and lay judges,whereas some of the countries have both professional judges and lay judges,the first being in charge of resolving legal issues,and the second ones being in charge of factual issues.There are many articles devoted to the jury systems in the world,but in a very small proportion of them we could find solutions from the mixed court of the Balkan countries.Mixed court is one of the features continental countries.The authors compare Balkan countries,where Slovenia and Croatia being the European Union Members,whereas the rest of them are in the process of accession.Thereby,some of the countries strive to get their courts become more professionalby leaving out citizens non-professional from the composition of trial chamber,while some of them have kept them,whereby the scope of their jurisdiction varies from one country to another.Today,it is a great question whether a mixed court will survive legislative changes,due to the criticism of the jurists and non-jurists.
其他摘要：Состав cydehux eeha jedHO je од на]интересантни]ах читана данаш-лице,поготово у времену великих реформских подухвата.Различита схватала потребе за учешНем гра^ана-лаика у савременам кривичном поступку допри-неіа су заним/ьивим npucmynu.ua у регулисалу тог питала.На прваи месту,nocmoje прави поротни системы,щи су облика превосходно англоамеричког правног система,али су легове udeje наиіле место и у европским законо-давствима.nocmoje и државе у щима cydehe eehe предста&ьа jedno meio,составлено од cyduja професионалаца и cyduja поротника,док у nojeduHUM имамо,maKofje,и судще професионалце и поротнике,али су прей задужени за решавале правних,а други за решавале чиленичних питала.Аутори у раду пореде структуру судских eeha у кривичним поступцима за пунолетна лица у nojeduHUM балканским зем/ьама,од щ'их су,примера ради.Словенца и Хрват-ска чланице Европске ynuje,док су друге у процесу придруживала.Неке од лих теже професионализацщи судства,избацуіуНи гра^ане-лаике из состава суд-ског eeha,док су их друге задржале,при чему обим лихове надлежности ваpupa од државе до државе.
